Data Analysis of a Managed Care Weight Reduction Trial

January 7, 2020 updated by: Judith Wylie-Rosett, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
This study will involve secondary data analysis for a study done by Wylie-Rosett et al. in 2001 that evaluated the costs and effects of incremental components of a weight-loss program. Data analysis will involve cross-sectional and predictive analyses and may include: regression analyses to determine predictors of weight loss and cardiovascular risk, correlations between weight reduction strategies and biological indices, and interactions between biomarkers of inflammation and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. This data will also be available for economic modeling.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will involve secondary data analysis for a study done by Wylie-Rosett et al. in 2001. Using a 3-arm, 12-month randomized clinical trial, Wylie-Rosett et al. evaluated the costs and effects of incremental components of a weight-loss program. The study included 588 individuals (BMI> 25 kg/m2) in a freestanding health maintenance organization and achieved an 81% completion rate. The intervention used a cognitive behavioral approach for tailoring lifestyle modification goals. The incremental levels of interventions included a) a workbook alone, b) the addition of computerized tailoring using onsite computer kiosks with touch screen monitors, and c) the addition of both computers and staff consultations. For the increasing levels of intervention intensity, the mean 12-month weight losses were 2.2, 4.7, and 7.4 pounds, with the respective cost per participant being $12.33, $41.99, and $133.74. The decreases in mean BMIs for these respective intervention levels were 0.4, 0.9, and 1.2. All groups reported a decrease in energy and fat intake and an increase in blocks walked (p<.01). Intervention variables that correlated with weight loss included more computer logons, achieving computer-selected goals, more self-monitoring, increased walking, and decreased energy and fat intake, as well as higher attendance in staff consultation group sessions for that treatment condition. Weight loss correlated with decreases in fasting glucose and blood pressure. Wylie-Rosett et al. (2001) concluded that, in a weight-loss program, computers can facilitate selecting behavioral change goals. More frequent usage resulted in greater weight loss, and staff counseling to augment the computer intervention achieved the most weight loss. The purpose of this study will be secondary analysis of the data collected in the original MODELS study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

588

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants were recruited from an HMO's patient population and from New Hyde Park, NY.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI of more than 25 (or a BMI of 24 or more plus 1 cardiovascular risk factor), and the willingness to follow the study protocol, which included a refundable $100 deposit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intention to move beyond commuting distance in the next 12 months,
  • Medical conditions that would interfere with study participation,
  • Unwillingness to follow the study protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
1
a workbook alone
The workbook developed as a do-it-yourself program in which participants completed self-help sheets that guided them to sections of the workbook most salient to their needs.
2
a workbook alone and the addition of computerized tailoring using onsite computer kiosks with touch screen monitors
The workbook developed as a do-it-yourself program in which participants completed self-help sheets that guided them to sections of the workbook most salient to their needs.
The computer intervention was provided using a network system that included a file server plus 5 multimedia computers with touch screens. The expert software program was written to guide participants in using the workbook and tail behavioral goals based on their prior computer use and the answers they provided on baseline questionnaires. The three primary paths in the computer addressed nutrition, fitness, and psychobehavioral content.
3
a workbook, the addition of computerized tailoring using onsite computer kiosks with touch screen monitors, and staff consultations.
The workbook developed as a do-it-yourself program in which participants completed self-help sheets that guided them to sections of the workbook most salient to their needs.
The computer intervention was provided using a network system that included a file server plus 5 multimedia computers with touch screens. The expert software program was written to guide participants in using the workbook and tail behavioral goals based on their prior computer use and the answers they provided on baseline questionnaires. The three primary paths in the computer addressed nutrition, fitness, and psychobehavioral content.
The staff consultation component included 6 closed-group workshop sessions and up to 18 telephone or face-to-face consultations with a registered dietician and/or a cognitive behavioral therapist. The workshop curriculum focused on specific activities and assignments in the workbook, and it encouraged use of the computer to identify problems and issues.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
weight loss
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
diabetes and cardiovascular risk
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Judith Wylie-Rosett, EdD, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • Study Chair: Charles Swencionis, PhD, Yeshiva University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

May 7, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2008-833

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe