Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

MK0249 for the Symptomatic Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (MK0249-011)

28 januari 2015 uppdaterad av: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK0249 for the Symptomatic Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy and safety of an investigational medication for improving symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease. Subjects will receive either active medication or placebo for 28 days. Tests of memory, concentration will be included. Safety will be monitored using routine clinical and laboratory tests.

Studieöversikt

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

144

Fas

  • Fas 2

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

55 år och äldre (Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or females
  • Age at least 55 years or older
  • Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease, with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) between 18 and 26, inclusive, Modified Hachinski Ischemic Scale (MHIS) score =/<4, Global CDR score of 1 or 2, and who have a reliable informant/caregiver to accompany patient to all clinic visits
  • If using symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease treatments, patients must be on the medication for 3 months and on a STABLE DOSE for at least 2 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients cannot be living in a skilled nursing facility
  • Patients cannot have poorly-controlled hypertension
  • Patients cannot have the following conditions within 6 months of screening: significant cardiovascular disorders, active major depressive disorder, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), or clinically significant sleep disorder
  • Various concomitant therapy restrictions

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Behandling
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Dubbel

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Placebo-jämförare: placebo
MK0249 two (2) 2.5 mg Pbo capsules qd for a 28 day treatment period
Experimentell: MK0249
MK0249 two (2) 2.5 mg capsules quaque die (qd) for 28 day treatment period.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Week 4 Change From Baseline in Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB): Short CNTB Summary Score.
Tidsram: Baseline and Week 4
The CNTB was used to evaluate cognitive function, as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the short CNTB summary score. The short CNTB summary score was scored as the mean score across 5 modules: Word List Learning-Selective Reminding, Word List Learning-Delayed Recall, Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time, and Visual Memory subtests. The short CNTB summary score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores (and positive changes from baseline) indicating better performance.
Baseline and Week 4
Week 4 Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog): ADAS-Cog Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline and Week 4
The ADAS-Cog, scored as the total score of 11 tasks including mazes was used to evaluate cognitive function, as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the ADAS-Cog total score. The ADAS-Cog total score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher total scores indicating more impairment. Lower scores (and negative changes from Baseline) indicate better performance.
Baseline and Week 4

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Week 4 Change From Baseline in Cognition Summary Score (CSS)
Tidsram: Baseline and Week 4
The CSS was used to evaluate cognitive function as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the CSS total score. The CSS was derived from the correct sequence percentage from the Route Test and 6 of the CNTB scores (the CSS was scored as the mean of the 7 scores). CSS scores can range from 0 to 100, higher scores (and positive changes from baseline) indicate better performance.
Baseline and Week 4

Andra resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Baseline: Short CNTB Summary Score.
Tidsram: Baseline
The CNTB was used to evaluate cognitive function, as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the short CNTB summary score. The short CNTB summary score was scored as the mean score across 5 modules: Word List Learning-Selective Reminding, Word List Learning-Delayed Recall, Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time, and Visual Memory subtests. The short CNTB summary score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores (and positive changes from baseline) indicating better performance.
Baseline
Baseline: ADAS-Cog Total Score
Tidsram: Baseline
The ADAS-Cog, scored as the total score of 11 tasks including mazes was used to evaluate cognitive function, as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the ADAS-Cog total score. The ADAS-Cog total score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher total scores indicating more impairment. Lower scores (and negative changes from Baseline) indicate better performance.
Baseline
Baseline: Cognition Summary Score (CSS)
Tidsram: Baseline
The CSS was used to evaluate cognitive function as measured by the mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the CSS total score. The CSS was derived from the correct sequence percentage from the Route Test and 6 of the CNTB scores (the CSS was scored as the mean of the 7 scores). CSS scores can range from 0 to 100, higher scores (and positive changes from baseline) indicate better performance.
Baseline

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Publikationer och användbara länkar

Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart

1 november 2006

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

1 augusti 2008

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

1 augusti 2008

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

9 januari 2007

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

10 januari 2007

Första postat (Uppskatta)

11 januari 2007

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Uppskatta)

12 februari 2015

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

28 januari 2015

Senast verifierad

1 januari 2015

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Kliniska prövningar på MK0249

3
Prenumerera