Gamification Versus E-Learning for Electrocardiogram Education
Comparing the Effectiveness of Gamification Educational Method and E-learning Educational Method
研究概览
详细说明
Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is an essential competency for nursing students and novice nurses. Traditional educational approaches, including lecture-based and self-directed e-learning methods, may not fully engage learners or promote active participation. Gamification has emerged as an innovative educational strategy that incorporates game elements into learning activities to enhance motivation, engagement, and knowledge acquisition.
This randomized controlled study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of a gamification educational method with a conventional e-learning educational method for ECG education. Participants were assigned to either a gamification group or an e-learning group. The gamification intervention incorporated interactive learning activities designed to facilitate active participation and reinforce ECG learning concepts, whereas the comparison group received self-directed e-learning instruction.
The study was designed to evaluate whether gamification could improve learning outcomes and provide evidence for the application of innovative educational strategies in nursing education and clinical training programs.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Taiwan
-
Tainan、Taiwan、台湾、709
- Tainan Municipal An-Nan Hospital, China Medical University
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Nursing students who completed medical-surgical nursing coursework
- Newly graduated nurses undergoing clinical orientation
- Able to understand study procedures
- Willing to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous participation in the study
- Failure to complete study questionnaires
- Declined participation
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:其他
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:Gamified ECG Education
Participants received electrocardiogram education through a gamification educational method that incorporated game-based learning activities designed to enhance learner engagement and participation.
|
Participants received electrocardiogram education through a self-directed e-learning educational method using online educational materials and instructional content.
|
|
有源比较器:E-learning ECG Education
Participants received electrocardiogram education through a self-directed e-learning educational method using online instructional materials.
|
Participants received electrocardiogram education through a self-directed e-learning educational method using online educational materials and instructional content.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Electrocardiogram Knowledge Questionnaire Score
大体时间:Immediately before and immediately after the intervention
|
Measured using a 20-item electrocardiogram knowledge questionnaire.
Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater ECG knowledge.
|
Immediately before and immediately after the intervention
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Learning Confidence Scale Score
大体时间:Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention
|
The Learning Confidence Score Scale consists of 5 questions, designed to measure a participant's confidence in interpreting ECGs and applying them clinically after completing an ECG course.
A 0-100mm line is divided into 100 divisions, marked with a scale from 1 to 100, where 0 represents no confidence and 100 represents full confidence.
The test subject quantifies their self-perceived visual score from 0 to 100.
|
Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention
|
|
Learning Satisfaction Questionnaire Score
大体时间:Immediately after completion of the educational intervention
|
This questionnaire includes key evaluation points for teaching effectiveness, such as lesson planning, teaching material presentation, teaching strategies, teaching assessment, and teaching atmosphere.
It comprises 13 questions and uses a Likert scale, with 1 point for "very dissatisfied" and 5 points for "very satisfied."
The total score ranges from 13 to 65 points, with higher scores indicating higher course satisfaction.
|
Immediately after completion of the educational intervention
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
IPD 计划说明
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.