A Randomized Study to Compare Polysomnography With Overnight Home Oximetry and Auto - CPAP for Sleep Apnea

November 10, 2005 updated by: University of British Columbia

A Randomized Study to Compare Polysomnography With Overnight Home Oximetry and Auto - CPAP for Diagnosis and Nasal CPAP Titration in Patients With a High Probability of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

This study will look at an alternative new pathway for diagnosis and treatment based on simple procedures in the patient's own home compared with the current conventional laboratory based pathway. The purpose is to determine whether all patients with OSA require the more elaborate laboratory procedures, or whether a subgroup can be managed more simply.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The research question we are exploring is whether the conventional approach is better in terms of successful treatment, compliance with treatment, and quality of life. There will be 2 arms to the study. Subject will be randomly assigned to either one of the following two treatment options: 1) the conventional investigation and nasal CPAP treatment pathway comprising 2 overnight sleep studies, one for diagnosis and one for determining the required level of nasal CPAP treatment 2) experimental pathway that uses a simplified home study (overnight oximetry), together with a machine that automatically adjusts the nasal CPAP pressure to the required amount, and a careful follow-up during the first 2 weeks of treatment.

Procedures: The study protocol will require the subject to complete the following procedures which are part of routine clinical practice: History and Physical Examination by a physician, Home Oximetry (This simple test involves wearing an oxygen probe gently wrapped around subject's finger during a night's sleep to continuously measure the amount of oxygen in blood and detect obstructions of subject's breathing. The probe is easily applied by the subject and requires no supervision), Spirometry (simple non-invasive breathing test), Standardized Sleepiness Questionnaires, Orientation and Education regarding nasal CPAP therapy, and compliance monitoring, Overnight polysomnography (This is the procedure that requires subject to spend a night in the sleep laboratory with a variety of painless and non-invasive monitoring devices attached to the body. The purpose is to obtain detailed information about subject's sleep quality, breathing, heart function, and body movements during sleep. Subject will be continuously monitored by a trained technologist during this procedure.). The following procedures are not routine and subject may be required to complete some or all of them depending on which pathway assigned to. Follow-up visits to the Clinic on Days 7 and 14 of nasal CPAP treatment for adjustments of nasal CPAP pressure as required (this could also be done at home), Repeat Home Oximetry as required, Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
        • Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Respiratory Division

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Age > 18 years

  • Residence in the Lower Mainland
  • History and physical examination findings compatible with OSAHS
  • Normal spirometry. (This is necessary to avoid decreased specificity of overnight oximetry attributable to underlying lung disease)
  • Epworth Sleepiness Scale > 10

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Other known disorders that cause daytime sleepiness
  • Requiring sedative/hypnotic medications
  • Psychiatric disorder
  • Life threatening co-morbidity e.g. chronic lung disease, coronary artery disease - unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction, heart failure, seizure disorder, and previous motor vehicle accident attributed to hypersomnolence
  • Language barrier
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Contraindication to nasal CPAP therapy
  • Previous treatment of OSAHS with nasal CPAP, oral appliance therapy or corrective upper airway surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
The primary outcome measurement will be apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) during a full night polysomnogram performed on the effective nasal CPAP pressure after 3 months of nasal CPAP therapy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
1. The study will also compare CPAP pressure between the two groups after 3 months of therapy.
2. This study will compare Epworth Sleepiness Score, arousal index and sleep efficiency index between the two groups after 3 months of therapy.
3. This study will compare Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index between the two groups after 3 months of therapy.
4. It will compare the change in Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index from baseline to follow-up between the two groups.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frank Ryan, MD, University of British Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Completion

December 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

November 15, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 15, 2005

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2005

Last Verified

November 1, 2005

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe