Erlotinib, Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin Combined With Radiation Therapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

July 17, 2020 updated by: Nathan Pennell, MD, PhD

A Phase I/II Trial of Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and OSI-774 (Tarceva) With Concurrent Accelerated Hyperfractionation Radiation Followed by Maintenance Therapy With OSI-774 for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

RATIONALE: Erlotinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving erlotinib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin together with radiation therapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. Giving these treatments after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery.

PURPOSE: This phase I/II trial is studying the best dose of erlotinib and the side effects of erlotinib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin when given together with radiation therapy and to see how well they work in treating patients who are undergoing surgery for stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Assess the safety and feasibility of erlotinib hydrochloride, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in combination with accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer.
  • Determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose of erlotinib hydrochloride in these patients.
  • Assess the safety and tolerability of long-term maintenance erlotinib hydrochloride after completion of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in these patients.

Secondary

  • Evaluate the clinical and pathological response rate in these patients after neoadjuvant erlotinib hydrochloride, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiotherapy.
  • Assess the impact of erlotinib hydrochloride on disease-free survival, overall survival, locoregional control, and distant metastatic control in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is an open-label, phase I dose-escalation study of erlotinib hydrochloride followed by a non-randomized phase II study.

Cohorts of 3-6 patients receive escalating doses of erlotinib hydrochloride until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is determined. The MTD is defined as the dose preceding that at which 2 of 3 or 2 of 6 patients experience dose-limiting toxicity.

  • Phase I:

    • Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Patients receive oral erlotinib hydrochloride once daily on days 1-28 and paclitaxel IV over 1 hour and carboplatin IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients concurrently undergo radiotherapy twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12. Patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease proceed to surgery. Patients who develop a medical contraindication to surgery (i.e., medically unresectable) receive a second course of erlotinib hydrochloride, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiotherapy as above within 2 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Cohorts of 3-6 patients receive escalating doses of erlotinib hydrochloride until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is determined. The MTD is defined as the dose preceding that at which 2 of 3 or 2 of 6 patients experience dose-limiting toxicity.

  • Surgery: Within 4 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, patients undergo surgical resection and then proceed to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
  • Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Within 6-8 weeks after surgery, patients receive a second course of erlotinib hydrochloride, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiotherapy as in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
  • Maintenance therapy: All patients receive oral erlotinib hydrochloride once daily for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

    • Phase II: Patients receive treatment as in phase I with erlotinib hydrochloride at the MTD.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 42 patients will be accrued for this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer

    • Surgically determined stage IIIA or IIIB disease
    • Histology from an involved mediastinal or supraclavicular lymph nodes alone will be allowed if a separate distal primary lesion is clearly evident on radiographs

      • Histological or cytological proof of mediastinal nodal involvement by mediastinoscopy, Chamberlain procedure, thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, or CT-guided biopsy is required except for cases of paralysis of left true vocal cord with separate left lung primary distinct from enlarged nodes > 1 cm in the anterior-posterior window seen on the CT scan
  • Patients with N3 or T4 status must be evaluated and deemed potentially resectable after induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy
  • Measurable and evaluable disease
  • No malignant pleural effusion except for effusion visible only on CT scan and deemed too small to tap
  • No pericardial effusion
  • No small or mixed small cell/non-small cell lung cancer
  • No massive lesions requiring radiation to the entire lung
  • No metastatic cancer to the lungs

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • ECOG performance status 0-1
  • WBC ≥ 3,000/mm^3
  • Platelet count > 100,000/mm^3
  • Serum creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
  • Alkaline phosphatase, AST, and ALT < 2 times upper limit of normal
  • Albumin > 3.0 g/dL
  • Serum bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dL
  • Adequate pulmonary function
  • No clinical evidence of another uncontrolled malignancy
  • No requirement for urgent therapy for severe local symptoms such as post-obstructive pneumonia

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • No prior chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or immunotherapy for lung cancer
  • No prior surgery to treat the cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dose Level A

Erlotinib, Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin with Radiation

Dose Level A: 50 mg OSI-774/50 mg/m2 Paclitaxel/2 AUC Carboplatin

conventional surgery
AUC2 weekly x 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • Carbo
Daily
Other Names:
  • Tarceva
  • OSI-774
50mg/m2/weekly x 3 weeks
150 cGy bid
Experimental: Dose Level B

Erlotinib, Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin with Radiation

Dose Level B: 100 mg OSI-774/50 mg/m2 Paclitaxel/2 AUC Carboplatin

conventional surgery
AUC2 weekly x 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • Carbo
Daily
Other Names:
  • Tarceva
  • OSI-774
50mg/m2/weekly x 3 weeks
150 cGy bid
Experimental: Dose Level C

Erlotinib, Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin with Radiation

Dose Level C: 150 mg OSI-774/50 mg/m2 Paclitaxel/2 AUC Carboplatin

conventional surgery
AUC2 weekly x 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • Carbo
Daily
Other Names:
  • Tarceva
  • OSI-774
50mg/m2/weekly x 3 weeks
150 cGy bid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Tolerated Dose of Erlotinib Hydrochloride (Phase I)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery
The Phase I portion of this study is to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of combining OSI-774 with the paclitaxel-carboplatin chemoradiation protocol and to assess the safety and feasiblity of this combination.
2 weeks after surgery
Tolerability of Long-term OSI-774 (Phase II)
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of patients who experienced grade >/= 3 toxicities on maintanance erolotinib (OSI-774)
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathological Complete Response Rate
Time Frame: 2 years

Number of participants with an pathological complete response rate using the RECIST criteria.

Complete response: Disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease Partial response: A 30% or greater decline in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions compared to the baseline measurement.

Progressive disease: A 20% or greater increase in the sum of the longest diameter of the target lesions compared to the baseline.

Stable disease: Disease that did not meet the criteria for a CR / PR or progressive disease.

2 years
Overall Survival
Time Frame: 3 years
Percent of participants still alive from the date of study entry to the date of the corresponding event (recurrence of death) or the date of final follow-up.
3 years
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 3 years
Months from the date of study entry to the date of the corresponding event (recurrence of death) or the date of final follow-up
3 years
Locoregional Control
Time Frame: 2 years
Estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and summarized at various follow-up points as the number of patients remaining at risk, the event estimate, standard error, and median.From the date of study entry to the date of the corresponding event (recurrence of death) or the date of final follow-up, assessed up to 2 years
2 years
Distant Control
Time Frame: 2 years
Estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and summarized at various follow-up points as the number of patients remaining at risk, the event estimate, standard error, and median.From the date of study entry to the date of the corresponding event (recurrence of death) or the date of final follow-up, assessed up to 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Nathan Pennell, MD, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

January 18, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on conventional surgery

3
Subscribe