Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Jumping Mechanography (Jump)

October 1, 2015 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Jumping Mechanography in Older Adults and Comparison With Current Functional Assessment Tools

Sarcopenia, the age-related decline in muscle mass and function (widely recognized as "frailty"), is increasingly being appreciated, primarily in the research environment. Interventions to prevent or treat sarcopenia can be anticipated to reduce falls, fractures and thereby to facilitate independence and improve quality of life for older adults. Unfortunately, there is no current consensus definition of sarcopenia, thereby impeding clinical recognition and treatment. It has been advocated that low appendicular (arm and leg) lean mass, as measured by DXA, be utilized as a clinical diagnostic tool to define sarcopenia. While such an approach is possible, however, muscle strength loss is more rapid than mass loss, indicating deterioration of muscle "quality." Muscle quality may be affected by changes at the neuromuscular, cellular or subcellular levels; parameters not detected by measuring mass alone. Clearly, tools evaluating muscle performance, not simply mass, are needed to optimally identify, and subsequently monitor, treatment of older adults with sarcopenia. While current tests of muscle power/function (e.g., chair-rising, self-selected gait velocity, etc.) do correlate with functional limitation in older adults, these existing tests have limitations in that they cannot be performed in all people, may have "yes/no" results rather than a continuous scale and may not be highly precise. Thus, improved muscle function assessment tools are needed, both clinically and in research venues. Jumping mechanography is very likely one such methodology.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

96

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical Center and Research Program

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Ambulatory community dwelling adults who are able to stand without assistance. Both men and women age ≥ 70 years from the Madison Wisconsin area. Specifically, participants will be enrolled using the following strata in each gender group: low vitamin D/low functional status (12 men and 12 women), normal vitamin D/low functional status (12 men and 12 women), low vitamin D/high functional status (12 men and 12 women), and normal vitamin D/high functional status (12 men and 12 women). Low vitamin D will be defined as 25(OH)D concentrations < 25 ng/ml, normal vitamin D status will be defined as 25(OH)D concentration of 30 ng/ml or greater. Functional status will be based on screening short physical performance battery (SPPB) score dichotomized at <9 vs. 9 and above.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ambulatory, community dwelling men and women age ≥ 70 years
  • Able and willing to sign informed consent
  • Able to stand without assistance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abnormalities on screening laboratory assessment deemed to be clinically significant by the study investigators
  • History of myocardial infarction within the prior six months or ongoing angina
  • History of injury or surgery within the prior six months which limits the ability to ambulate
  • History of severe end-organ disease, e.g., cardiovascular, hepatic, hematologic, pulmonary, etc., which might limit the ability to complete this study
  • History of malignancy with metastasis to the musculoskeletal system
  • Neuromuscular disease impairing balance to the degree of not being able to stand without assistance
  • BMD T-score of less than -3.5 at any measured site and a prior hip or vertebral fracture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Men
Men over 70 years old.
Women
Women over 70 years old.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Neil Binkley, MD, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 19, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 5, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcopenia

Subscribe