Study of Intravitreal Microplasmin in Relieving Vitreo-Macular Adhesion in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

September 26, 2011 updated by: Steven Schwartz, University of California, Los Angeles

Resolution of Vitreomacular Adhesion (VMA) Associated With Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) With Intravitreal Microplasmin

The purpose of this study is to determine whether microplasmin given by intravitreal injection is effective and safe for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in patients who have focal vitreomacular adhesion (VMA)

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

The human vitreous gel undergoes progressive liquefaction with age. Concurrent with the process of vitreous liquefaction, there is a weakening of the adhesion at the vitreoretinal interface between the cortical vitreous gel and the inner limiting lamina. Posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) is a separation of the cortical vitreous get from the inner limiting lamina. PVD is usually a sudden event during which liquefied vitreous from the center of the vitreous body bursts through a hole in the posterior vitreous cortex and then dissects the residual cortex gel away from the inner limiting lamina. If there is residual vitreoretinal traction around the break, this process may induce a tear in the retina that can in turn result in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, macular hole, or cystoid macular edema. The importance of the vitreous in the progression of diabetic retinopathy may also extend beyond tractional considerations. For example, it is believed that the vitreous serves as scaffolding for new vessel formation and may also contribute to molecular imbalances that lead to retinopathy progression. Therefore, total PVD, by releasing vitreoretinal traction as well as other potential mechanisms, may be beneficial in various vitreoretinal diseases such as neovascular AMD.

Vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) in exudative (wet) AMD may be associated with poor prognosis in patients with AMD. This trial is primarily aimed at showing that release of VMA can be induced by microplasmin, a proteolytic enzyme, in patients with wet AMD, and that microplasmin is safe in patients w/ neovascular (wet) AMD. Secondary endpoint will be assessment of improved AMD outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Recruiting
        • Jules Stein Eye Institute/UCLA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Steven D Schwartz, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jean-Pierre Hubschman, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subjects aged 50 years or older
  • Presence of focal vitreomacular adhesion as seen by OCT
  • BCVA of 20/800 or better in non-study eye
  • Presence of active choroidal neovascular membrane
  • Written informed consent obtained from subject prior to inclusion in the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have previously received microplasmin
  • Subjects with any vitreous hemorrhage or any other vitreous opacification which precludes adequate examination or investigation of study eye
  • Patient with uncontrolled glaucoma including IOP >25 mm Hg
  • Subjects who have had vitrectomy or retinal detachment or who are aphakic or highly myopic (>8.0 D) in the study eye
  • Subjects who are pregnant or of child-bearing potential not utilizing an acceptable form of contraception. Acceptable methods include intrauterine device, oral, implanted or injected contraceptives, and barrier methods with spermicide.
  • Subjects who, in the Investigator's view, will not complete all visits and investigations
  • Patient who have PDT or any intravitreal injection in the last 10 days. Patients who in the examiners opinion will need intravitreal injection in the next 10 days (apart from microplasmin).
  • Patients who have participated in an investigational drug trial in the past 30 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: microplasmin, intravitreal injection
Subjects will receive one intravitreal injection of microplasmin on Day 0.
Microplasmin, 1.875 mg, will be given by intravitreal injection,on Day 0.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Subjects will receive one intravitreal injection of the placebo on Day 0.
The placebo control will be the microplasmin vehicle without the microplasmin.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcome is the proportion of patients in whom there is release of vitreomacular traction as assessed by ultrasonography, optical coherence tomography and physical examination
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total number of ranibizumab injections following microplasmin in those with PVD compared with those without PVD
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Change in mean macular thickness
Time Frame: Day 28 and month 12
Day 28 and month 12
Mean change in ETDRS visual acuity
Time Frame: Day 28 and Month 12
Day 28 and Month 12
Incidence and severity of ocular adverse events
Time Frame: Day 28 and Month 12
Day 28 and Month 12
Incidence and severity of nonocular adverse events
Time Frame: Day 28 and Month 12
Day 28 and Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steven D Schwartz, M.D., University of California, Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 16, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 27, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2011

Last Verified

September 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on Microplasmin

3
Subscribe