Pregabalin Trial In HIV Neuropathic Pain

An Open-Label, Extension Safety Trial Of Pregabalin In Subjects With Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy (Pregabalin A0081251)

This study examines the safety of pregabalin over a 6 month period in patients with neuropathic pain associated with HIV infection as an extension of another trial that tests the efficacy of pregabalin.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The parent double blind study was stopped at interim analysis due to lack of efficacy and therefore this open label extension study was also terminated simultaneously on April 2, 2012; the termination was unrelated to any safety findings that could impact patient health.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

217

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cundinamarca
      • Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia, 0000
        • Asistencia Cientifica de Alta Complejidad
      • Bogota D.C., Cundinamarca, Colombia
        • Riesgo de Fractura S.A.
    • Andhra Pradesh
      • Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, 500 072
        • Surakshaka Multispeciality Hospital
    • Gujarat
      • Ahemdabad, Gujarat, India, 380 009
        • Infectious disease clinic
    • Maharashtra
      • Pune, Maharashtra, India, 411 004
        • Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre
      • Lima, Peru, L 01
        • Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo
      • Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico, 00935
        • RCMI-Clinical Research Center
      • Durban, South Africa, 4001
        • Synapta Clinical Research Centre
      • Paarl, South Africa, 7626
        • Paarl Research Center
      • Paarl, South Africa, 7646
        • Be Part Yoluntu Centre
    • Eastern Cape
      • Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa, 6065
        • MediSynergy
    • Gauteng
      • Benoni, Gauteng, South Africa, 1500
        • Worthwhile Clinical Trials (WWCT), Lake View Hospital
      • Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa, 1610
        • Toga Laboratory
      • Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa, 2113
        • Drs Essack and Mitha
      • Pretoria West, Gauteng, South Africa, 0117
        • Pretoria West Hospital
    • KwaZulu Natal
      • Stanger, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa, 4450
        • Dr J. Reddy's Surgery
    • Western Cape
      • Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa, 7925
        • University of Cape Town
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
        • South East Asia Research Collaboration with Hawaii
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10400
        • Neurology unit, Department of Medicine,
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85023
        • Arizona Research Center
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
        • Southwest Center For Hiv/Aids
    • California
      • Burbank, California, United States, 91505
        • Providence Clinical Research
      • Palm Springs, California, United States, 92262
        • Desert Medical Group, Inc., dba Desert Oasis Healthcare Medical Group
      • Palm Springs, California, United States, 92262
        • Desert Medical Group, Inc., dba Desert Oasis Helathcare Medical Group
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • University of California San Diego
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University Medical Center
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States, 33180
        • South Florida Medical Research
      • Aventura, Florida, United States, 33180
        • Neuroscience Consultants, LLC
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who participated in the preceding A0081244 double-blind trial and completed at least through Visit 9 of that trial.

Subjects with painful distal sensory polyneuropathy (DSP) interested in treatment based on investigator's clinical judgment.

Subjects who had acceptable tolerability of study drug in A0081244.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically significant or unstable conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise participation in the study. This includes, for example, medical conditions such as, but not limited to: hepatic, renal, respiratory, hematological, immunological, cardiovascular diseases, arrhythmia, inflammatory or rheumatologic disease, active infections, symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, psychiatric illness, and untreated endocrine disorders.
  • Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study.
  • Active Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)- defining Opportunistic Infection (OI) that requires hospitalization.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pregabalin (Lyrica)
150 mg-600 mg/day (twice daily)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) neuropathy pain. Number of participants who responded "Yes/No" to Question 1: Are you currently employed (working for pay)? are reported.
Baseline, Week 24
Absenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 2 and 3 assesses absenteeism as: Hours of work missed in past 7 days due to leg/foot pain or other reason, respectively. Question 4 assesses presenteeism as: Hours of work performed in past 7 days.
Baseline, Week 24
Productivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 5 and 6 assesses: How much leg/foot pain affect productivity and daily activity, respectively in past 7 days? on 11-point scale, where 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired).
Baseline, Week 24
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well being: physical and social (So) functioning (Fn), physical and emotional role (role-physical [R-P], role-emotional [R-E]) limitations, bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (Vit), mental health (MnH). Two summary scores include Physical Component (Ph C) and Mental Component (Mn C). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores. Score range for domain scores and summary scores: 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Baseline, Week 24
Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS-pain)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Participants rated the severity of HIV neuropathy pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)
Time Frame: Week 24
PGI-C: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status since the start of the study, on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in each category are reported.
Week 24
Number of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 25
S-STS:8-item clinician/participant administered prospective rating scale to assess TE suicidal(Su) ideation(ID),behavior(BHV).Items 1a,2-6,7a,8 scored on 5-point Likert scale 0(not at all) to 4(extremely). Items 1,1b,7 require yes/no response. S-STS total score range 0-30. Lower score=reduced Su tendency. Responses on S-STS were mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment(C-CASA) as 1:Completed Su; 2: Su attempt; 3: Preparatory acts; 4: Su ID; 5: Self-injurious (SI) BHV, intent unknown; 6: Not enough information; 7: SI BHV, no Su intent; 8: Other, no deliberate self harm.
Baseline up to Week 25
Number of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)
Time Frame: Baseline
PHQ-8: 8-item self-administered validated subset of PHQ-9, which comprises first 8 items of measure. Participant rated "Over past 2 weeks, how often bothered by any of following problems?": little interest in doing things(1); feeling down(2); trouble falling or staying asleep/sleeping too much(3); feeling tired(4); poor appetite/overeating(5); feeling bad about self(6); trouble concentrating(7); moving or speaking slowly or being so fidgety/moving around more than usual(8). Each item scored on scale of 0(not at all)-3(nearly every day). Total score range: 0-24, higher score=greater severity.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 16, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe