Citrate Anticoagulation vs. Heparin-Coated Dialyzers

November 2, 2006 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Heparin-Coated Polyacrylonitrile Membrane Versus Regional Citrate Anticoagulation: a Prospective Randomised Study of 2 Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients at Risk of Bleeding

Hemodialysis causes contact activation of the coagulation pathway (1). For this reason, unfractionated or low molecular weight heparins are administered in daily practice to prevent thrombosis of the dialyzer and blood circuit, but the dose commonly used causes systemic anticoagulation. This can cause serious complications in patients with high risk of bleeding. Regional and low-dose heparinization, use of prostacycline, regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), and high-flow-rate hemodialysis without anticoagulation have been shown to reduce bleeding complications. Each of these methods, however, is characterized by its own technical difficulties, limitations, or complications.

The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membranes (AN69ST) and regional citrate anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients at risk of bleeding

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

  1. Open label single centre prospective randomized trial including 33 patients aged over 18 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5 requiring intermittent hemodialysis at the University Hospital Leuven and at risk of bleeding. Exclusion criteria were: any haemostatic disorder favouring either bleeding or clotting, anti-vitamin K or heparin treatment, heparin induced thrombocytopenia and haemodynamic instability. Written informed consent before enrolment.
  2. Random allocation (by sealed enveloppe) to RCA with a calcium free dialysate (RCA-Ca0), RCA with a calcium containing dialysate (RCA-Ca1,5) or to anticoagulant-free hemodiaysis with a heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane (Nephral 300ST®).
  3. At the end of each dialysis session, arterial and venous drip chambers and the filter will be inspected for visible signs of coagulation. Corresponding to the standard care at our dialysis unit, a semi-quantitative score with a range from 0 (no signs of clotting) to 4 (complete occlusion) will be used for evaluation of the dialyzer. By definition, the drip chamber will be considered clotted when a thrombus was visible after the rinse back procedure. A fibrin ring against the wall of the drip chamber will be considered normal.
  4. Blood samples for assessment of prothrombin fragment F1+2 and d-dimers will be collected from the inlet blood catheter prior to hemodialysis initiation and during hemodialysis at T15, T120 and T238.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

33

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • University Hopsital Leuven

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged over 18 years
  • chronic kidney disease stage 5 requiring intermittent hemodialysis
  • at risk of bleeding
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any haemostatic disorder favouring either bleeding or clotting
  • anti-vitamin K or heparin treatment
  • heparin induced thrombocytopenia
  • haemodynamic instability

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by clotting score of dialyser
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by occurrence of major and minor clotting events
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by instantaneous blood clearances

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
anticoagulation efficay as evaluated by time course of coagulation parameters

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pieter Evenepoel, MD, PhD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2005

Study Completion

September 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

November 3, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 3, 2006

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2006

Last Verified

November 1, 2006

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • pe2006-01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe