- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00420420
MK0249 for the Symptomatic Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (MK0249-011)
January 28, 2015 updated by: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK0249 for the Symptomatic Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease
The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy and safety of an investigational medication for improving symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease.
Subjects will receive either active medication or placebo for 28 days.
Tests of memory, concentration will be included.
Safety will be monitored using routine clinical and laboratory tests.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
144
Phase
- Phase 2
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or females
- Age at least 55 years or older
- Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease, with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) between 18 and 26, inclusive, Modified Hachinski Ischemic Scale (MHIS) score =/<4, Global CDR score of 1 or 2, and who have a reliable informant/caregiver to accompany patient to all clinic visits
- If using symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease treatments, patients must be on the medication for 3 months and on a STABLE DOSE for at least 2 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients cannot be living in a skilled nursing facility
- Patients cannot have poorly-controlled hypertension
- Patients cannot have the following conditions within 6 months of screening: significant cardiovascular disorders, active major depressive disorder, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), or clinically significant sleep disorder
- Various concomitant therapy restrictions
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: placebo
|
MK0249 two (2) 2.5 mg Pbo capsules qd for a 28 day treatment period
|
Experimental: MK0249
|
MK0249 two (2) 2.5 mg capsules quaque die (qd) for 28 day treatment period.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Week 4 Change From Baseline in Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB): Short CNTB Summary Score.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
|
The CNTB was used to evaluate cognitive function, as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the short CNTB summary score.
The short CNTB summary score was scored as the mean score across 5 modules: Word List Learning-Selective Reminding, Word List Learning-Delayed Recall, Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time, and Visual Memory subtests.
The short CNTB summary score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores (and positive changes from baseline) indicating better performance.
|
Baseline and Week 4
|
Week 4 Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog): ADAS-Cog Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
|
The ADAS-Cog, scored as the total score of 11 tasks including mazes was used to evaluate cognitive function, as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the ADAS-Cog total score.
The ADAS-Cog total score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher total scores indicating more impairment.
Lower scores (and negative changes from Baseline) indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and Week 4
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Week 4 Change From Baseline in Cognition Summary Score (CSS)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
|
The CSS was used to evaluate cognitive function as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the CSS total score.
The CSS was derived from the correct sequence percentage from the Route Test and 6 of the CNTB scores (the CSS was scored as the mean of the 7 scores).
CSS scores can range from 0 to 100, higher scores (and positive changes from baseline) indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and Week 4
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Baseline: Short CNTB Summary Score.
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The CNTB was used to evaluate cognitive function, as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the short CNTB summary score.
The short CNTB summary score was scored as the mean score across 5 modules: Word List Learning-Selective Reminding, Word List Learning-Delayed Recall, Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time, and Visual Memory subtests.
The short CNTB summary score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores (and positive changes from baseline) indicating better performance.
|
Baseline
|
Baseline: ADAS-Cog Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The ADAS-Cog, scored as the total score of 11 tasks including mazes was used to evaluate cognitive function, as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the ADAS-Cog total score.
The ADAS-Cog total score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher total scores indicating more impairment.
Lower scores (and negative changes from Baseline) indicate better performance.
|
Baseline
|
Baseline: Cognition Summary Score (CSS)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The CSS was used to evaluate cognitive function as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the CSS total score.
The CSS was derived from the correct sequence percentage from the Route Test and 6 of the CNTB scores (the CSS was scored as the mean of the 7 scores).
CSS scores can range from 0 to 100, higher scores (and positive changes from baseline) indicate better performance.
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2008
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2007
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 10, 2007
First Posted (Estimate)
January 11, 2007
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
February 12, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 28, 2015
Last Verified
January 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0249-011
- 2006_534
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease
-
University of Southern CaliforniaAlzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute; American Heart Association; Schaeffer...RecruitingDementia | Alzheimer Disease | Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease | Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Institute on Aging (NIA); Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute; Brigham and Women's Hospital and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingDementia | Alzheimer Disease | Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease | Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseUnited States
-
Novoic LimitedRecruitingAlzheimer Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease | Alzheimer's Disease (Incl Subtypes) | Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseUnited States
-
Novoic LimitedRecruitingAlzheimer Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease | Alzheimer's Disease (Incl Subtypes) | Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
Novoic LimitedCompletedAlzheimer Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease | Alzheimer's Disease (Incl Subtypes) | Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseUnited States
-
Novoic LimitedRecruitingAlzheimer Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease | Alzheimer's Disease (Incl Subtypes) | Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
Novoic LimitedCompletedAlzheimer Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease | Alzheimer's Disease (Incl Subtypes) | Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
University Hospital, BordeauxMinistry for Health and Solidarity, FranceCompletedAlzheimer's Disease (AD) | Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Related DisordersFrance
-
Novoic LimitedRecruitingAlzheimer Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease | Alzheimer's Disease (Incl Subtypes) | Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease | Normal CognitionUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Active, not recruitingSuspected Typical Alzheimer's Disease (AD) | Suspected Atypical Alzheimer's Disease (AD)United States
Clinical Trials on MK0249
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedParanoid Schizophrenia
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCTerminatedSleep Apnea, Obstructive | Hypopnea Syndrome | Excessive Daytime Sleepiness
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)