A Study Of The Efficacy Of Gabapentin In Neuropathic Pain Patients As Measured By Quantitative Sensory Testing

A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study To Assess The Reproducibility And The Effect Of Gabapentin On Quantitative Sensory Testing In Neuropathic Pain Patients

The purpose of this study is to assess the reproducibility and the effect of gabapentin on quantitative sensory testing assessments in neuropathic pain subjects.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Liverpool, United Kingdom, L9 7AL
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Neuropathic pain of peripheral origin as a consequence of either post-herpetic neuralgia or post-traumatic neuropathic pain
  • Well-defined skin area of mechanical allodynia to punctate (von Frey filament) stimuli
  • Pain intensity score of ≥ 4/10 for von Frey filament-evoked allodynia at the skin area

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have undergone neurolytic or neurosurgical therapy, including skin excisions, for neuropathic pain
  • Patients who have trigeminal neuralgia, central pain, chronic radiculopathy, or peripheral neuropathy of non-mechanical or unknown origin
  • Patients with any other co-existing pain which cannot be differentiated from the neuropathic pain of peripheral origin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sequence 2
Placebo for 1 week followed by gabapentin 300 mg oral capsule once daily titrated over 1 week to gabapentin 600 mg three times daily for 2 weeks
Placebo Comparator: Sequence 1
Placebo for 2 weeks followed by gabapentin 300 mg oral capsule once daily titrated over 1 week to gabapentin 600 mg three times daily for 1 week

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Presence/intensity of punctate allodynia (von Frey filament), measured on the pain numeric rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Subject assessed quality of evoked pain for punctate allodynia
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4
Pain NRS score for temporal summation to dynamic brush allodynia (soft and coarse brush)
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4
Pressure pain tolerance threshold
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4
Pain NRS scores for pressure pain
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4
Subject assessed quality of evoked pain for temporal summation to dynamic brush allodynia (soft and coarse brush)
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4
Tactile threshold
Time Frame: Week 4
Week 4
Pressure pain detection threshold
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4
Area of punctate and dynamic (soft and coarse brush) allodynia
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4
Pain NRS score for punctate allodynia
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4
Pain NRS scores for temporal summation to punctate stimuli
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4
Subject assessed quality of evoked pain for temporal summation to punctate stimuli
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4
Neuropathic pain scale
Time Frame: Week 4
Week 4
Test-day global pain scale
Time Frame: Week 4
Week 4
Pain diary card
Time Frame: Week 4
Week 4
Pain NRS score for dynamic brush allodynia (soft brush)
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4
Subject assessed quality of evoked pain for dynamic brush allodynia (soft brush)
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4
Presence of metabonomic biomarkers
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 4
Weeks 1 and 4
Physical examination
Time Frame: 1 week after 4-week treatment period
1 week after 4-week treatment period
Adverse events
Time Frame: Throughout study duration
Throughout study duration
Clinical laboratory tests
Time Frame: 1 week after 4-week treatment period
1 week after 4-week treatment period
Subject assessed quality of pressure pain
Time Frame: Weeks 2 and 4
Weeks 2 and 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

May 8, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe