- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00776581
Ten-year Practice of Labor Pain Control in China (POPIC)
September 17, 2009 updated by: Nanjing Medical University
A Ten-year Practice of Labor Pain Control in China
Since 1999, labor pain control has being performed in China, and the initial time of analgesia is at the cervix >= 2 cm.
Meanwhile, American Society of Obstetrics & Gynecology recommended that the labor analgesia with neuraxial block should be performed at the cervix >= 4 cm in 2002.
After that, the threshold has been revised to at least >= 2 cm in 2006 by the Society.
However, in China, the practice of labor analgesia with neuraxial block has being performed for over seven years.
Up until now, the practice has being experienced during this ten-year period at the cervix around 1 cm.
The investigators hypothesized that labor pain control in different stages had different characteristics and had different influence on patients short- and long-lasting outcomes.
This study is mainly investigating different labor analgesia procedures in different stages since the initiation of the practice in 1999, and assessing their influence on the outcomes to display the trajectory of development of labor analgesia in China of which might fit to the the whole process of the study of labor analgesia throughout the world.
All these were done by analyzing the data records since from January 1999 to December 2008.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
40000
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210004
- Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 45 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
All parturients delivered in the investigator's institution since from January 1999 to December 2008
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Parturients used labor analgesia
Exclusion Criteria:
Following criteria were based on the records of information received from the ten-year practice screened by investigators:
- Chronic pain and psychiatric diseases records
- Participants younger than 18 years or older than 45 years
- Alcohol addictive or narcotic dependent patients were excluded for their influence on the analgesic efficacy of the epidural analgesics
- Subjects with a nonvertex presentation or scheduled induction of labor
- Diagnosed diabetes mellitus and pregnancy-induced hypertension
- Twin gestation and breech presentation
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
1
Records regarding combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA) with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump
|
Records regarding combined spinal-epidural analgesia with patient-controlled pump
|
2
Records regarding combined spinal-epidural analgesia with intermittent bolus injection (IBI)
|
Records regarding combined spinal-epidural analgesia with intermittent bolus injection
|
3
Records regarding epidural analgesia (EA) with patient-controlled pump
|
Records regarding epidural analgesia with patient-controlled pump
|
4
Records regarding epidural analgesia with intermittent bolus injection
|
Records regarding epidural analgesia with intermittent bolus injection
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Rate of cesarean delivery
Time Frame: Analgesia initiation to successful vaginal delivery
|
Analgesia initiation to successful vaginal delivery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Maternal Visual Analog Scale (VAS) rating of pain
Time Frame: Prior to analgesia, latent phrase, active phrase, second stage of labor, posterior to vaginal delivery
|
Prior to analgesia, latent phrase, active phrase, second stage of labor, posterior to vaginal delivery
|
Breastfeeding success at 6 weeks after vaginal delivery
Time Frame: At the sixth week after successful delivery
|
At the sixth week after successful delivery
|
Neonatal one-minute Apgar scale
Time Frame: At the first minute of baby was born
|
At the first minute of baby was born
|
Neonatal five-minute Apgar scale
Time Frame: At the fifth minute of baby was born
|
At the fifth minute of baby was born
|
Low back pain at 3 months after vaginal delivery
Time Frame: At the third month after vaginal delivery
|
At the third month after vaginal delivery
|
Rate of instrument-assisted delivery
Time Frame: Analgesia initiation to successful vaginal delivery
|
Analgesia initiation to successful vaginal delivery
|
Indications of cesarean delivery
Time Frame: Analgesia initiation to cesarean section
|
Analgesia initiation to cesarean section
|
Duration of analgesia
Time Frame: Initiation of analgesia to the disappearance of sensory block
|
Initiation of analgesia to the disappearance of sensory block
|
Maternal satisfaction with analgesia
Time Frame: At the end of the vaginal delivery
|
At the end of the vaginal delivery
|
Maternal oral temperature
Time Frame: Analgesia initiation to successful vaginal delivery
|
Analgesia initiation to successful vaginal delivery
|
Use of oxytocin after analgesia
Time Frame: After analgesia to vaginal delivery
|
After analgesia to vaginal delivery
|
Incidence of maternal side effects
Time Frame: Analgesia initiation to successful vaginal delivery
|
Analgesia initiation to successful vaginal delivery
|
Umbilical-cord gases analysis
Time Frame: At the time baby was born
|
At the time baby was born
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2009
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2009
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 20, 2008
First Posted (Estimate)
October 21, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
September 18, 2009
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 17, 2009
Last Verified
September 1, 2009
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NMU-FY2008-MZ013
- NJFY081005
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Labor Pain
-
Cukurova UniversityRecruitingLabor Pain, Labor Perception, Hormone Levels and Childbirth ComfortTurkey
-
Soovu Labs Inc.Virginia Mason Hospital/Medical CenterNot yet recruiting
-
Bogomolets National Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-WittenbergRecruiting
-
Maimonides Medical CenterTerminated
-
Aretaieio HospitalRecruitingLabor Pain | Pain, Labor | EpiduralGreece
-
Mashhad University of Medical SciencesTerminatedDecrease Labor Pain
-
Amasya UniversityAtaturk UniversityNot yet recruitingSatisfaction, Patient | Pain, Labor
-
University Medical Centre LjubljanaCompletedLabor Pain | Labor; Prolonged, First Stage | Labor; Prolonged, Second StageSlovenia
Clinical Trials on CSEA with PCA
-
Bora BilalNot yet recruitingPostoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) Block for Knee ArthroscopyPostoperative PainTurkey
-
Taichung Veterans General HospitalUnknownPain, PostoperativeTaiwan
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingCancer | ProstateUnited States
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalNot yet recruitingBrachial Plexus Block | Analgesia, Patient-Controlled | Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
-
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityTerminatedProspective Trial: Pain Management After Pectus Excavatum Repair, Epidural Versus PCA (PectusEpiPCA)Pectus ExcavatumUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUnknownKnee Osteoarthritis | Metabolic Disease
-
SOTIO a.s.CompletedProstate CancerCzechia