Improving Hypertension Control in the Inner City

February 10, 2016 updated by: Medical College of Wisconsin
To conduct a community based education program using existing resources to improve hypertension control in the inner city through multiple interventions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND:

The study was in response to a demonstration and education initiative, "Improving Hypertensive Care for Inner City Minorities", which was reviewed and approved by the Clinical Applications and Prevention Advisory Committee in April 1992 and by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council in May 1992. The Request for Applications was released in October 1992.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The program consisted of a community wide education program, an intensive intervention directed toward individuals with hypertension, and an intervention for health care providers. The program was developed by a coalition of community organizations. In the community wide educational intervention, a baseline household survey was used to identify barriers to hypertension control in the community. This information was used in planning the intervention strategies, targeting the educational efforts, and developing the educational messages. Existing community organizations (churches, local media, neighborhood organizations, etc) were used to implement educational efforts over a three year period. Program success was evaluated by comparing findings on a follow-up household survey with those at baseline. Level of blood pressure control was the primary outcome measure. For the intensive educational program for hypertensives, the investigators developed a hypertension registry of individuals with high blood pressure who were identified from a number of community sources. All individuals on the registry receive educational material through the mail. Individuals with uncontrolled hypertension were randomized to receive the usual mailed educational materials or a more intensive personalized 12 month intervention using lay health advisors.

In the evaluation, the investigators compared blood pressure control morbidity and mortality between these two intervention arms of the registry. The innovative educational approach to health care providers utilized the existing community-based Area Health Education Center (AHEC) network to communicate community-determined hypertension control needs and community-determined hypertension control strategies to health care providers and students. The research was designed to elucidate community factors in the inner city that dictated strategies necessary for success in a variety inner city environments. Specifically, the investigators examined the effect of community size and level of community stress (as indicated by poverty, crime, etc.) on program development and outcome. To do this, they implemented the program in one city-wide community (Milwaukee) and in three well defined, homogeneous inner city neighborhoods of Chicago which had differing levels of community stress indicators. They evaluated the effect of size and community stress levels on the program strategies and successes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

African-Americans with or without hypertension

Description

No eligibility criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Hypertensive
described as hypertensive according to AHA guidelines at time of trial
Controls
described as non-hypertensive according to AHA guidelines at time of trial

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jane Kotchen, Medical College of Wisconsin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 1993

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2000

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2000

First Posted (Estimate)

May 26, 2000

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4278

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

to be published

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Diseases

3
Subscribe