Early Detection of Lung Tumors by Sniffer Dogs - Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity

May 6, 2013 updated by: Thorsten Walles, Schillerhoehe Hospital

Prospective Clinical Study to Determine the Predictive Value of Sniffer Dogs to Identify Lung Cancer in the Exhalation of Patients With and Without Pulmonary Disease

Some groups reported that sniffer dogs can be applied to detect lung cancer in the exhaled breath of patients. Therefore, breath samples (BS) of patients are collected. Five sniffer dogs are trained to distinguish between the BS of patients with lung cancer and healthy individuals (controls). In a prospective, randomized blinded study the dog's ability to differentiate between BS of i) patients with lung cancer, ii) patients with inflammatory airway disease, but no evidence of cancer and iii) healthy individuals is tested.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All breath samples (BS) are collected in patients on the basis of radiologic findings before any intervention (bronchoscopy, biopsy or surgery) has been performed. The allocation to study groups is made following diagnostic work up and surgery.

Three study groups are defined using the following inclusion and exclusion criteria:

  • lung cancer: male & female, age 18-80, competent, confirmed lung cancer in diagnostic work up and surgery, no history or present other tumor disease
  • healthy individual: male & female, age 18-80, competent, no history or present other tumor disease including lung cancer, no pathological lung function tests
  • chronic obstructive lung disease: male & female, age 18-80, competent, no history or present other tumor disease including lung cancer, pathological lung function tests

For each patient, i) history, ii) present medication, iii) lung function tests are documented. For the lung cancer patients, the tumor stage following surgery is documented.

Five sniffer dogs are trained using BS of lung cancer patients and healthy individuals. After completion of the training the ability of the dogs to differentiate between the groups is tested:

  • 5 BS are presented in 1 experiment:

    • Test I: lung cancer vs healthy individual
    • Test II: lung cancer vs chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    • Test III: lung cancer vs healthy individuals & bronchitis
  • for every experiment 1 BS of a lung cancer patient is used

    • the lung cancer sample is placed randomly in one of the five test tubes
    • the other test tubes are used for BS of healthy individuals or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients or both
    • neither the dog handler nor the dog know the loading of the test tubes
  • experiments are repeated 5 to 10 times

For analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of the dog's reaction is determined.

The patient's medication, smoking habits, age and gender are analysed to rule out confounders or bias.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

230

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gerlingen, Germany, 70839
        • Schillerhoehe Hospital
      • Stuttgart, Germany, 70178
        • Praxis Heimann & Ehmann

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-80
  • competent
  • confirmed lung cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of other cancers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: healthy individual
healthy individual with no lung disease and no history of cancer including lung cancer
breath sample is presented to sniffer dog in test tube
Experimental: lung cancer
breath samples of patients with confirmed lung cancer
breath sample is presented to sniffer dog in test tube
Active Comparator: underlying lung disease
patients with underlying lung disease and impairment in lung function
breath sample is presented to sniffer dog in test tube

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
presence of an heretofore unknown substrate in the exhalation sample of a patient with confirmed lung cancer
Time Frame: baseline
number of individuals in the study cohort with confirmed lung cancer whose exhalation sample is correctly identified by sniffer dogs to contain an heretofore unknown substrate that is associated with lung cancer
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
absence of an heretofore unknown substrate that is associated with lung cancer in patients with lung disease but excluded lung cancer
Time Frame: baseline
number of individuals with confirmed impairment of lung function but exclusion of lung cancer whose exhalation sample is wrongly identified by sniffer dogs to contain a heretofore unknown substrate that is associated with lung cancer
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thorsten Walles, MD, Schillerhoehe Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 7, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe