MK0249 for the Symptomatic Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (MK0249-011)

January 28, 2015 updated by: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK0249 for the Symptomatic Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy and safety of an investigational medication for improving symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease. Subjects will receive either active medication or placebo for 28 days. Tests of memory, concentration will be included. Safety will be monitored using routine clinical and laboratory tests.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or females
  • Age at least 55 years or older
  • Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease, with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) between 18 and 26, inclusive, Modified Hachinski Ischemic Scale (MHIS) score =/<4, Global CDR score of 1 or 2, and who have a reliable informant/caregiver to accompany patient to all clinic visits
  • If using symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease treatments, patients must be on the medication for 3 months and on a STABLE DOSE for at least 2 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients cannot be living in a skilled nursing facility
  • Patients cannot have poorly-controlled hypertension
  • Patients cannot have the following conditions within 6 months of screening: significant cardiovascular disorders, active major depressive disorder, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), or clinically significant sleep disorder
  • Various concomitant therapy restrictions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: placebo
MK0249 two (2) 2.5 mg Pbo capsules qd for a 28 day treatment period
Experimental: MK0249
MK0249 two (2) 2.5 mg capsules quaque die (qd) for 28 day treatment period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Week 4 Change From Baseline in Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB): Short CNTB Summary Score.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
The CNTB was used to evaluate cognitive function, as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the short CNTB summary score. The short CNTB summary score was scored as the mean score across 5 modules: Word List Learning-Selective Reminding, Word List Learning-Delayed Recall, Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time, and Visual Memory subtests. The short CNTB summary score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores (and positive changes from baseline) indicating better performance.
Baseline and Week 4
Week 4 Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog): ADAS-Cog Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
The ADAS-Cog, scored as the total score of 11 tasks including mazes was used to evaluate cognitive function, as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the ADAS-Cog total score. The ADAS-Cog total score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher total scores indicating more impairment. Lower scores (and negative changes from Baseline) indicate better performance.
Baseline and Week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Week 4 Change From Baseline in Cognition Summary Score (CSS)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
The CSS was used to evaluate cognitive function as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the CSS total score. The CSS was derived from the correct sequence percentage from the Route Test and 6 of the CNTB scores (the CSS was scored as the mean of the 7 scores). CSS scores can range from 0 to 100, higher scores (and positive changes from baseline) indicate better performance.
Baseline and Week 4

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline: Short CNTB Summary Score.
Time Frame: Baseline
The CNTB was used to evaluate cognitive function, as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the short CNTB summary score. The short CNTB summary score was scored as the mean score across 5 modules: Word List Learning-Selective Reminding, Word List Learning-Delayed Recall, Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time, and Visual Memory subtests. The short CNTB summary score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores (and positive changes from baseline) indicating better performance.
Baseline
Baseline: ADAS-Cog Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline
The ADAS-Cog, scored as the total score of 11 tasks including mazes was used to evaluate cognitive function, as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the ADAS-Cog total score. The ADAS-Cog total score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher total scores indicating more impairment. Lower scores (and negative changes from Baseline) indicate better performance.
Baseline
Baseline: Cognition Summary Score (CSS)
Time Frame: Baseline
The CSS was used to evaluate cognitive function as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the CSS total score. The CSS was derived from the correct sequence percentage from the Route Test and 6 of the CNTB scores (the CSS was scored as the mean of the 7 scores). CSS scores can range from 0 to 100, higher scores (and positive changes from baseline) indicate better performance.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 12, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2015

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on MK0249

3
Subscribe