Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia: Pharmacoeconomics

February 26, 2009 updated by: Brigham and Women's Hospital

Study to Compare the Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia Rates Associated With Heparin and Low Molecular Weight Heparin Usage as Well as Evaluate the Economic and Long-Term Clinical Burden of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia.

Patients at BWH receiving unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin who subsequently develop heparin induced thrombocytopenia will be identified via a computer generated report designed for the purposes of this study.

Subsequently, we will compare the heparin induced thrombocytopenia rates associated with heparin and low molecular weight heparin usage as well as evaluate the economic and long-term clinical burden of heparin induced thrombocytopenia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The goal of this research is to investigate the outcomes and pharmacoeconomics of patients diagnosed with heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).

Background:

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a complication of heparin therapy receiving wide-scale awareness, increasing detection, and concern. Data from controlled studies demonstrate a lower incidence of HIT with low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) when compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) However, registry data comparing the incidence of HIT in patients receiving LWMH vs. UFH are scarce. We will define the incidence of HIT in patients receiving LWMH vs. UFH in the "real world" setting at Brigham and Women's Hospital. We will evaluate the associated clinical and economic implications.

Our Objectives are:

  1. Compare the HIT rates associated with heparin and LMWH usage:

    The incidence of HIT will be assessed for initial the type of heparin exposure responsible for causing HIT. Patients will be categorized as receiving UFH with or without LMWH or as receiving only LMWH.

  2. Evaluate the economic burden of HIT to hospitals and/or payors:

    We will capture all expenses associated with each patient admission. Hospital expenses will be tabulated daily using the hospital database and the proprietary cost accounting system, Transition Systems, Inc (TSI).

    Expenses will be categorized by procedure or area of care and will include Emergency Department care, operating room use, hospital room and board, hospital based physician fees, nursing labor, dialysis, clinical laboratory studies (hematology, microbiology, cytology, urinalysis), radiology (magnetic resonance imaging, computer axial tomography, and ultrasound imaging), ancillary services (support nutrition support, occupational, respiratory, and physical therapy services), medications, diagnostic procedures (cardiac catheterization, electrophysiologic testing, endoscopy, vascular ultrasound, pathology), and diagnostic testing (electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram, and electromyography).

    We will compare the mean total hospitalization costs of UFH induced HIT to those associated with LMWH induced HIT. Where possible we will compare individual resources used within the two groups.

  3. Evaluate the long-term clinical burden and recurrence of HIT:

All patients diagnosed with HIT during the study period will be evaluated for a documented prior diagnosis of HIT. Additionally, all patients will be monitored for 12 months following initial diagnosis of HIT for subsequent diagnosis of HIT. The long-term clinical burden of HIT will be assessed by tracking the rates of in-hospital and subsequent mortality.

Patient Identification:

Brigham and Women's Hospital has a sophisticated computerized system that integrates medical, laboratory, and pharmacy data. Patients receiving UFH or enoxaparin who subsequently develop HIT will be identified via a computer generated report designed for the purposes of this study.

All patients with a diagnosis of HIT during the study period (January 2004 - December 2005) will be included in the evaluation. Criteria for a HIT positive diagnosis include: a clinical suspicion of HIT, a decrease in platelets to <150,000 or 50% from baseline, and serologic confirmation defined as a positive PF4 ELISA test. Patients will be monitored for clinical symptoms of HIT (new thrombosis, thrombocytopenia). Patients will be followed for clinical outcomes and incurred expenses over the hospitalization period and subsequent outpatient follow up.

Data Collection:

A protocol specific database will be created on an Access platform to house all collected data. Data will be analyzed internally by the Venous Thromboembolism Research Group.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients hospitalized at BWH who have a PF4-Positive antibody test

Description

All patients hospitalized at BWH who have a PF4-Positive antibody test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clotting and Bleeding Complications
Time Frame: 90 Days
90 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 30 Days
30 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Samuel Z. Goldhaber, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

April 4, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 2, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2009

Last Verified

February 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe