Effects Of GW876008 On The Bowel In Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

August 7, 2017 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

A Phase IIa Pharmacodynamic Study of Antagonism of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Symptoms by GW876008, a Corticotrophin Releasing Factor 1 Receptor Antagonist (CRF1-RA)

The purpose of this study is to see if GW876008 in Irritable Bowel Syndrome patients will reverse stress-induced hypersensitivity, by looking at thresholds for perception and pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, NW1 2BU
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Must have irritable bowel syndrome.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Subjects who have been taking any medication for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome within 6 months prior to the start of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent change from Baseline in Laser Doppler regional Rectal Mucosal Blood Flow (RMBF) measured in response to physiological stress (cold water pressor test)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-dose) and Study Days 1, 2 and 3
Laser Doppler flowmetry measures changes in red cell flux using a probe that scans a fixed volume of tissue. Participants were examined in the left lateral position where DRT4 laser Doppler flow meter was placed against the rectal mucosa 10 centimeter (cm) above the lower limit of the anal margin, and pre-stress readings were taken after a period of 10 minutes of acclimatization in a room with an ambient temperature of 22 degrees Celsius. Physiological stress was evoked using the cold water pressor test. Participants were asked to place their hand and forearm into a container of ice-cold water at 0-4degree Celsius and were persuaded to maintain that position for as long as possible during the stress period of 10 minutes. Readings were then taken during pre-stress and at 5-minute intervals during the stress and recovery periods. Baseline was defined as the pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value minus the post-randomization value.
Baseline (pre-dose) and Study Days 1, 2 and 3
Percent Change from Baseline in Laser Doppler regional RMBF measured in response to psychological stress (dichotomous listening test)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-dose) and Study Days 1, 2 and 3
Laser Doppler flowmetry measures changes in red cell flux using a probe that scans a fixed volume of tissue, an indirect measure of flow can be obtained. Participants were examined in the left lateral position with no prior bowel preparation. The laser Doppler probe (DRT4 laser Doppler flow meter) was then placed against the rectal mucosa 10 centimeter above the lower limit of the anal margin, and pre-stress readings were taken after a period of 10 minutes of acclimatization in a room with an ambient temperature of 22 degrees Celsius. The dichotomous listening test was used as a psychological stressor. At the onset of stress, folk music was played into one ear and rock music into the other ear for 10 minutes. Readings were then taken during pre-stress and at 5-minute intervals during the stress and recovery periods. Baseline was defined as the pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value minus the post-randomization value.
Baseline (pre-dose) and Study Days 1, 2 and 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE)
Time Frame: Up to Week 14
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, may jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury.
Up to Week 14
Number of participants with abnormal clinical chemistry data of clinical concern
Time Frame: Up to Week 14
The clinical chemistry parameters included albumin, calcium low, creatinine, glucose, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, and bicarbonate. The total number of participants with clinical chemistry data of clinical concern have been presented.
Up to Week 14
Number of participants with abnormal hematology data of clinical concern
Time Frame: Up to Week 14
The hematology parameters included white blood cell count, neutrophil count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count and lymphocytes. The total number of participants with hematology of clinical concern have been presented.
Up to Week 14
Participant perceived stress as assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Study Days 1, 2 and 3
The acute emotional response to stress during each study visit was assessed using a 10 cm description-anchored visual analogue scale, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0=no-stress and 10=Most stressed ever. Higher scores indicated significant stress. Participants were asked to mark this before onset of stress, after 10 minutes of stress and finally after 10 minutes of recovery. After the pre-stress recordings, the period of either physiological or psychological stress were commenced and continued for 10 minutes, followed by a period of recovery for a further 10 minutes.
Study Days 1, 2 and 3
Systemic autonomic nervous system response as assessed by systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (SBP)
Time Frame: Up to Week 14
As an indicator of change in systemic autonomic activity, blood pressure was measured pre-stress, after 10 minutes of stress and after 10 minutes of recovery using a Dinamap.
Up to Week 14
Systemic autonomic nervous system response as assessed by heart rate (HR).
Time Frame: Up to Week 14
As an indicator of change in systemic autonomic activity, HR was measured pre-stress, after 10 minutes of stress and after 10 minutes of recovery using a Dinamap.
Up to Week 14
Percent change from Baseline in participant reported threshold for pain as a measure to assess Visceral (rectal) electro sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-dose) and Study Days 1, 2 and 3
Visceral (rectal) sensitivity to pain was measured using previously validated techniques. In brief, a 1-cm bipolar electrode (21L10) mounted on a 14-gauge Foley catheter was placed initially into the anal canal before the period of acclimatization. The stimulation parameters were set at 0.5-millisecond pulse width and 10-Hertz frequency for rectal measurements. The current was then increased slowly and the participants were asked to report when they felt it was painful (pain). Rectal measurements were made 8 cm above the anal verge. Measurements were made pre-stress, after 10 minutes of stress, and then after 10 minutes of recovery. The catheter remained in situ throughout the study but was moved from anal to rectal sites for the 2 measurements. Baseline was defined as the pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value minus the post-randomization value.
Baseline (pre-dose) and Study Days 1, 2 and 3
Percent change from Baseline in participant reported threshold for perception of an electrical stimulus as a measure to assess Visceral (rectal) electro sensitivity
Time Frame: Study Days 1, 2 and 3
Visceral (rectal) sensitivity to perception was measured using previously validated techniques. In brief, a 1-cm bipolar electrode (21L10) mounted on a 14-gauge Foley catheter was placed initially into the anal canal before the period of acclimatization. The stimulation parameters were set at 0.5-millisecond pulse width and 10-Hertz frequency for rectal measurements. The current was then increased slowly and the participants will be asked to report when they were first aware of this (perception). Rectal measurements were made 8 centimeter above the anal verge. Measurements were made pre-stress, after 10 minutes of stress, and then after 10 minutes of recovery. The catheter remained in situ throughout the study but will be moved from anal to rectal sites for the 2 measurements. Baseline was defined as the pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value minus the post-randomization value.
Study Days 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline in RMBF at 90 minutes post-dose
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-dose) and Study Days 1, 2 and 3
RMBF was measured in response to both physiologic and psychological stress. Pre-stress readings were taken after 10 minutes of acclimatization. Readings were taken during pre-stress collections and at 5 minutes intervals during the stress and recovery period.Baseline was defined as the pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value minus the post-randomization value.
Baseline (pre-dose) and Study Days 1, 2 and 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 8, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

October 6, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Irritable Colon

Clinical Trials on GW876008

3
Subscribe