- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00249275
Effectiveness of Alternative Approaches to Providing Spectacles in Tanzanian Secondary School Students
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Alternative Approaches to Providing Spectacles in Secondary School Students in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Introduction Worldwide uncorrected significant refractive errors (RE) are among the commonest causes of visual impairment. This combined with the effectiveness and simplicity of correcting RE by providing spectacles has made the correction of RE one of the priorities of Vision 2020. However, little information is available on effective strategies for identifying and delivering optical services to affected individuals in developing countries
Aim The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two interventions, namely providing free spectacles or only a prescription to students with insufficiently corrected or uncorrected significant refractive errors
Objectives
- To estimate the prevalence and type of significant refractive errors in secondary school children in Tanzania, and to determine the unmet need for spectacles
- To compare the effectiveness of providing free spectacles vs. offering only a prescription. This was judged as the proportion of students needing spectacles who were wearing spectacles at 3 and at 6 months after prescription
- To explore attitudes to spectacles and reasons for non-compliance
Methods The study took place in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania between January and September 2004. 52 schools were randomly selected into 2 intervention groups (Group A and B) using random selection stratified by school status (government vs. private). Students were screened for significant refractive errors. A socio-economic questionnaire was administered to all the students. Students who needed spectacles in Group A schools received free spectacles (intervention A), while students in group B schools received only a prescription for spectacles (intervention B). Students were followed up 3 and 6 months after spectacles provision/prescription to check their compliance and to explore reasons for non-compliance.
Main analyses of data were the prevalence of visual impairment and its causes, risk factors for myopia, and compliance with spectacles at 3 and at 6 months.
Results
Prevalence of impaired visual acuity and causes 6,904 students were screened by the eye team. 2.9% of students had uncorrected poor VA, 2.3% had poor presenting VA and 0.6% still had poor VA with best correction. The main cause of visual impairment was significant refractive error (84%).
The prevalence of uncorrected significant RE in secondary school students in Dar es Salaam was low at 1.8%. Even assuming that all students with unconfirmed poor presenting screening eyesight (0.8%) had uncorrected significant RE which is unlikely the maximum prevalence would be estimated at 2.6%.
Compliance with spectacles
Students who had actually purchased their spectacles were up to twice as likely to wear them at 3 and at 6 months as students who had received free spectacles, but only a small proportion had purchased them (3 months: 30%; 6 months: 45%). Only 46% of students who had received free spectacles wore them or had them at school at 3 months and 53% at 6 months. Significant independent predictors of students wearing or having their spectacles at school 3 to 6 months after prescription or provision of free spectacles were:
- Having to purchase spectacles (less likely, OR=0.07 to 0.42)
- Bilateral good presenting vision, such as mild refractive errors and undercorrected significant errors (less likely than unilateral visual impairment) and unilateral visual impairment (less likely than bilateral visual impairment; OR=0.47 for each step)
- Myopia compared to astigmatism and hyperopia, both severe enough to impair distance vision (more likely, OR= 68 -infinity) The majority of students who were going to purchase spectacles seemed to purchase them soon after prescription.
- Risk factors for myopia Female sex, non-African ethnicity and a professional mother were independent significant risk factors for myopia in this population. These findings are similar to risk factors for myopia found in other populations.
Conclusions/ Recommendation
- Significant refractive errors were the most common cause of avoidable visual impairment in Tanzanian secondary school students in Dar es Salaam. However, the prevalence of uncorrected bilateral and unilateral significant refractive errors in Form 1 students was low (less than 3%) which makes the value of screening for RE in this population questionable. Screening seems even less justified if one considers that only about 46% of students who had been provided with free spectacles wore spectacles or had them at school three months later. If students were asked to purchase spectacles, this proportion was even lower at 26%.
- Similar studies in different cultural settings are needed to explore the compliance with and reasons of non-compliance with spectacles in children, as poor compliance makes the value of any screening programme questionable.
Study Type
Enrollment
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- Secondary Schools
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- clinical diagnosis of un- or undercorrected significant refractive error
- form 1 student in participating secondary schools
Exclusion Criteria:
- presenting VA of 6/12 or better in both eyes and no hyperopia of +2D or higher
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
---|
The proportion of students who had been given/prescribed spectacles who were wearing spectacles 3 and 6 months later
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Clare Gilbert, Reader, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ITCRBY79
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Under- and Uncorrected Significant Refractive Errors
-
Alcon ResearchCompletedRefractive Error
-
Alcon ResearchCompletedRefractive Error
-
Tianjin Eye HospitalAlexandria University; Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University and other collaboratorsUnknown
-
Alcon ResearchCompleted
-
Alcon ResearchCompleted
-
KK Women's and Children's HospitalWithdrawnRefractive Error - Myopia
-
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesUnknownRefractive ErrorsIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Tianjin Eye HospitalRecruitingMyopia; Refractive ErrorChina
-
Alcon ResearchCompletedRefractive Error | Myopia | Hyperopia
Clinical Trials on spectacles
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityUnknown
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Health and Medical Research Council, AustraliaCompletedAstigmatism | Myopia | HyperopiaChina, India
-
Essilor InternationalQueensland University of TechnologyCompleted
-
Avulux, Inc.Completed
-
Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment CenterBrien Holden VisionRecruitingBlindness,Visual Impairment, Refractive Error, Cataract, High Myopia, AgingChina
-
Coopervision, Inc.CompletedAmetropiaUnited Kingdom
-
Centre for Eye and Vision ResearchThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University; University of WaterlooRecruiting
-
Queen's University, BelfastUniversity of Ulster; University of Zimbabwe; L.V. Prasad Eye Institute; Clearly; New England College of Optometry and other collaboratorsCompletedHyperopia | Long SightZimbabwe
-
Jaeb Center for Health ResearchNational Eye Institute (NEI)Completed