Concentric Retriever Device (CRD) in Acute Ischemic Stroke

December 10, 2015 updated by: Sidney Starkman

A Single-Center Controlled Registry to Evaluate the Concentric Retriever System for the Treatment of Stroke

The primary purpose is to study the safety and effectiveness of the Concentric Retriever Device(CRD)in ischemic stroke patients who undergo clot retrieval with the CRD within 8 hours of stroke symptom onset. The CRD has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to retrieve foreign bodies (such as pieces of metal) from blood vessels in the body. The CRD is a small metal wire with a loop at the end (like a corkscrew) that removes clots from arteries and thereby restores blood flow to the brain. Prior versions of the CRD may have been too soft to pull out clots, just as a corkscrew that is too soft would not pull out corks. The current version of the CRD is not as soft and may be more effective in retrieving clots. Hypothesis: By restoring blood flow to the brain, stroke symptoms may get better or the stroke may be prevented from getting worse.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary objective is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Concentric Retriever in the treatment of thrombotic occlusions originating in the internal carotid, middle cerebral (M1 and M2 segments), basilar, posterior cerebral or vertebral arteries. A maximum of 50 patients may be enrolled at a single site, University of California, Los Angeles.

Primary endpoints: Achievement of recanalization (TIMI/TICI grade II or III flow) immediately post procedure without occurrence of major complications will be assessed. Major complications are defined as vessel perforation, intramural arterial dissection, symptomatic intra-cranial hemorrhage, and significant embolization in a previously uninvolved arterial territory.

Secondary endpoints: Assessment of patient's neurological condition and functional state using the NIHSS, Barthel Index, and Modified Rankin at 30 and 90 days post-procedure. A composite of major adverse events at 30 and 90 days post-procedure will be reported. Major adverse events are defined as death and new stroke.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90024
        • University of California, Los Angeles

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1(a) -Patients who present within 8 hours of stroke onset and are not candidates for treatment with t-PA who have clinical signs consistent with the diagnosis of ischemic stroke such as impairment of language, motor function, sensation, cognition, and/or gaze, or vision.

1(b). Patients who have had an acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy where vascular imaging (TCD, CTA, MRA, angiography) shows a persistent occlusion after the end of the infusion treatment.

2. Patients > 18 years of age. 3. NIHSSS > 7 4. Angiogram shows a thrombotic occlusion originating in the internal carotid, middle cerebral (M1 or M2 segment), basilar, posterior cerebral, or vertebral arteries.

5. Patient/patient guardian is willing to comply with the protocol requirements and return to the treatment center for all required clinical evaluations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is pregnant (if within child bearing age).
  2. Patient has baseline glucose of < 50mg/dL (<50 mg/mM).
  3. Patient has excessive arterial tortuosity that precludes the device from reaching the target area.
  4. Patient has known hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or oral anticoagulant therapy with INR > 2.0.
  5. Patient received Heparin within 48 hours with a PTT greater than 2 times the lab normal.
  6. Patient has baseline platelets < 30,000.
  7. Patient has history of severe allergy to intra-arterial contrast medium.
  8. Patient has severe, sustained hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 185 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure > 110 mm Hg).

    NOTE: If the blood pressure can be successfully reduced and maintained at the acceptable level using medication (i.e. Nipride), the patient can be enrolled.

  9. CT Scan or MRI reveals significant mass effect with midline shift.
  10. Patient's angiogram shows an arterial stenosis (>50%) proximal to the embolus.
  11. Patient's anticipated life expectancy is less than 3 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Achievement of recanalization (TIMI/TICI grade II or III flow) immediately post procedure.
In addition, major complications defined as vessel perforation, intramural arterial dissection, symptomatic intra-cranial hemorrhage, and significant embolization in a previously uninvolved arterial territory will be tabulated.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Assessment of patient's neurological condition and functional state using the NIHSS, Barthel Index, and
Modified Rankin at 30 and 90 days post-procedure.
A composite of major adverse events at 30 and 90 days post-procedure. Major adverse events are defined as death and new stroke.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 20, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 14, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe