- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00160446
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Three Asoprisnil Doses in the Treatment of Women With Endometriosis
May 27, 2008 updated by: Abbott
A Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of J867 Administered in Patients With Endometriosis
The objective of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of three doses of asoprisnil, compared to placebo, in the treatment of women with endometriosis.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Endometriosis, the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, is a progressive, estrogen-dependent disease that occurs in menstruating women of reproductive age.
Although all major endometriosis therapies are effective for the treatment of pain, no single treatment is superior to others in terms of efficacy.
The major drawbacks of the current medical therapies are severe side effects such as hot flushes and osteoporosis.
The objective of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of asoprisnil 5, 10, and 25 mg tablets, compared to placebo, administered daily for 12 weeks to women with endometriosis, by assessing whether asoprisnil administration diminishes the pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, excessive bleeding, and analgesic use associated with this disease and lessens the subjects' perceived pain symptoms.
Otherwise healthy women with surgically confirmed endometriosis will be enrolled.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
130
Phase
- Phase 2
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Surgically confirmed endometriosis
- History of menstrual cycles between 26 and 32 days
- Otherwise in good health
- Age 18-40 years, inclusive
Subject had pain graded at Screening and Day 1 according to a scale suggested by Biberoglu and Berhman5 in at least one of the following categories:
- moderate or severe pelvic pain not related to menstruation, OR
- moderate or severe dysmenorrhea, OR
- moderate or severe pelvic tenderness elicited on pelvic examination accompanied by non-menstrual pelvic pain.
- Subject agrees to double barrier method of contraception
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any abnormal lab or procedure result the study-doctor considers important
- History of undiagnosed uterine bleeding or gynecological disorder
- Severe reaction(s) to hormone therapy
- History of osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease
- Subject currently breast feeding
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: 1
|
10 mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 weeks
25 mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 weeks
5mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 weeks
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: 2
|
10 mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 weeks
25 mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 weeks
5mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 weeks
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: 3
|
10 mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 weeks
25 mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 weeks
5mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 weeks
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: 4
|
Tablet, oral Daily for 12 weeks
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Pain (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain) measured by daily diary
Time Frame: Mean change from baseline to Months 1, 2, 3
|
Mean change from baseline to Months 1, 2, 3
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Global efficacy question
Time Frame: Final visit
|
Final visit
|
|
Pain (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain) pelvic tenderness and induration evaluated during office visits using modified Biberoglu and Behrman grading scale
Time Frame: Each monthly visit
|
Each monthly visit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2000
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
July 1, 2001
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
July 1, 2001
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2005
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 8, 2005
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
September 12, 2005
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
May 29, 2008
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 27, 2008
Last Verified
May 1, 2008
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- M99-110
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.