Improving Blood Pressure Management in Patients With Diabetes (SCRIP-HTN)

December 7, 2007 updated by: University of Alberta

Improving Blood Pressure Management in Patients With Diabetes: SCRIP-HTN

About 22% of Canadians have high blood pressure, or hypertension. However, studies have shown that only 1 out of 5 people with hypertension have their blood pressure controlled.

Diabetes is also an important risk factor for heart disease and stroke. About half of people with diabetes also have hypertension - a deadly combination. Studies have shown that only about 1 in 10 people with diabetes have their blood pressure controlled adequately - clearly something needs to be done to improve this.

Heart disease, stroke, hypertension, and diabetes are conditions that occur in the community, so we need to explore innovative solutions that will work in the community. Pharmacists are well-placed in the community to help identify people with diabetes and hypertension. This has worked very well in previous studies in patients with high cholesterol levels. Pharmacists and nurses have complementary skills which, when working as a team, may help identify and better manage hypertension in people with diabetes.

Our main objective is to test whether a community pharmacist and nurse team can improve blood pressure control in people with diabetes and hypertension.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in Canada. Diabetes is a strong risk factor for CVD, accounting for 50%-75% of deaths (1). Almost half of patients with diabetes also have hypertension. Recent evidence suggests that blood pressure (BP) control is a more important target than blood glucose for the prevention of complications of diabetes, because reducing BP reduces the risks of both CVD and renal dysfunction (2-4). Despite this, and recommendations from national guidelines, BP control in individuals with diabetes is poor (5-10). We recently performed a systematic review of 43 studies, (72,237 patients), and observed that only about 40% achieve treatment targets (11). This is likely an overestimate, as all studies used BP targets higher than current recommendations. Community pharmacists and advanced nurse practitioners (ANP) are well-positioned to help identify and follow-up patients with diabetes and hypertension.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of a community-based multidisciplinary screening and intervention program on blood pressure control in patients with diabetes.

Design and Methods: Design: Subjects will be randomized to pharmacist/ANP intervention or usual care. Inclusion criteria: Adult patients with diabetes with a BP of >130/80 mm Hg on 2 consecutive visits 2 weeks apart. Exclusion criteria: patients who are institutionalized or unlikely/unable to comply with follow up visits. Procedures: Patients will be recruited via: 1) community pharmacies (patients identified by diabetes drug prescriptions), and 2) referrals via Capital Health Regional Diabetes Intake Program. Patients will be invited by telephone to attend an in-pharmacy clinic. At Visit #1, the ANP will complete a history and physical exam (including a BP taken using the BPTru® device, 6 readings performed 1 minutes apart in the non-dominant arm, with last 5 readings averaged) (12). The pharmacist will review each patient's medication history. If the averaged readings are >130/80 mm Hg, the patient will be invited to attend a 2nd clinic in 2 weeks. If the averaged BPs from both visits are >130/80 mm Hg, the patient will be approached for consent to participate in the randomized trial. Intervention group receives: a BP wallet card with discussion as to the meaning of the BP measures, CVD risk reduction counseling, a hypertension education pamphlet, and referral to their primary care physician for further assessment/management. The BP results will then be faxed along with any recommendations to the patient's primary care physician. Written recommendations from local opinion leaders will be used to reinforce the latest hypertension guidelines. Follow-up: Patients will be followed up at 6 weeks to ensure they have made an appointment with their physician and to re-measure BP. BP will be measured at 6-week intervals (Week 6, 12, 18 with faxing of BP results and recommendations to the primary care physician), with a final follow-up visit at Week 24. Usual care group receives: BP wallet card with recorded BP measures, a pamphlet on diabetes, general diabetes advice given by ANP and usual care by their physician. Follow-up: No scheduled follow up visits. One phone call to patient will occur at 12 weeks to inquire about changes to BP management. A final follow-up visit will occur at week 24 to re-evaluate BP and to offer the patients the intervention program.

Evaluation: Outcome measures: The primary endpoint is the difference in change in systolic BP between intervention and usual care groups at 6 months. Secondary endpoints will include: (1) change in antihypertensive therapy (new medication or dosage increase), (2) % patients achieving BP target of <130/80 mm Hg, and (3) % patients using ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists. Sample Size: A sample size of 85 patients per group will provide 90% power (assuming a standard deviation of 20mmHg and 2-sided alpha=0.05) to detect a 10mmHg difference in the primary endpoint. To account for drop-outs, we will increase this to 110 patients per group. Analysis: Demographic characteristics will be summarized using percentages for categorical variables and medians (interquartile range) for continuous variables. To compare the change in BP between intervention and usual care, we will use a 2-sample independent t-test. Significance of Study: Treatment and control of hypertension in people with diabetes is a major public health problem, and improving detection and control of hypertension is a major goal of the Canadian Hypertension Society. Novel ways of identification and treatment to guideline targets in this patient population are urgently needed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

227

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2C8
        • University of Alberta

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The following patients will be eligible for study participation:

  • Patients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Diabetes will be defined as those patients presently taking either oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin therapy (oral hypoglycemic agents to include all drugs in the drug classes of: alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, biguanides, meglitinides, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones and adjunctive therapy) taken for >6 months to rule-out steroid-induced diabetes and gestational diabetes.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded from the study if they:

  • Do not provide or are unable to provide written informed consent
  • Refuse or are unlikely to attend follow-up visits for BP measurements
  • Are institutionalized
  • Are <18 years of age
  • Do not understand English
  • Enrolled in other diabetes or hypertension trials

Subjects will be recruited whether or not they are receiving antihypertensive therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
difference in change in systolic BP between the intervention and usual care groups
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
change in antihypertensive therapy by new/additional hypertension medication or dosage increase between groups
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
proportion of patients achieving goal BP of <130/80 mm Hg between groups
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
proportion of patients that are prescribed an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor antagonist between groups
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

September 11, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 11, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2007

Last Verified

December 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe