Study of Acupuncture and Care Interventions for the Treatment of Breast Inflammation During Breastfeeding

November 30, 2006 updated by: Karlstad University

A RCT in Sweden of Acupuncture and Care Interventions for the Relief of Inflammatory Symptoms of the Breast During Lactation

The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that acupuncture treatment hastens recovery time from inflammatory symptoms of the breast during breastfeeding. 205 mothers with 210 cases of breast inflammation (commonly called "mastitis") during breastfeeding were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. There were two groups where acupuncture was used and one without acupuncture. The mothers symptoms were recorded at the onset of health care contact and daily until recovery. All care interventions given, including antibiotic therapy, were monitored. Women who participated were asked to leave a breast milk sample to test for bacterial growth. It was found that acupuncture did not shorten the women's contacts with health care services but did improve their symptoms on contact days 3 and 4. It was seen in this study that only 15 % of women were prescribed antibiotics which was a very low rate of prescription compared to USA, Canada, Australia, Turkey and New Zealand where up to 100% are given antibiotics. Seven women (3.3% of those in the study) developed a breast boil and this is a similar number to a study in Australia where many more were treated by antibiotics. This could mean that many women throughout the world are given antibiotics when in fact they may recover without them. This is an important finding in relation to the fight against antibiotic resistant bacteria.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objectives: to further compare acupuncture treatment and care interventions for the relief of inflammatory symptoms of the breast during lactation and to investigate the relationship between bacteria in the breast milk and clinical signs and symptoms.

Design: randomised, non-blinded, controlled trial of acupuncture and care interventions.

Setting: a midwife-led breast-feeding clinic in Sweden.

Participants: 205 mothers with 210 cases of inflammatory symptoms of the breast during lactation agreed to participate. The mothers were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups, two of which included acupuncture amongst the care interventions and one without acupuncture. All groups were given essential care. Protocols, which included scales for erythema, breast tension and pain, were maintained for each day of contact with the breast-feeding clinic. A Severity Index (SI) for each mother and each day was created by adding together the scores on the erythema, breast tension and pain scales. The range of the SI was 0 (least severe) to 19 (most severe).

Findings: There was no significant difference in numbers of mothers in the treatment groups with the lowest possible score for severity of symptoms on contact days 3, 4 or 5. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups for number of contact days needed until the mother felt well enough to discontinue contact with the breast-feeding clinic or for number of mothers prescribed antibiotics. There were significant differences in the mean SI scores on contact days 3 and 4 between the non-acupuncture group and the two acupuncture groups. Mothers with less favourable outcomes (≥ 6 contact days, n = 61) were, at first contact with the midwife more often given advice on correction of the baby's attachment to the breast. An obstetrician was called to examine 20 % of the mothers and antibiotic therapy was prescribed for 15 % of the study population. The presence of Group B streptococci in the breast milk was related to less favourable outcomes.

Key conclusions and implications for practice: If acupuncture treatment is acceptable to the mother, this, together with care interventions such as correction of breast-feeding position and babies' attachment to the breast might be a more expedient and less invasive choice of treatment than the use of oxytocin nasal spray. Midwives, nurses or medical practitioners with specialist competence in breast feeding should be the primary care providers for mothers with inflammatory symptoms of the breast during lactation. The use of antibiotics for inflammatory symptoms of the breast should be closely monitored in order to help the global community reduce resistance development among bacterial pathogens.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

210

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Skane
      • Helsingborg, Skane, Sweden, 25187
        • Dept Obstetrics & Gynecology, Helsingborg Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lactating mothers with symptoms of breast inflammation
  • Any mixture of increased breast tension, fever, breast erythema, lumps in the breast

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-Swedish speaking
  • Psychiatric illness
  • Hemorrhagic disease
  • Prosthetic heart valves
  • Skin infections
  • Hepatitis B
  • HIV positive.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Proportion of women with lowest possible scores for symptom severity on days 3,4 and 5 in the three groups
Comparison of the three groups for mean scores for symptom severity on days 3,4 and 5
Comparison of the three treatment groups for number of contact days with health care services until recovery
Proportion of mothers in the three groups with less favourable outcomes (6 or more contact days to recovery)
Comparison of the three groups for proportions of women prescribed antibiotics
Comparison of the three groups for proportions of mothers who developed breast abscess
Proportions of women in the three groups who experienced residual symptoms within 6 weeks which required renewed health care contact
Comparison of the three groups for care interventions used

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Amounts of bacteria in the breast milk and correlated to erythema, increased breast tension and pain at first contact
Type of bacteria in breast milk related to favourable outcomes (5 or less contact days) and less favorable outcomes (6 or more contact days)
Differences in care interventions used in relation to favourable/less favourable outcomes
Relationship between the occurrence of residual symptoms and the use of antibiotics

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Linda J Kvist, PhD, Karlstads University
  • Study Director: Bodil Wilde Larsson, PhD, Karlstad University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2002

Study Completion

March 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

November 29, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 4, 2006

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2006

Last Verified

November 1, 2006

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe