Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Staging of Cervix Cancer

July 10, 2017 updated by: TROG Administrator, Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group

Prospective Study to Determine the Relationships Between Survival and FIGO Stage, Tumour Volume and Corpus Invasion in Cervical Cancer

The researchers propose that it may be corpus invasion, rather than tumour volume per se, which is one of the important determinants of ultimate outcome in cervix cancer. The aim of the proposed prospective, multicentre study, is to confirm the results of our retrospective studies, specifically that corpus invasion or tumour volume or both contribute important prognostic information over and above that provided by the currently used International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. A successful outcome would have important implications for the staging, and management as well as the biologic understanding of the behaviour of cervical cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This will be a prospective, multicentre, prognostic factor, follow-up study. The study is designed to be as simple as possible: newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients will have key prognostic variables collected at baseline. The treatment received will be documented at the end of treatment and patients will then be followed for first relapse and survival.

Registration of a patient on this study can be undertaken after EUA, biopsy confirmed diagnosis, anatomic staging diagram and MRI have been done and before any treatment has commenced.

Treatment must be curative in intent (termed radical therapy) but otherwise can be at the discretion of the investigator. Radical hysterectomy alone, hysterectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, radical chemo-radiotherapy or radical radiotherapy will be allowed. Details of the planned and given treatment regimen will be recorded.

All patients will have the following trial data documented at the time of registration:

  • Age
  • ECOG performance status
  • smoking status
  • date of histological diagnosis
  • histologic type and features
  • presenting haemoglobin
  • standard FIGO staging
  • maximum clinical tumour diameter measured at EUA
  • detailed staging diagram drawn at EUA
  • nodal status (by surgical pathology or CT or MRI or both and PET if available)
  • date of MRI
  • MRI tumour diameters
  • presence or absence of corpus invasion on MRI
  • planned treatment details

All patients will be assessed pre-treatment, immediately following treatment and will be followed up for local control and survival at yearly intervals from the date of registration.

It is intended to collect follow up information on all patients until one year after the final patient is registered on study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

109

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia, 1871
        • Liverpool Hospital
      • Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia, 2298
        • Calvary Mater Newcastle
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2069
        • Royal North Shore Hospital
      • Wentworthville, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
        • Westmead Hospital
    • Queensland
      • Herston, Queensland, Australia, 4029
        • Royal Brisbane Hospital
      • Townsville, Queensland, Australia, 4810
        • North Queensland Oncology Service
      • Tugun, Queensland, Australia, 4224
        • Premion - Tugun
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
        • Royal Adelaide Hospital
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3002
        • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
      • Mumbai, India
        • Tata Memorial Hospital
      • Tamil Nadu, India
        • Meenakshi Mission Hospital
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1001
        • Auckland Hospital
      • Christchurch, New Zealand, 4710
        • Christchurch Hospital
      • Dunedin, New Zealand
        • Dunedin Hospital
      • Singapore, Singapore
        • National University Hospital
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients, Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Newly diagnosed, biopsy proven carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
  2. Squamous cell, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous or large cell carcinoma histology.
  3. FIGO Stage Ib -IVa.
  4. Maximum clinical tumour diameter recorded.
  5. MRI done within 30 days prior to registration.
  6. Intention to treat radically
  7. Treatment not yet started.
  8. Written informed consent.
  9. Available for follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Lymphoma, small cell carcinoma and melanoma histology.
  2. Previous hysterectomy
  3. Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
1
Cervical Cancer Patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assess the prognostic significance, with respect to overall survival, of the factors, FIGO stage. Overall survival is defined as the date of registration to date of death from any cause.
Time Frame: End of study
End of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Gerard Adams, Oceania Oncology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe