Comparing the Effectiveness of New Versus Older Treatments for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (The NOTA Study)

July 30, 2013 updated by: Duke University

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate Transdermal System (Daytrana), Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (Vyvanse), OROS MPH (Concerta), and Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended Release (Adderall XR) in Children and Adolescents With ADHD

This study will determine whether two new psychostimulant medications are more effective, tolerable, and acceptable than two older medications for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by impulsiveness, hyperactivity, and inattention. It is seen primarily in children and adolescents and is often treated with psychostimulant medications. Osmotic-release oral system (OROS) methylphenidate, brand name Concerta, and mixed amphetamine salts extended release, brand name Adderall XR, are psychostimulant medications that have shown both efficacy (that they can have therapeutic benefits) and effectiveness (that they typically have therapeutic benefits in practice). Two newer psychostimulant medications-lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, brand name Vyvanse, and methylphenidate transdermal system, brand name Daytrana-have shown efficacy but have not been tested for effectiveness, nor have they been tested head-to-head against the older psychostimulants. This study will test the effectiveness, tolerability (lack of side effects), and acceptability (ease of use for patients) of the two newer psychostimulant medications and compare them to each other and to the two older psychostimulants.

Participation in this study will last 6 weeks, although some treatments may continue past the end of the study. At enrollment, participants will undergo a series of baseline evaluations. These will include interviews and assessments of ADHD symptoms, concurrent psychiatric disorders, medical and psychiatric history, family history of mental illness, risk and protective factors, other treatments, treatment expectancy of both the youth and parent, and vital signs. In consultation with their doctors, participants will be allowed to exclude zero, one, or two of the study medications; if they choose to exclude both of the new ADHD medications, they will not able to participate in the study. Participants will then be randomly assigned to one of the treatments they choose to include. They will receive a prescription for the medication and instructions for how to use it from their doctors; the study protocol does not specify a particular treatment regimen. Participants will undergo a second set of evaluations after 6 weeks of treatment or before, if the treatment ends earlier. This will include interviews and assessments similar to those administered at baseline as well as evaluation of any medication side effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

228

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Trials Network (CAPTN)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meets DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD combined, hyperactive/impulsive, or inattentive subtype
  • Outpatient at study entry
  • Speaks English
  • Willing to be randomly assigned to one of the study treatment options as outlined in the protocol
  • No known significant history of cardiovascular disorders, including pre-existing congenital heart disease, structural heart disease, known clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, or other clinically significant cardiac disorder
  • Willing to initiate study medication for ADHD within 7 days of the study baseline visit
  • May be receiving stable treatment with other drug for a comorbid disorder, defined as no changes in dose or form of drug treatment for at least 2 weeks prior to the study enrollment visit
  • May be receiving psychosocial interventions for ADHD or a comorbid disorder, defined as no changes in form of psychosocial treatment for at least 4 weeks prior to the study enrollment visit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypersensitivity to study medication
  • Inpatient status at study entry
  • Currently taking another medication for ADHD, including another psychostimulant, atomoxetine, or bupropion
  • Receiving treatment with a tricyclic antidepressant at study enrollment, with the exception of low-dose imipramine for enuresis or amitriptyline for chronic pain
  • Received treatment with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within the past 30 days
  • Psychostimulant drug dependence, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia
  • Presence of psychosis
  • Severe mental retardation
  • Autism or Asperger's syndrome
  • Active suicidal ideation
  • Unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol
  • Demonstrates a lack of benefit from, an intolerance to, or contraindication to psychostimulant medicine
  • Presence of other clinically significant medical conditions, including hyperthyroidism, epilepsy or other seizure disorder, any condition for which an increase in blood pressure or heart rate would be problematic, glaucoma or other significant eye disease for which a psychostimulant would be problematic, or pre-existing gastrointestinal obstruction with gastrointestinal narrowing
  • Pregnant or positive result of pregnancy test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Participants will receive methylphenidate transdermal system.
Not specified in protocol; determined by local standard of care.
Other Names:
  • Daytrana
Active Comparator: 2
Participants will receive lisdexamfetamine dimesylate.
Not specified in protocol; determined by local standard of care.
Other Names:
  • Vyvanse
Active Comparator: 3
Participants will receive osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS MPH).
Not specified in protocol; determined by local standard of care.
Other Names:
  • Concerta
Active Comparator: 4
Participants will receive mixed amphetamine salts extended release.
Not specified in protocol; determined by local standard of care.
Other Names:
  • Adderall XR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dichotomized Clinical Global Impression-Effectiveness (CGI-E) Scale
Time Frame: Measured at each participant's last visit, which can occur at or before Week 6
The CGI-E is the value at which the participant's Therapeutic Benefit and Adverse Impact to the study drug intersect. This number is determined by combining each participant's scores for the degree of Therapeutic Benefit versus the degree to which problems with Tolerability and/or Acceptability adversely impact the subject. Participants are then determined to be Responders or Non-responders to the study medication. For example, a subject who is very much improved (CGI-I=1) or much improved (CGI-I=2) therapeutically and whose adverse impact rating is none (score 1,5) or mild (score 2,6) will be categorized as a Responder. All others whose adverse impact rating is moderate (score 3,7,11,15)or outweighs therapeutic effect (score 4,8,12,16) will be categorized as Non-responders to study medication. The CGI scores are totaled for each participant and a mean score is calculated. A median total score was calculated for each treatment group.
Measured at each participant's last visit, which can occur at or before Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale
Time Frame: Measured at each participant's last visit, which can occur at or before Week 6
The CGI-I score at the subject's last study visit at or before Week 6, is one of the 3 secondary endpoints that contribute to the primary endpoint (CGI-E). The CGI-I scale will be used to rate improvement in the subject's condition (benefits) since baseline using the following 7-point scale: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=not changed, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse; 7=very much worse.
Measured at each participant's last visit, which can occur at or before Week 6
Clinical Global Improvements-Acceptability (CGI-A) Scale
Time Frame: Measured at each participant's last visit, which can occur at or before Week 6
The CGI-A score at the subject's last study visit at or before Week 6 is one of the 3 secondary endpoints that contribute to the primary endpoint (CGI-E). The CGI-A will be used to assess the acceptability of the study medication with respect to the subject's experience with the formulation of medication. The 7-point rating for the CGI-A will be: 1=very high acceptability, 2=high acceptability, 3=above average acceptability, 4=average acceptability, 5=low acceptability, 6=very low acceptability, 7=extremely low acceptability
Measured at each participant's last visit, which can occur at or before Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2013

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe