Bronchodilators and Respiratory Mechanics in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients

July 16, 2012 updated by: dr. Stefano Nava, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Effect of Bronchodilators on Respiratory Mechanics in COPD Patients With Poor Reversibility

The aim of this study is to assess the effects on respiratory mechanics of one "classical" short-term bronchodilator (i.e., salbutamol) versus placebo, and to verify the hypothesis that the addition of another bronchodilator (i.e., anticholinergic) may induce a further improvement on the work of breathing of stable COPD patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Studies with long-acting b2-agonists in COPD patients who poorly respond to routine airways obstruction reversibility tests with forced expiratory manoeuvres, such as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), are scarce. Such studies, however, seem to show favourable effects on clinical parameters.

This may explain the subjective improvements and changes in quality of life with long-acting b2-agonists in patients with COPD. The lack of effect on forced expiration tests may be due to early airway collapse and subsequent airflow decline causing underestimation of the existing bronchodilatory effects located more peripherally in the respiratory tract, where the major site of resistance is located in obstructive lung disease.

We therefore design a study aimed to assess the short term effects of one short-acting beta2-agonist vs placebo, and the effects of an additional and sequential administration of a different bronchodilator, like tiotropium bromide (anticholinergic agent) on the work of breathing, and its components (i.e., lung resistances and compliance) of COPD patients with poor reversibility assessed using the classical Pulmonary Function Tests.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • PV
      • Pavia, PV, Italy, 27100
        • Respiratory Unit Fondazione S.Maugeri

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • COPD patient with a Tiffenau ratio <55% and >25% predicted
  • Poor reversibility to an acute bronchodilator test (i.e. FEV1 changes<10% from baseline)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of informed consent
  • Cancer
  • Concomitant lung and airways diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Salbutamol+Tiotropium
Salbutamol will be given at the dose of 400 micrograms and Tiotropium at the dose of 18 micrograms
Salbutamol 400 micrograms + Tiotropium 18 micrograms
Other Names:
  • Spiriva
  • Ventolin
Placebo Comparator: placebo + Tiotropium
Placebo using MDI + administration of Tiotropium after 20 minutes
Placebo via MDI + Tiotropium 18 micrograms
Other Names:
  • Spiriva

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Recordings of respiratory mechanics
Time Frame: 90 minutes
90 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Dyspnea score
Time Frame: 90 minutes
90 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

October 31, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2012

Last Verified

July 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe