A Study of the Performance of Certain Prevail Implants Used in Short Fixed Cases (RadioCity)

March 24, 2022 updated by: ZimVie

A Prospective, Randomized-controlled Multicenter Study of the Osseotite Certain Lateralized Implanting Short-span Fixed Bridge Cases for Preservation of Crestal Bone

This prospective, randomized study evaluates the performance and crestal bone changes difference between the Osseotite Certain Prevail vs the non-lateralized design of the implant.

Study (null) hypothesis: the crestal bone changes that take place after placement and loading of the Osseotite lateralized implants will be the same as for similar but non-lateralized Osseotite Certain implants.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized-controlled study where patients with qualifying partial edentulism received a short fixed bridge restoration. Each implant site was randomized to receive either the test (Osseotite Certain Prevail) or the control non lateralized version of the Osseotite Certain implant. All implants were placed in a single-stage manner with temporary provisionalization taking place two months after implant placement. Enrollment continued until 10 patients (approximately 30 implants) were treated at each participating study center.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, D-10117
        • Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients of either sex and any race greater than 18 years of age
  • patients for whom a decision has already been made to use dental implants for treating an existing dental condition specifically: a partially edentulous short fixed case of less than 4 implants in the maxilla or mandible; no cantilevers are allowed, but one interior crown may be a pontic
  • patients must be physically able to tolerate conventional surgical and restorative procedures
  • patients must agree to be evaluated for each study visit, especially the yearly follow-up visit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with active infection or severe inflammation in the areas intended for the implants
  • patients with more than 10 cigarette per day smoking habit
  • patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • patients with metabolic bone disease
  • patients who have had treatment with therapeutic radiation to the head within the past 12 months
  • patients in need of allogenic bone grafting at the site of the intended study implant
  • patients who are pregnant at the screening visit
  • patients with evidence of severe para-functional habits such as bruxing or clenching
  • patients with cantilevers and more than one pontic per bridge

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Osseotite Certain Prevail
Dental implant with lateralized design
Root form titanium dental implant
Other Names:
  • Osseotite
  • Prevail
  • Certain
Placebo Comparator: Osseotite Certain
Dental implant without the lateralized design
Dental implant without the lateralized design
Other Names:
  • Osseotite
  • Certain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Crestal Bone Regression (Amount of Bone Measured) Around Each Implant Unit
Time Frame: 1 year
Millimeters of crestal bone observed and measured in a radiograph of each study implant is measured and averaged to obtain the mean crestal bone loss or gain for each implant unit.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Osseous Integration
Time Frame: 4 years
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anton Friedmann, DMD, Charite- Zentrum fur Zahnmedizin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

July 29, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Partial Edentulism

Clinical Trials on Osseotite Certain Prevail

Subscribe