Safe and Efficacious Artemisinin-based Combination Treatments for African Pregnant Women With Malaria (PREGACT)

March 11, 2016 updated by: Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
Malaria is the most important human parasitic disease and is responsible of high morbidity and mortality in resource-poor countries. Pregnant women, who are a high-risk group, are almost always excluded from clinical trials; thus, the investigators lack sufficient information on the safety and efficacy of most antimalarials in pregnancy. The recommendation of the World Health Organization to use artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) in the 2nd and 3rd trimester is already implemented in several African countries, however documentation of their efficacy and safety in pregnancy is still limited. Thus, the investigators propose to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4 ACT(artemether-lumefantrine, amodiaquine-artesunate, mefloquine-artesunate and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine), when used to treat pregnant women with P. falciparum malaria; the results will help to recommend the optimal therapy for this high-risk group in Africa.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Malaria is the most important human parasitic disease. Although pregnant women are a high-risk group, they are almost systematically excluded from clinical trials, for fear of teratogenicity and embryotoxicity; thus, we generally lack sufficient information on the safety and efficacy of most antimalarials in pregnancy, as well as evidence-based recommendations for the prevention and treatment of malaria during pregnancy.

The WHO recommendation to use artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) in the 2nd and 3rd trimester is already implemented in several African countries. However, the documentation of their efficacy and safety in pregnancy is still limited, especially concerning the African contexts.

Therefore, we propose to test 4 fixed-dose combinations (artemether-lumefantrine, amodiaquine-artesunate, mefloquine-artesunate and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine), to evaluate their efficacy and safety when administered to pregnant women (2nd and 3rd trimester) infected with P. falciparum. Explanatory variables will be collected for treatment failure (PCR-corrected) and for recurrent parasitaemia. The primary hypothesis tested will be the clinical equivalence (pair-wise non-inferiority) of the 4 treatment regimens with clinical equivalence defined as difference in treatment failure rates (PCR corrected) of 5% or less.

In addition, an attempt will be done to carry out in vitro testing at the time of recurrent infection. However, the success of the test will depend on the parasite density. In addition, blood samples collected on filter paper at day 0 and at day of recurrent parasitaemia will be genotyped for the search of known molecular markers related to drug resistance. Not all samples will be analyzed; rather these will be selected according to the therapeutic response so that the prevalence of molecular markers will be compared between treatment successes, true treatment failures and new infections.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3428

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nanoro, Burkina Faso
        • ISSR/Centre Muraz
      • Nazoanga, Burkina Faso
        • ISSR/Centre Muraz
      • Effiduase, Ghana
        • Effiduase Government Hospital
    • Ashanti Region
      • Ejisu Sekyere East, Ashanti Region, Ghana
        • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Technology, Kumasi
      • Juaben Government Hospital, Ashanti Region, Ghana
        • Kwame Nrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi
    • Blantyre
      • Chikwawa District Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi
        • College of Medicine, University of Malawi
    • Nchelenge District
      • Nchelenge, Nchelenge District, Zambia
        • St Paul hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Gestation of at least 16 weeks and <37 weeks;
  • P. falciparum monoinfection of any density, with or without symptoms
  • Hb equal or higher than 7 g/dL;
  • At least 15 years old;
  • Residence within the health facility catchment's area;
  • Willing to deliver at the health facility;
  • Willing to adhere to study requirements (including in Zambia and Malawi, HIV VCT)
  • Ability to provide written informed consent; if the woman is minor of age/not emancipated, the consent must be given by a parent or legal guardian according to national law (however, in this case, the investigator is responsible to check that the woman herself is also freely willing to take part in the study, and the woman will be asked to sign for "assent").

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of allergic reactions to the study drugs;
  • History of known pregnancy complications or bad obstetric history such as repeated stillbirths or eclampsia;
  • History or presence of major illnesses likely to influence pregnancy outcome including diabetes mellitus, severe renal or heart disease, or active tuberculosis;
  • Current cotrimoxazole prophylaxis or ARV treatment;
  • Any significant illness at the time of screening that requires hospitalization, including severe malaria;
  • Intent to move out of the study catchment area before delivery or deliver at relative's home out of the catchment area.
  • Prior enrollment in the study or concurrent enrollment in another study.
  • Unable to take oral medication
  • Clear evidence of recent (1 week) treatment with antimalarials or antimicrobials with antimalarial activity (clindamycin; azythromycin; etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: DHAPQ
Three-day treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine
DHA-PQ tablets are green film coated intended for oral use and contain 20/160mg or 40/320mg of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) and piperaquine phosphate (PQ) respectively. In this trial the 40/320mg for adults will be used. Developed by Sigma Tau in partnership with Medicines for Malaria Venture.
Other Names:
  • DHAPQ, Eurartesim
EXPERIMENTAL: MQAS
Three-day treatment with mefloquine artesunate
MQAS will be provided as a fixed-dose ACT. There are 2 strengths (AS25+MQ55mg and AS100+MQ220mg) and dosing regimen is calculated according to 12 mg/kg AS and 24mg/kgMQ total dose over three days. Pregnant women will receive 2 tablets/day for 3 days. It is developed by Farmanguinhos with the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative. To be noted: if the FDCs will not get the WHO pre-qualification before the start of recruitment, the separate AS and MQ will be used
Other Names:
  • MQAS
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: AQAS
Three-day treatment with artesunate-amodiaquine
AQAS, developed by teh DNDi with Sanofi-Aventis and manufactured by Sanofi-Aventis, has been pre-qualified by the WHO in 2008 and is available in several African countries, including those involved in this trial. AQ-AS tablets are round, yellow on one side and white-slightly yellow on the other, with a breaking bar, AS engraved on one side and either 25, 50 or 100 on the other side. Tablets to be used in this trial are those 100mg/270mg AS/AQ, containing 100 mg of artesunate, 352.640 mg of amodiaquine hydrochloride corresponding to 270mg of amodiaquine base.
Other Names:
  • AQAS, artesunate-amodiaquine Winthrop®
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: AL
Three day treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem(R)
AL (tablets containing a FDC of 20 mg of artemether and 120 mg of lumefantrine) is manufactured by Novartis and has been extensively used in Africa for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. AL was registered in Switzerland in 1999, has since received marketing authorisation in several endemic and non-endemic countries and it is WHO pre-qualified.
Other Names:
  • AL, Coartem, Riamet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Treatment Failure (PCR adjusted)
Time Frame: Day 63
Day 63
Safety profiles including significant changes in relevant laboratory values
Time Frame: Until delivery
Until delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to failure
Time Frame: Case by case
Case by case
PCR unadjusted treatment failure
Time Frame: Day 63
Day 63
Gametocyte carriage (gametocyte-weeks)
Time Frame: Case by case
Case by case
Asexual parasite clearance time
Time Frame: Days to 2 consecutive negative blood slides.
Days to 2 consecutive negative blood slides.
Gametocytaemia (prevalence and density)
Time Frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28 and 63 after treatment
Day 7, 14, 21, 28 and 63 after treatment
Haemoglobin changes
Time Frame: Days 14, 28, 42 and 63
Days 14, 28, 42 and 63
The presence of acute, chronic or past infection of the placenta (prevalence)
Time Frame: Delivery
Delivery
Mean birth weight and prevalence of low birth weight newborns
Time Frame: Delivery
Delivery
In vitro vitro and search of molecular markers related to drug resistance
Time Frame: At the time of recurrent infection
At the time of recurrent infection
Determination of the PK profile of MQ, AQ and PQ (on 120 women/treatment)
Time Frame: Case by case
Case by case

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Umberto D'Alessandro, MD, Institute Tropical Medicine Belgium and MRC Unit in The Gambia
  • Principal Investigator: Tinto Halidou, PharmD, Centre Muraz

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 27, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe