Screening for Occult Malignancy in Patients With Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism (SOME)

July 2, 2015 updated by: Marc Carrier, MD, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Screening for Occult Malignancy in Patients With Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism: an Open Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Comprehensive Abdomen/Pelvis Computed Tomography

Blood clots in leg veins (deep vein thrombosis) or lung arteries (pulmonary embolism) that happen for no reason (i.e. unexplained) are both called "unprovoked venous thromboembolism" (VTE). These unexplained blood clots can be the first symptom of cancer. Up to 10% of patients with unexplained blood clots will be diagnosed with cancer within one year of their blood clot diagnosis.

These cancers can be found anywhere in the body although the relationship appears stronger with the pancreas, ovary and liver. Cancer testing in patients with blood clots is controversial. There is presently a wide variety of expert opinions and practices. Previous studies showed that a limited cancer screen including a medical history, physical examination, basic blood work and chest X-ray, will find about 90% of cancers. More recent and better designed studies showed that the limited cancer screen misses many cancers and needs to be improved. More extensive cancer testing may find more cancers but is potentially uncomfortable for patients, costs a lot of money and involves a lot of people.

The "comprehensive computed tomography" is less uncomfortable, inexpensive, radiological test made to find many cancers at once. Thus, the scientific question to be asked is: Does a "comprehensive computed tomography" miss less cancers than a limited cancer screen in patients with blood clots?

The main goal of this study is to find out if a "comprehensive computed tomography" misses less cancers than a limited cancer screen in patients with unexplained blood clots.

The second goal of the study is 1) to find out if a "comprehensive computed tomography" finds more "curable" cancers than the limited cancer screen; 2) to find out if the patients diagnosed with cancer are still alive and cancer-free after one year (i.e. the patients with curable cancer were treated and are doing well); 3) to prove that a negative "comprehensive computed tomography" means that the patient will not have cancer and; 4) to find out if a "comprehensive computed tomography" is well tolerated and safe for patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

862

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
        • St. Boniface Hospital
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
        • Capital Health Centre for Research
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
      • London, Ontario, Canada
        • London Health Sciences Center
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • Ottawa Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Montreal General Hospital
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Sacre-Coeur Hospital
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • St. Mary's Hospital Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a new diagnosis of unprovoked proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) will be eligible to participate into the study:

    • Unprovoked VTE is defined as the absence of any of the following predisposing factors:

      1. known active cancer;
      2. recent (less than 3 months) paralysis, paresis or plaster immobilization of the lower extremities;
      3. recently bedridden for period of 3 or more days, or major surgery, within the previous 12 weeks requiring general or regional anaesthesia;
      4. previous unprovoked VTE;
      5. known thrombophilia (hereditary or acquired)
    • Proximal DVT is defined as a non-compressibility of any vein segment from the common femoral vein to the trifurcation of the popliteal vein or a persistent intra-luminal filling defect of the iliac, common femoral, superficial femoral or popliteal veins on contrast venography.
    • Pulmonary embolism is defined as:

      1. patients with a high/intermediate pre-test probability (Wells' model > 4) + high probability V/Q scan;
      2. positive pulmonary angiogram; or
      3. spiral CT demonstrating intraluminal filling defect in a vessel larger than a segmental artery

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded from the study if they have any of the following criteria:

  • Age < 18 years-old;
  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent;
  • Greater than 21 days post diagnosis of idiopathic VTE
  • Index VTE event of UEDVT or unusual site DVT
  • Diagnosis of SSPE in the absence of above or below knee DVT
  • Allergy to contrast media;
  • Creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min;
  • Claustrophobia or agoraphobia;
  • Weight > 130 kg;
  • Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis; and
  • Diagnosis of glaucoma
  • Current pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Limited Malignancy Screening

1) A complete medical history and physical examination; 2) complete blood count; 3) liver function tests (AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, LDH); 4) renal function test (creatinine); 5) chest X-ray (if not performed in the past year)

In women, a pap smear/pelvic examination (if > 18 and < 70 years old and not performed during the past year),a mammogram (> 50 years old) will be performed if not conducted in last year. Similarly for men, prostate examination +/- PSA testing (>40 years old) will be performed if not conducted in the past year.

Experimental: Extensive Malignancy Screening
Limited screen as described above in combination with comprehensive computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis
Virtual colonoscopy and gastroscopy, a biphasic enhanced CT for hepatoma and renal cell carcinoma, parenchymal pancreatogram with minimum intensity projection (MinIP) reformation for pancreatic carcinoma, and finally uniphasic enhanced CT of distended bladder for bladder and ovarian carcinomas.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Previously undiagnosed malignancy "missed" by malignancy screening defined as biopsy proven tissue diagnosis of malignancy diagnosed from the time of malignancy screening completion to the end of the 1 year follow-up period.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall mortality
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Recurrent VTE
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Early malignancy: T1-2N0M0 as per the World Health Organization TNM classification system
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
QALYs gained
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Adverse events with cCT
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc Carrier, MD MSc FRCPC, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

October 16, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe