- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00337688
Power Wheelchair Joystick Use in Spastic Cerebral Palsy
September 13, 2011 updated by: University of Pittsburgh
Joystick Use for Virtual Electric Power Wheelchair Driving in Individuals With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
There are over 750,000 individuals in the U.S. with Cerebral Palsy (CP).
Up to 46% of adults with CP report limited mobility in their communities.
However, upper limb spasticity and problems with movement can make the independent use of a wheelchair difficult.
Forty percent of individuals who desire mobility via electric wheelchairs are precluded from using them because of problems with upper limb function.
No studies to date have produced devices that definitively improve mobility for these individuals.
We will recruit 22 subjects with Spastic CP and 22 age and gender matched control subjects without apparent disability from advertisements, mailings, and outpatient clinics.
Both a conventional joystick (MSJ) and a novel joystick that is customized for each subject will each be used six different computer screen tasks that simulate driving a wheelchair on a path.
We will compare subjects and joysticks based on driving performance.
Understanding problems with driving will help us to design joysticks and other assistive devices, not only for CP but for Traumatic Brain Injury, Spinal Cord Injury, Parkinson's Disease, stroke, or a variety of other disabilities.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
There are over 750,000 individuals in the U.S. with Cerebral Palsy (CP).
Up to 46% of adults with CP report limited mobility in their communities.
However, upper limb spasticity and motor control impairment can make the independent use of a wheelchair difficult.
Forty percent of individuals who desire mobility via electric wheelchairs are precluded from using them because of problems with upper limb function including motor, sensory, or cognitive impairments that can make the use of a conventional joystick difficult.
No studies to date have produced devices that definitively improve mobility for these individuals.
We will recruit 22 subjects with Spastic CP and 22 age and gender matched control subjects without apparent disability from advertisements, mailings, and outpatient clinics.
Both a conventional motion sensing joystick (MSJ) and a novel isometric joystick that is customized for each subject will each be used to maneuver a sprite on a computer screen in six different tasks.
Each task involves a path with 90-degree turns.
Two tasks have paths that are completely visible to the subject, while four have paths that appear either immediately or at 1, 2, or 3 seconds ahead of the sprite.
Because subjects with CP and control subjects are likely to drive at different speeds, subjects will drive under conditions of freely chosen speed and with speed controlled at 1.2 m/s.
Joystick input signals that represent the sprite's velocity and position will be recorded.
Changes in direction and speed, average deviation from path center, number of boundary violations, start and stop reaction times, response times to turns, and duration of subject movement will be calculated.
We will use a Repeated Measures design, treating speed as a covariate under the condition when it is freely chosen.
We hypothesize that, regardless of joystick or speed condition, subjects with Spastic CP will have more direction and speed changes, greater average deviation from path center, more boundary violations, prolonged reaction times and response times to turns, and prolonged subject movement time compared to controls.
We hypothesize that, regardless of joystick or speed condition, decreasing warning time before turns will be correlated with more direction and speed changes, greater average deviation from path center, more boundary violations, and prolonged subject movement time and that the magnitude of these changes will be greater for those with Spastic CP.
We hypothesize that, regardless of speed condition, subjects with Spastic CP, when using a MSJ compared to the isometric joystick, will have more direction and speed changes, greater average path deviation, more boundary violations, and prolonged subject movement.
Understanding driving task deficits and warning time for movement decisions will help to identify customization parameters for joysticks and other assistive devices, not only for CP but for Traumatic Brain Injury, Spinal Cord Injury, Parkinson's Disease, stroke, or a variety of other disabilities.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
50
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
12 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
subjects with CP and controls
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- subjects must be between the ages of 12-80
- subjects must be able to give written informed consent or consent by proxy to participate
- subjects with the diagnosis of CP must have a score of 2 or 3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale in at least one of the following in the operating limb: wrist flexors, wrist extensors, elbow flexors, or elbow extensors
- control subjects must have a Modified Ashworth score of 0 for all of the above muscle groups in both upper limbs
- subjects must have the minimal motor ability necessary to participate in the trial. This will be measured as follows: after 3 trials, subjects must be able to complete a basic virtual driving with an average minimum speed of no less than 1.2 m/s, an average trial time of no more than 18 seconds, and an average deviation of the center of the virtual wheelchair of no more than 1.5 m from the path center, for each of the two joysticks used. These values are derived from Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standard dimensions and human walking speed.
Exclusion Criteria:
- subjects who are not able to tolerate sitting for 2 hours (the estimated length of the experiment)
- subjects who have active pelvic or thigh wounds (they may be worsened by prolonged sitting)
- subjects with a history of seizures in the last 90 days (uncontrolled seizures may be induced by a computer screen task)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Control
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Brad Dicianno, MD, Human Engineering Research Laboratories
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2006
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2008
Study Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2006
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 14, 2006
First Posted (Estimate)
June 16, 2006
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
September 14, 2011
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 13, 2011
Last Verified
September 1, 2011
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0512006
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.