Polyphenol Bioavailability From Chocolate

March 27, 2013 updated by: Nestlé

Comparison of the Bioavailability of Polyphenols From Milk and Dark Chocolate

Dark chocolate is one of the richest sources of polyphenols though it has been hypothesised that the bioavailability of epicatechin from milk chocolate was reduced compared to dark. The primary outcome measure is to compare plasma polyphenol levels after consumption of 3 chocolates (2 milk, 1 dark) while the secondary outcome measures are to characterise the time course of polyphenols in the blood and to investigate individual variation in Tmax and Cmax for use in future studies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dark chocolate is one of the richest sources of polyphenols, for example, a standard 40g portion of dark chocolate contains 400-800 mg of polyphenols, compared to red wine (170 mg /100ml) or an apple (200 mg/piece). Cocoa polyphenols, most notably the catechins, can exist in both lipid and water-based environments (amphipathic), meaning they can spare both lipophillic and hydrophilic vitamins. There have been a number of human trials conducted using chocolate or cocoa and measuring various endpoints. Most have been conducted with dark chocolate. An article in Nature found that the bioavailability of epicatechin from milk chocolate was substantially reduced compared to dark, and even dark taken with a glass of milk (Serafini et al 2003). The hypothesis was that the milk proteins bind to polyphenols, making them unavailable. Subsequent studies have not been able to reproduce this, but none have been conducted using solid chocolate as the first study, all have been done using a drink matrix, which may completely alter the binding interactions of the polyphenols and protein. Previous bioavailability trials with dark chocolate have shown a 12 fold increase in plasma epicatechin 2 hours after consumption of 80g of chocolate containing 557 mg total polyphenols (137 mg epicatechin) (Rein et al 2000) with a concurrent increase in plasma total antioxidant capacity and a decrease in TBARS. Another study showed an increase in epicatechin 2 hours after administering 25g of chocolate chips containing 220 mg flavanols and procyanidins, with a concurrent increase in prostacyclin/leukotriene ratio and reduction in platelet-related hemostasis (Holt et al 2002).

This study is designed as a blinded, three arm crossover trial. The primary outcome measure is to compare plasma polyphenol levels after consumption of 3 chocolates (2 milk, 1 dark) while the secondary outcome measures are to characterise the time course of polyphenols in the blood and to investigate individual variation in Tmax and Cmax for use in future studies. All volunteers will try all chocolate types with a similar taste & appearance (though milk and dark are likely to still be distinguishable for the volunteer, not the investigator). Subjects will undergo medical screening, anthropometry, physical activity and dietary assessments before randomisation for the order of consumption. Bloods are to be taken as a time course for the next 24 hours, as is urine.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1000
        • Nestlé Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 19 - 45 years, male and female
  • Healthy as determined by the medical questionnaire
  • Normal weight: BMI 19 - 25
  • Having given informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intestinal or metabolic diseases/disorders such as diabetic, renal, hepatic, hypertension, pancreatic or ulcer, including lacto-intolerance.
  • Have had a major gastrointestinal surgery.
  • Have a regular consumption of medication.
  • Have an exceptionally high intake of chocolate or similarly high polyphenol foods.
  • Have a high and regular intake of vitamin supplements
  • Have an alcohol intake: > 2 units a day
  • Patient who cannot be expected to comply with treatment.
  • Smoker
  • Having a nut allergy
  • Unwilling to consume chocolate
  • Currently participating or having participated in another clinical trial during the last 3 weeks.
  • Having given blood in the past three weeks
  • More than 3 x 45 min of exercise per week

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1
Dark chocolate
dark chocolate
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 2
Milk chocolate 1
Milk chocolate 1
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 3
Milk chocolate 2
Milk chocolate 2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
AUC plasma polyphenols
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Tmax and Cmax of plasma polyphenols
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours
Plasma and urinary metabolite identification and quantification
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen A Cooper, PhD, Nestle
  • Study Director: Gary Williamson, PhD, Nestle

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 27, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 29, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2013

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 06.31.MET

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe