Study to Compare the Diagnostic Accuracy of Nuance Full-Field Digital Mammography to Screen-Film Mammography

June 7, 2011 updated by: Planmed Oy
Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Planmed Sophie Nuance Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) X-ray System compared to screen-film mammography (SFM) in the detection of breast cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

Objectives: 1) To establish the non-inferiority of the diagnostic accuracy of the Planmed Sophie Nuance Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) X-ray System compared to screen-film mammography (SFM) in the detection of breast cancer; and 2) To demonstrate in a comparative side-by-side feature analysis that interpretations based on the Planmed Sophie Nuance FFDM X-ray System are diagnostically non-inferior to SFM in the detection of breast cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
        • Mroz-Baier Breast Care Clinic
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77034
        • The Rose

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is 40 years of age or older
  2. Subject is presenting for routine breasts cancer screening (Cohort I) OR Subject has one or both breasts scored 4 or 5 on the BI-RADS scale as a result of SFM either for routine breast cancer screening or for follow-up or diagnostic mammography (Cohort II)
  3. Subject's schedule permits the SFM and the FFDM to be performed no more than 30 days apart and with no intervention between the exams
  4. Subject will provide prospective, written informed consent
  5. Subject is considered capable of complying with study procedures including a willingness to return for a one-year follow-up exam -

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is pregnant or possibly pregnant or planning pregnancy within the next 15 months
  2. Subject has undergone a breast augmentation or breast implant? Has subject had any of the following breast procedures?

    Fine needle or cyst aspiration NOT Eligible if within past year Biopsy Not Eligible if within past year Lumpectomy (for breast cancer) Mastectomy (for breast cancer) Radiation therapy Breast reconstruction Breast reduction Not Eligible if within past year

  3. Subject has had an invasive breast procedure or operation within the past year
  4. Subject has significant existing breast trauma
  5. Subject has a history of breast cancer treated with operation or radiation
  6. Subject has any other condition or personal circumstance that, in the judgment of the investigator, might interfere with the collection of complete good quality data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: mammography
Women must be at least 40 years of age, presenting for routine breast cancer screening or presenting with one or both breasts scored 4 or 5 on the BI-RADS scale as a result of SFM either for routine breast cancer screening or for follow-up or diagnostic mammography
Full Field Digital Mammogram
Other Names:
  • mammography
  • digital mammography

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Area under ROC curve based on subjects' maximum POM scores; sensitivity based on subjects' maximum BI-RADS scores with 4 or higher as positive for cancer; and specificity based on subjects maximum BI-RADS scores with 4 or higher as positive for cancer
Time Frame: Approximately one year after completion of study.
Approximately one year after completion of study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
area under the ROC curve based on the maximum POM score per subject-breast
Time Frame: Approximately one year after completion of study.
Approximately one year after completion of study.
area under the ROC curve based on the POM scores from the ten regions of a subject's breasts;
Time Frame: Approximately one year after completion of study.
Approximately one year after completion of study.
sensitivity based on subjects' maximum BI-RADS scores using a cut-point of 3 or higher as positive for cancer;
Time Frame: Approximately one year after completion of study.
Approximately one year after completion of study.
specificity based on subjects' maximum BI-RADS scores using a cut-point of 3 or higher as positive for cancer;
Time Frame: Approximately one year after completion of study.
Approximately one year after completion of study.
Sensitivity and specificity based on the maximum BI-RADS scores per subject-breast using 4 or higher for positive; and sensitivity and specificity based on the maximum BI-RADS scores per subject-breast using 3 or higher for positive.
Time Frame: Approximately one year after completion of study.
Approximately one year after completion of study.
Feature Analysis Study; side by side assessment of SFM and FFDM images and comparison of quality features: lesion conspicuity, tissue visibility at chest wall, tissue visibility at skin line, axillary details (MLO), overall contrast, overall sharpness
Time Frame: Approximately one year after completion of study.
Approximately one year after completion of study.
Adverse event assessment
Time Frame: Approximately 24 hours after completion of FFDM
Approximately 24 hours after completion of FFDM

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sami Tohka, PhD, Planmed Oy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 9, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2011

Last Verified

June 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TK01007

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe