CT Perfusion Scans for Assessment of Lung Cancer Before and After Chemo +/- Radiotherapy

May 3, 2017 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Dynamic CT Perfusion for Assessment of Lung Cancer Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemo-/ Radiotherapy

Cancer of the lung is treated with surgery, radiation or chemotherapy, depending on the stage or extent of the disease. Some patients are treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy before surgery to improve the results of surgery. After these treatments, we do not know whether the residual tumour tissue is still alive or dead, which is why some physicians feel that surgery is required to remove it.

This study is designed to assess if computed tomography (CT, CAT-scan) enhanced with intravenous contrast agent (dye) can characterize a lung cancer, and say whether it is alive or dead. The researchers hope that in the future such a contrast-enhanced CAT-scan will make surgery less often necessary or improve the results of chemotherapy and/or radiation given before surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed study will be performed in patients with a proven lung cancer for whom induction therapy and subsequent surgical resection of any kind is planned. Kinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT will performed using the CT Perfusion 3 software (General Electric Medical Systems), yielding parameters characterizing tumor microvasculature in terms of the vascularity, or the blood volume (BV), the tumor perfusion or blood flow (BF), and the immaturity of the vascular wall, in terms of the microvascular permeability (permeability surface area, PS).

To test the assumption that dynamic CT-assessed tumor microvascular characteristics represent reliable, user-independent and reproducible parameters, microvascular values and parameter maps will be derived from two independent observers. To address the interobserver variability, each study will be analyzed by the PI and by a second researcher (blinded to the results of the PI). Kappa-statistics will be used to assess inter-rater concordance.

To test the hypothesis that the microvascular parameters obtained from dynamic contrast-enhanced CT predict the response to induction therapy, the parameters BV, BF and PS obtained prior to any treatment will be correlated with the histological result from the resected specimen (path CR or path non-CR). Spearman correlation will be used to compare non-parametric histology results with quantitative CT microvascular parameters.

To test the hypothesis that the microvascular parameters obtained from dynamic contrast-enhanced CT reflect the response to induction therapy, the parameters BV, BF and PS obtained after completion of induction treatment will be correlated with the histological result from the resected specimen (path CR or path non-CR). Spearman correlation will be used to compare non-parametric histology results with quantitative CT microvascular parameters.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
        • University Health Network

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer
  • Patients who are scheduled for any neo-adjuvant treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Females who are known to be pregnant or nursing
  • Patients with a history of adverse reaction to previous contrast agent administration
  • Patients with known renal disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: CT perfusion scan
contrast-enhanced dynamic CT perfusion study pre treatment and post treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
-Analysis will be performed to yield quantitative, absolute estimates of blood volume, blood flow, and microvascular permeability.
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heidi C Roberts, MD, University Health Network, Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe