Superficial, Cervical Block in Thyroid Surgery, a Randomized Controlled Trial

July 27, 2016 updated by: Thomas Steffen, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen

Impact and Cost Efficiency of Bilateral, Superficial Cervical Block in Thyroid Surgery Under General Anesthesia

The study investigates the impact on post-operative pain of the superficial cervical block with bupivacaine combined with subcutaneous infiltration of the incisional area in thyroid surgery under general anesthesia. In addition, cost savings using the cervical block are evaluated (due to reduced length of hospital stay).

The study is prospective, randomized, double blind, and placebo-controlled. The study is performed at the Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

183

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • St. Gallen, Switzerland, 9007
        • Department of surgery, Cantonal hospital of St. Gallen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective thyroid or combined thyroid/parathyroid surgery, restricted to the central cervical compartment
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intolerance to used medication
  • Recurrent disease
  • Neck dissection, sternotomy
  • Emergency surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: cervical block before surgery
bilateral superficial cervical block, placed before surgery (just before skin incision)
10 ml of 5% bupivacaine (Carbostesin®) was used for each side. Along the cranial dorsal edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, three deposits of approximately 2.5 ml were injected to anaesthetize the cervical plexus with its nervus transversus colli. To anaesthetize the region of the planned skin incision, the remaining 2·5 ml was injected subcutaneously on each side.
Placebo Comparator: placebo cervical block before surgery
placebo bilateral superficial cervical block with saline, placed before surgery (just before skin incision)

10 ml of saline (the carrier of bupivacaine in the experimental treatment) was used for each side.

Along the cranial dorsal edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, three deposits of approximately 2.5 ml were injected to anaesthetize the cervical plexus with its nervus transversus colli. To anaesthetize the region of the planned skin incision, the remaining 2·5 ml was injected subcutaneously on each side.

Experimental: cervical block after surgery
bilateral superficial cervical block, placed after surgery (just after skin closure)
10 ml of 5% bupivacaine (Carbostesin®) was used for each side. Along the cranial dorsal edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, three deposits of approximately 2.5 ml were injected to anaesthetize the cervical plexus with its nervus transversus colli. To anaesthetize the region of the planned skin incision, the remaining 2·5 ml was injected subcutaneously on each side.
Placebo Comparator: placebo cervical block after surgery
placebo bilateral superficial cervical block with saline, placed after surgery (just after skin closure)

10 ml of saline (the carrier of bupivacaine in the experimental treatment) was used for each side.

Along the cranial dorsal edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, three deposits of approximately 2.5 ml were injected to anaesthetize the cervical plexus with its nervus transversus colli. To anaesthetize the region of the planned skin incision, the remaining 2·5 ml was injected subcutaneously on each side.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
Patient administered Instrument to indicate pain on a level from 0 to 10. (0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain)
6 hours after surgery
Pooled Relative Treatment Effect of VAS
Time Frame: 4 days after surgery

Pain was obtained using the visual analog scale (VAS) three times daily for the 4 postoperative days (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)

The pooled relative treatment effect is the probability of values being higher in one group than in another group (ranging from 0 to 1)

4 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Patient administered Instrument to indicate pain on a level from 0 to 10. (0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain)
24 hours after surgery
Consumption of Post-operative Analgetics
Time Frame: 5 days after surgery
number of participants taking post-operative analgetics
5 days after surgery
Mean Consumption of Post-operative Analgetics
Time Frame: 5 days after surgery
mean pooled dose of post-operative analgetics
5 days after surgery
Hospital Stay
Time Frame: 90 days
time from surgery to Hospital release in days
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Clerici, MD, Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

May 11, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EKSG 06/010/1B
  • 2006DR4184 (Other Identifier: SwissMedic)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thyroidectomy

Clinical Trials on bilateral superficial cervical block

3
Subscribe