- ICH GCP
- Registr klinických studií v USA
- Klinická studie NCT04666337
Fentanyl Versus Tramadol as Co-administrator to Bupivacaine
Fentanyl Versus Tramadol as Co-administrator to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade: Pons and Cons
Přehled studie
Postavení
Podmínky
Intervence / Léčba
Detailní popis
There are multiple controversies among the previous studies for the use of different opioids as adjuvants for brachial plexus blockade to improve various block characteristics. Moreover, limited studies estimate the pons and cons of tramadol versus fentanyl as co-administrator to bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade.
In our study, we aim to assess the utility of fentanyl versus tramadol as co-administrator to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade in upper limb surgeries in a prospective randomized controlled fashion. The primary outcome is to compare between the efficacy of tramadol versus fentanyl as adjuvants on the onset and duration of sensory and motor block and the secondary outcome is to compare between the efficacy of tramadol versus fentanyl as adjuvants on postoperative analgesia, time of the request to rescue analgesia, postoperative analgesic consumption, and complications.
The patients were aged between 18 and 60, both gender, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II. However, patients who had bleeding disorders got opioid analgesics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors before surgery, had a history of seizures, respiratory or cardiac diseases, local infections at the site where needle for the block is to be inserted, pregnant woman and in whom the block effect was partial and required supplementary anesthesia were excluded from the study.
Patients were randomly allocated into three groups for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Randomization was established using the computer-generated closed envelopes method.
Group B (bupivacaine group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml normal saline Group F (fentanyl group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl (1µg/kg-2 ml) Group T (tramadol group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus tramadol (1mg/kg-2 ml)
Typ studie
Zápis (Aktuální)
Fáze
- Nelze použít
Kontakty a umístění
Studijní místa
-
-
-
Aswan, Egypt, 81511
- Aswan university hospital
-
-
Kritéria účasti
Kritéria způsobilosti
Věk způsobilý ke studiu
Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky
Pohlaví způsobilá ke studiu
Popis
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II. scheduled for forearm or hand surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- bleeding disorders
- patients who got opioid analgesics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors before surgery,
- history of seizures, respiratory or cardiac diseases
- local infections at the site where the needle for the block is to be inserted
- a pregnant woman
- the block effect was partial and required supplementary anesthesia
Studijní plán
Jak je studie koncipována?
Detaily designu
- Primární účel: Léčba
- Přidělení: Randomizované
- Intervenční model: Paralelní přiřazení
- Maskování: Trojnásobný
Zbraně a zásahy
Skupina účastníků / Arm |
Intervence / Léčba |
---|---|
Aktivní komparátor: Group B (bupivacaine group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus normal saline (2ml)
|
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe.
The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side.
In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view.
After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe.
Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
|
Aktivní komparátor: Group F (fentanyl group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl (100µg-2 ml)
|
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe.
The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side.
In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view.
After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe.
Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
|
Aktivní komparátor: Group T (tramadol group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus tramadol (100mg-2 ml)
|
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe.
The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side.
In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view.
After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe.
Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
|
Co je měření studie?
Primární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
---|---|---|
Délka senzorického bloku v hodinách
Časové okno: 24 hodin
|
Je to doba od začátku senzorického bloku do doby obnovení citlivosti v místě chirurgického zákroku
|
24 hodin
|
Doba trvání bloku motoru v hodinách
Časové okno: 24 hodin
|
Je to doba od začátku motorického bloku k obnovení globální mobility v ruce a zápěstí.
|
24 hodin
|
Onset time of sensory block in minutes
Časové okno: 40 minutes
|
After the injection of the solution, every patient was checked for the onset of sensory blockade using goose soaked with iced normal saline by the following scale (three-point scale): Grade 0= perceived as normal sensation, Grade 1 = loss of cold sensation (analgesia), Grade 2= loss of sensation of touch (anesthesia).
|
40 minutes
|
onset time of motor blockade in minutes using the modified Bromage scale (Three-point scale)
Časové okno: 40 minutes
|
the modified Bromage scale (Three-point scale): Grade 0: Normal motor function, Grade 1: Decreased motor strength with the ability to move the fingers only, Grade 2: Complete motor block with an inability to move the fingers.
|
40 minutes
|
Sekundární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
---|---|---|
Doba požadavku na první pooperační analgetikum v hodinách
Časové okno: 24 hodin
|
byl odebrán od doby úplného senzorického bloku do požadavku na záchrannou analgezii při VAS > 4 cm.
|
24 hodin
|
Průměrný krevní tlak v mmHg
Časové okno: 24 hodin
|
byla měřena před blokem (0 min) a v 5, 10, 15, 30 min a poté 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 a 24 h po bloku
|
24 hodin
|
srdeční frekvence v tepech / minuta
Časové okno: 24 hodin
|
byla měřena před blokem (0 min) a v 5, 10, 15, 30 min a poté 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 a 24 h po bloku.
|
24 hodin
|
periferní saturace kyslíkem
Časové okno: 24 hodin
|
byla měřena před blokem (0 min) a v 5, 10, 15, 30 min a poté 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 a 24 h po bloku.
|
24 hodin
|
Visual analog scale (VAS): the VAS consisted of a straight, vertical 10-cm line; the bottom point represented "no pain" = (0 cm) and the top "the worst pain you ever have" = (10 cm).
Časové okno: 24 hours
|
Patients were asked to rate their pain intensity at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after the block
|
24 hours
|
Rescue analgesia in the form of 0.05 mg/kg morphine sulfate intravenously
Časové okno: 24 hours
|
was given when VAS ≥ 4 cm
|
24 hours
|
Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé
Sponzor
Vyšetřovatelé
- Vrchní vyšetřovatel: huda fahmy, ph D, Aswan University
Termíny studijních záznamů
Hlavní termíny studia
Začátek studia (Aktuální)
Primární dokončení (Aktuální)
Dokončení studie (Aktuální)
Termíny zápisu do studia
První předloženo
První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality
První zveřejněno (Aktuální)
Aktualizace studijních záznamů
Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)
Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality
Naposledy ověřeno
Více informací
Termíny související s touto studií
Klíčová slova
Další relevantní podmínky MeSH
Další identifikační čísla studie
- 337/2/19
Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty
Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA
Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA
produkt vyrobený a vyvážený z USA
Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .