Maintaining Autonomy as we Age. Strategy Training for Age-related Executive Dysfunction.

November 8, 2017 updated by: Dr. Deirdre Dawson, Baycrest

Maintaining Autonomy as we Age: Investigating the Application of a Strategy Training Approach for Ameliorating the Effects of Age-related Executive Dysfunction - Part II

Healthy older adults with self-reported cognitive difficulties who receive strategy training will demonstrate greater performance benefits on measures of real-world activities, relative to those receiving a control intervention, immediately post treatment and at follow-up.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6A 2E1
        • Baycrest

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 90 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All participants must score within 1.5 standard deviation (SD) of age and education-corrected normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and on a battery of neuropsychological tests of attention, memory and executive function (which will insure that participants are unlikely to meet the criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)).
  • No clinically relevant depression (scores ≤22) on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
  • Fluent in written and spoken English
  • Self-reported complains about cognitive function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent bereavement (within last 6 months)
  • History of neurological disease
  • Psychiatric illness requiring hospitalization and/or history or current substance abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Training
The key features of the protocol are: i. Participants are actively engaged in selecting their treatment goals. The research clinician will work with the participants to identify five specific, measurable real-world goals using a standardized semi-structured interview, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Three of these will be training goals, two will not be trained but evaluated post-intervention for evidence of generalization and transfer to non-trained tasks; ii. A global problem solving approach is used (Goal- Plan- Do- Check). Participants are guided by the trainer to apply this strategy to their goals.
Other Names:
  • Adopted Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance (CO-OP)
Active Comparator: Psychosocial Education
The active comparator uses an information-based format and is designed to engage participants without providing any specific training techniques or strategies. During weekly sessions, participants will receive factual information on brain structure and function, age-related cognitive changes, and general brain health issues and will spend time doing non-specific cognitive exercises including crossword and Sudoku puzzles. Homework will consist of reading assignments related to the session topics.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Number of Goals Improved to Criterion on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time Frame: Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
COPM is a standardized semi-structure interview in which participants identify goals related to everyday life activities. Goals considered improved to criterion are those that had 2 or more points increase on COPM ratings.
Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General Self Efficacy Scale (GSE)
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
GSE is a self efficacy scale with a minimum score of 10 and a maximum score of 40. Higher scores indicate higher self efficacy
Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
Stanford Patient Education Research Center- General Health Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
Stanford Patient Education Research Center has different measures of health related behaviors. General Health is one of the subscales. scores range 1-5 and higher score indicate better general health
Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
Stanford Patient Education Research Center- Health Distress Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
Stanford Patient Education Research Center has different measures of health related behaviors. Health distress is one of the subscales. Scores range 0-20 and higher score indicates more distress.
Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
Stanford Patient Education Research Center- Physical Activity Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
Stanford Patient Education Research Center has different measures of health related behaviors. Physical activity is one of the subscales. Scores indicate number of hours of physical activity per week
Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
Stanford Patient Education Research Center- Communication With Physicians Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
Stanford Patient Education Research Center has different measures of health related behaviors. communication with physicians is one of the subscales. Scores range 1-15 and higher score indicates more preparation for visits and greater ability to ask questions
Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
Stanford Patient Education Research Center- Visits to Physician and Emergency Department in the Past Six Months Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
Stanford Patient Education Research Center has different measures of health related behaviors. Visits to physician and emergency department in the past six months subscale is one of the subscales.
Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Tower Test- Mean First-Move Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
This is a measure of executive function. The score reflects the average of the participant's first-move times, i.e. the time a participant took to make the first move
Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
DKEFS Tower Test- Achievement Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
This is a measure of executive function. Total achievement scores indicate the highest score participants scored on the test. The lowest score possible is 0 and the highest score possible is 30. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
DKEFS Word Fluency
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
This is a measure of executive function where participants are given a letter and asked to generate as many words as they can think of within 60 seconds
Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
DKEFS Trail Making- Condition 4: Number-letter Switching
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later
DKEFS trail making condition 4 is a measure of executive function that requires the participant to switch back and forth between connecting numbers and letters in a sequence
Baseline, Immediately post intervention (2 months) and 3 months later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Deirdre Dawson, PhD, Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REB1021

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on Real world strategy approach

3
Subscribe