Amyloid Prediction in Early Stage Alzheimer's Disease Through Speech Phenotyping - FUTURE Extension (FUTURE-US)

June 12, 2024 updated by: Novoic Limited

A Study to Evaluate the Ability of Speech- and Language-based Digital Biomarkers to Detect and Characterise Prodromal and Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease in a Clinical Setting - AMYPRED-US FUTURE Extension Study.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether a set of algorithms analysing acoustic and linguistic patterns of speech, can predict change in Preclinical Alzheimer's Clinical Composite with semantic processing (PACC5) between baseline and +12 month follow up across all four Arms, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA) between the change in PACC5 and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data to predict it. Secondary objectives include (1) evaluating whether similar algorithms can predict change in PACC5 between baseline and +12 month follow up in the cognitively normal (CN) and MCI populations separately; (2) evaluating whether similar algorithms trained to regress against PACC5 scores at baseline, still regress significantly against PACC5 scores at +12 month follow-up, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA) between the PACC5 composite at +12 months and the regression model, trained on baseline speech data to predict PACC5 scores at baseline; (3) evaluating whether similar algorithms can classify converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal Arms (Arm 3 + 4), and fast vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arm 1 + 2), as measured by the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity and Cohen's kappa of the corresponding binary classifiers. Secondary objectives include the objectives above, but using time points of +24 months and +36 months; and finally to evaluate whether the model performance for the objectives and outcomes above improved if the model has access to speech data at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 month timepoints.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Santa Ana, California, United States, 92705
        • Syrentis Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be identified from participants of the AMYPRED-US study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects are fully eligible for and have completed the AMYPRED-US (Amyloid Prediction in early stage Alzheimer's disease from acoustic and linguistic patterns of speech) study.

(See https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04928976)

- Subject consents to take part in FUTURE extension study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject hasn't completed the full visit day in the AMYPRED-US study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Arm 2: MCI amyloid negative
  • Non-AD Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
  • Negative amyloid PET or amyloid CSF status.
  • MMSE 23-30 (inclusive)
Arm 3: CN amyloid positive
  • Absence of a diagnosis of cognitive disorder and/or subjectively reported cognitive decline
  • Positive amyloid PET or amyloid CSF status.
  • MMSE 26-30 (inclusive)
Arm 4: CN amyloid negative
  • Absence of a diagnosis of cognitive disorder and/or subjectively reported cognitive decline
  • Negative amyloid PET or amyloid CSF status.
  • MMSE 26-30 (inclusive)
Arm 1: MCI amyloid positive
  • Meet the National Institute of Aging - Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) core clinical criteria (2011) for MCI due to Alzheimer's
  • Positive amyloid PET or amyloid CSF status.
  • MMSE 23-30 (inclusive)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The agreement between the change in the PACC5 composite between baseline and +12 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting in all four Arms, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The agreement between the change in the PACC5 composite between baseline and +24 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting in all four Arms, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The agreement between the change in the PACC5 composite between baseline and +36 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting in all four Arms, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
The agreement between the change in the PACC5 composite between baseline and +12 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, to predict it in the CN Arms (Arms 3 and 4), as measured by the CIA.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The agreement between the change in the PACC5 composite between baseline and +24 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, to predict it in the CN Arms (Arms 3 and 4), as measured by the CIA.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The agreement between the change in the PACC5 composite between baseline and +36 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting it in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2), as measured by the CIA.
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
The agreement between the PACC5 composite at +12 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting in all four Arms based on +12 month speech data, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The agreement between the PACC5 composite at +24 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting in all four Arms based on +12 month speech data, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The agreement between the PACC5 composite at +36 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting in all four Arms based on +12 month speech data, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
The agreement between the PACC5 composite and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data and +12 month speech data, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The agreement between the PACC5 composite and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data and +24 month speech data, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The agreement between the PACC5 composite and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data and +36 month speech data, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +12 months.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +24 months.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +36 months.
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +12 months.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +24 months.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +36 months.
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +12 months.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +24 months.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +36 months.
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +12 months.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +24 months.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +36 months.
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +12 months.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +24 months.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +36 months.
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +12 months.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +24 months.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +36 months.
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +12 months.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +24 months.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +36 months.
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +12 months.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +24 months.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +36 months.
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emil Fristed, MSc, Novoic Ltd

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 21, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Subscribe