A Study to Compare Ventral Incisional Hernia by Laparoscopic vs Open Repair With Mesh

September 15, 2010 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Ventral Incisional Hernia Repair: Comparison Of Laparoscopic and Open Repair With Mesh

The purpose of this research is to compare open ventral incisional hernia repair to the laparoscopic repair with respect to complications, recurrence, pain, return to normal activities of daily living, and return to work.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The appearance of ventral incisional hernia (VIH) following an open abdominal operation is an important postoperative problem. While advances in anesthesia techniques, better methods to prevent surgical infections, and improved treatment of infection, and the use of new suture materials have reduced the incidence of incisional hernias, incisional hernias still occurs in 0.5-11% of all open abdominal surgical procedures performed.

Overview of study design: We are conducting a 4 center randomized clinical trial to compare the outcomes of two methods of surgical management of ventral incisional hernia. Patients presenting to a physician with a ventral incisional hernia will be considered for the trial. The study is designed to compare the rate of complications, pain, time to return to normal activities, Health related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient satisfaction between laparoscopic and open mesh repair for ventral incisional hernia. The rate of recurrence of the hernia at 1-2 years will be evaluated as a secondary outcome. Four VA medical centers with the capability of enrolling 40-50 patients a year have been selected based on volume, experience with open and laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy and experience in the conduct of clinical trials. Patients are recruited by physicians at each site and referred to the site coordinator who screens them for eligibility. The trial is randomized but not blinded. The randomization scheme takes into consideration that random allocation of patients to each study group is made within each center. In addition to the participating center, the other baseline variables that serve as stratification factors are first time or recurrent ventral incisional hernia and patient with a body mass index greater or less than 35arm.

Timeline: The trial consists of 3 phases: Implementation, Patient intake and follow-up, closeout and final analysis. 1-Implementation (2 months): The implementation which will include funding, recruitment of the nurse coordinators and review of the study protocol and techniques of operation was 2 months in duration. 2-Patient intake and follow up (32 months): All study patients are recruited during that period of time. Follow-up will occur simultaneously and will end at close out. The range of follow-up is expected to range from 8 weeks to 34 months. 4-Final analysis and closeout: The participating centers will be given 2 months of funding to close out the data collection. During this period, all final follow-up visits and data collection will be completed. Final analysis will run concurrently with closeout.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02130
        • VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients will be eligible for enrollment into the study if they meet the following criteria: -Are 18 years of age or older -Have a diagnosis of ventral primary incisional hernia 9-225 cm2 in size. -Give informed consent for randomization - Have a negative pregnancy test. (Women)

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded for the following reasons: -Hernia cannot be detected on physical examination - Primary ventral or umbilical hernia - Small hernia defined as less than 9 cm2 - Giant hernia defined as greater than 225 cm2 in size - ASA class 4 or 5, or contraindications to general anesthesia - Severe co morbid conditions likely to limit survival to less than 3 years - History of malignancy within the past 5 years except for non-melanoma skin cancer - Cirrhosis with or without ascites - Presence of bowel obstruction( partial or intermittent), strangulation, peritonitis, or perforation. - Presence of local or systemic infection - Participation in another clinical trial - Emergency operation - Prisoner

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 1
For the open procedure, the technique, as described by Chevrel and others was adopted.
For the laparoscopic repair, the method of Gagner was adopted

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall complication rates at eight weeks and the odds of complications, adjusted for study site, body mass index, and hernia type
Time Frame: Eight (8) weeks post-operatively
Eight (8) weeks post-operatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compare pain, return to normal activities of daily living, and return to work. Health related quality of life, and recurrence.
Time Frame: One (1) and two (2) years post-operatively
One (1) and two (2) years post-operatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kamal Itani, MD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2010

Last Verified

September 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe