Treatment of Adults Aged Up to 60 Years With De Novo Acute Myeloblastic Leukaemia,Secondary AML, or RAEB-T

November 17, 2005 updated by: Hannover Medical School

Protocol for the Treatment of Adults Aged </= 60 Years With De Novo Acute Myeloblastic Leukaemia or Secondary AML or RAEB-T (AML 01/99 Trial)

This randomized phase II/III trial investigates the antileukemic activity and toxicity of the FLAG-Ida regimen as a second induction course in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and bad response to the first induction cycle and/or with a high risk karyotype and compares the antileukemic activity and toxicity of high dose cytarabine/daunorubicin vs. autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation as late consolidation therapy in standard risk patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Assessment of the antileukemic activity and toxicity of the FLAG-Ida regimen as a second induction course in patients with bad response to the first induction cycle and/or with a high risk karyotype.

Optimization of the late consolidation therapy in standard risk patients (SR) by a prospective randomized trial comparing a high-dose cytarabine/daunorubicin (HD-Ara-C/DNR) based late consolidation therapy with an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT)

Assessment of the antileukemic activity of the different treatment elements by monitoring residual disease (MRD) after induction, early and late consolidation by Real-time PCR

Assessment of the prognostic relevance of minimal residual disease by quantification of the residual leukemic burden in haematological remission by Real-time PCR during follow-up

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

200

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
        • Hannover Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 60 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of de-novo AML, FAB M 1, 2, 4 - 7
  • diagnosis of secondary AML after chemo-/radiotherapy or MDS
  • diagnosis of RAEB-T
  • age between 16 and 60 years (including 60 years)
  • women after exclusion of pregnancy
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with severe disease of the heart (e.g. cardial failure NYHA III/IV; history of myocardial infarction within the last 6 months;severe ventricular arrythmias (Lown III to IV)
  • patients with DLCO < 50%
  • patients with creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min
  • patients with bilirubin > 2mg% (34.2 mmol/L)
  • patients with severe complications of the leukaemia such as uncontrolled bleeding, pneumonia with hypoxia or shock
  • patients with a psychiatric, addictive, or any disorder which compromises ability to give truly informed consent for participating in this study
  • HIV positivity
  • patients with a t(15;17) translocation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Efficacy and toxicity of FLAG-Ida as second induction course in high risk patients.
Efficacy and toxicity of high-dose cytarabin/daunorubicin (HD-Ara-C/DNR) based late consolidation therapy vs. autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in standard risk patients.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Monitoring residual disease (MRD) after induction, early and late consolidation by Real-time PCR.
Assessment of the prognostic relevance of minimal residual disease by quantification of minimal residual disease.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 1999

Study Completion

September 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2005

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 21, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 18, 2005

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2005

Last Verified

September 1, 2005

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe