Validating 4Ts for Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT)

July 24, 2009 updated by: Medstar Health Research Institute

Prospectively Validating the 4Ts and Chong Score for Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a scoring tool to help determine the presence of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is an adverse reaction to heparin. We hypothesize that this scoring tool will be very useful in excluding patients who are suspected of having HIT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

HIT is an immune response to heparin that can result in thrombogenic thrombocytopenia. It is often a difficult diagnosis to make, and its diagnosis is dependent upon both clinical and serologic criteria. Due to this ambiguity, increased testing and treatment may occur until serologic test results return. Recently, scoring tools have been developed to assist with the diagnosis of this disease. However, these scoring tools have yet to be validated. Thus, we plan to conduct a prospective, observational study to validate two scoring tools, the 4Ts and the Chong scale, in the diagnosis of HIT.

In order to validate these scoring tools, two physicians will independently score the 4Ts and the Chong scale for all patients suspected of having HIT. These patients will be identified if a physician has ordered HIT antibody testing using the enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method. Confirmatory testing with a serotonin release assay (SRA) will also be performed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Washington Hospital Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

For this study, patients already admitted to the hospital whose physician suspects the presence of HIT will be recruited for this study. Specifically, the trigger for recruitment include patients who have a HIT antibody test ordered.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with suspected HIT.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Suspected HIT
Those who are clinically suspected of having HIT will be enrolled in this study.
Two physicians will independently score both the 4Ts and the Chong scale on all patients enrolled in this study.
Patient serum will be collected to perform Serotonin Release Assay testing to verify the presence of HIT.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To validate the 4Ts as a pretest probability tool for HIT.
Time Frame: End of study.
End of study.
To validate the Chong scale as a tool to determine the post-test probability for HIT.
Time Frame: End of study.
End of study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine the inter-rater variability for scoring the 4Ts.
Time Frame: End of study.
End of study.
To determine the inter-rater variability for scoring the Chong scale.
Time Frame: End of study.
End of study.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chee M Chan, MD, Medstar Health Research Institute
  • Study Director: Andrew F Shorr, MD, MPH, Medstar Health Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 27, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 27, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2009

Last Verified

July 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe