Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Fentanyl Versus Tramadol as Co-administrator to Bupivacaine

12 december 2020 uppdaterad av: huda fahmy, Aswan University Hospital

Fentanyl Versus Tramadol as Co-administrator to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade: Pons and Cons

Supraclavicular brachial plexus approach is an alternative technique to general anesthesia resulting in a fast onset of a reliable blockage of the brachial plexus. The use of ultrasound for the performance of supraclavicular block has become the gold standard since it enables the clinician to deposit the local anesthetic close to the nerves in real-time that improves the success rate with a safety margin. Adjuvants are added to local anesthetic in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade to improve the quality of nerve blocks and the duration of analgesia. It should be noted that no adjuvant has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prolongation of peripheral nerve blocks

Studieöversikt

Detaljerad beskrivning

There are multiple controversies among the previous studies for the use of different opioids as adjuvants for brachial plexus blockade to improve various block characteristics. Moreover, limited studies estimate the pons and cons of tramadol versus fentanyl as co-administrator to bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade.

In our study, we aim to assess the utility of fentanyl versus tramadol as co-administrator to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade in upper limb surgeries in a prospective randomized controlled fashion. The primary outcome is to compare between the efficacy of tramadol versus fentanyl as adjuvants on the onset and duration of sensory and motor block and the secondary outcome is to compare between the efficacy of tramadol versus fentanyl as adjuvants on postoperative analgesia, time of the request to rescue analgesia, postoperative analgesic consumption, and complications.

The patients were aged between 18 and 60, both gender, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II. However, patients who had bleeding disorders got opioid analgesics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors before surgery, had a history of seizures, respiratory or cardiac diseases, local infections at the site where needle for the block is to be inserted, pregnant woman and in whom the block effect was partial and required supplementary anesthesia were excluded from the study.

Patients were randomly allocated into three groups for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Randomization was established using the computer-generated closed envelopes method.

Group B (bupivacaine group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml normal saline Group F (fentanyl group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl (1µg/kg-2 ml) Group T (tramadol group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus tramadol (1mg/kg-2 ml)

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

66

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

      • Aswan, Egypten, 81511
        • Aswan university hospital

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

18 år till 60 år (Vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II. scheduled for forearm or hand surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bleeding disorders
  • patients who got opioid analgesics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors before surgery,
  • history of seizures, respiratory or cardiac diseases
  • local infections at the site where the needle for the block is to be inserted
  • a pregnant woman
  • the block effect was partial and required supplementary anesthesia

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Behandling
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Trippel

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Group B (bupivacaine group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus normal saline (2ml)
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe. The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side. In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view. After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe. Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
Aktiv komparator: Group F (fentanyl group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl (100µg-2 ml)
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe. The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side. In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view. After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe. Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
Aktiv komparator: Group T (tramadol group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus tramadol (100mg-2 ml)
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe. The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side. In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view. After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe. Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Varaktighet av sensorisk blockering i timmar
Tidsram: 24 timmar
Det är tiden från sensorisk blockering till tidpunkten för återställande av känseln på operationsstället
24 timmar
Motorblockets varaktighet i timmar
Tidsram: 24 timmar
Det är tiden från motorblockering till återställandet av global rörlighet i handen och handleden.
24 timmar
Onset time of sensory block in minutes
Tidsram: 40 minutes
After the injection of the solution, every patient was checked for the onset of sensory blockade using goose soaked with iced normal saline by the following scale (three-point scale): Grade 0= perceived as normal sensation, Grade 1 = loss of cold sensation (analgesia), Grade 2= loss of sensation of touch (anesthesia).
40 minutes
onset time of motor blockade in minutes using the modified Bromage scale (Three-point scale)
Tidsram: 40 minutes
the modified Bromage scale (Three-point scale): Grade 0: Normal motor function, Grade 1: Decreased motor strength with the ability to move the fingers only, Grade 2: Complete motor block with an inability to move the fingers.
40 minutes

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Postoperativ första analgetikabegäran i timmar
Tidsram: 24 timmar
togs från tidpunkten för fullständig sensorisk blockering till begäran att rädda analgesi när VAS > 4 cm.
24 timmar
Genomsnittligt blodtryck i mmHg
Tidsram: 24 timmar
mättes före blocket (0 min) och vid 5, 10, 15, 30 minuter sedan 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 och 24 timmar efter blocket
24 timmar
hjärtfrekvens i slag/minut
Tidsram: 24 timmar
mättes före blocket (0 min) och 5, 10, 15, 30 min sedan 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 och 24 timmar efter blocket.
24 timmar
perifer syremättnad
Tidsram: 24 timmar
mättes före blocket (0 min) och 5, 10, 15, 30 min sedan 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 och 24 timmar efter blocket.
24 timmar
Visual analog scale (VAS): the VAS consisted of a straight, vertical 10-cm line; the bottom point represented "no pain" = (0 cm) and the top "the worst pain you ever have" = (10 cm).
Tidsram: 24 hours
Patients were asked to rate their pain intensity at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after the block
24 hours
Rescue analgesia in the form of 0.05 mg/kg morphine sulfate intravenously
Tidsram: 24 hours
was given when VAS ≥ 4 cm
24 hours

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Utredare

  • Huvudutredare: huda fahmy, ph D, Aswan University

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

15 februari 2019

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

31 augusti 2020

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

30 september 2020

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

1 december 2020

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

7 december 2020

Första postat (Faktisk)

14 december 2020

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

16 december 2020

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

12 december 2020

Senast verifierad

1 december 2020

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • 337/2/19

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Nej

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Nej

produkt tillverkad i och exporterad från U.S.A.

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera