Comparison of Two Insertion Techniques of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway by Unskilled Personnel in Children

August 30, 2010 updated by: Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is one of the alternative methods for effective airway management. It is an advanced form of laryngeal mask airway(LMA) with a softer and larger cuff to improve sealing and a drain tube to permit venting of the stomach. However, the larger cuff is more difficult to save space for insertion in the mouth and is more likely to fold over. Particularly, a relatively large tongue, a floppy epiglottis, a cephalad and more anterior larynx and frequent presence of tonsillar hypertrophy may disturb PLMA insertion in pediatric patients. The manufacturer recommends inserting PLMA using digital manipulation or with an introducer, but these techniques have lower success rates compared to those of LMA insertion.

McIvor blade is a tongue retractor with a thin and curved blade and a flat handle. It is used to secure the operating field by pressing tongue during tonsillectomy. The investigators hypothesized that McIvor blade would provide more space in the mouth for PLMA insertion, and therefore it could improve the PLMA insertion as well as reducing injuries to the pharyngeal wall. The investigators compared the success rate and the incidence of complications of the digital technique with those of McIvor blade-guided insertion by unskilled anesthesia residents.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rapid and successful airway management is important for the patient's outcome in emergency care. Tracheal intubation with an endotracheal tube is the gold standard for airway management, but tracheal intubation by paramedical staff in pre-hospital setting can be time-consuming and difficult. The ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is one of the alternative methods for effective airway management. It is an advanced form of laryngeal mask airway(LMA) with a softer and larger cuff to improve sealing and a drain tube to permit venting of the stomach. However, the larger cuff is more difficult to save space for insertion in the mouth and is more likely to fold over. Particularly, a relatively large tongue, a floppy epiglottis, a cephalad and more anterior larynx and frequent presence of tonsillar hypertrophy may disturb PLMA insertion in pediatric patients. The manufacturer recommends inserting PLMA using digital manipulation or with an introducer, but these techniques have lower success rates compared to those of LMA insertion. The first attempt success rate of PLMA insertion by inexperienced personnel was reported to be 83%. Several techniques have been introduced to improve the insertion success rate; the use of fiberoscopy, gum-elastic bougie, and a suction catheter. However, all of them can not save enough oral space for PLMA insertion and it would not be easy for the unskilled personnel to use them in emergency situations. A larger space between tongue and retropharynx, not being accompanied with an index finger for insertion would make make it easier for the unskilled personnel to insert the PLMA.

McIvor blade is a tongue retractor with a thin and curved blade and a flat handle. It is used to secure the operating field by pressing tongue during tonsillectomy. We hypothesized that McIvor blade would provide more space in the mouth for PLMA insertion, and therefore it could improve the PLMA insertion as well as reducing injuries to the pharyngeal wall. We compared the success rate and the incidence of complications of the digital technique with those of McIvor blade-guided insertion by unskilled anesthesia residents.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

134

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 463-707
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jin-Young Hwang, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 9 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy pediatric patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pediatric patients with a known or predicted difficult airway, recent sore throat, mouth opening less than 2.5 cm, or at risk of aspiration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: McIvor group
groups in which proseal laryngeal mask airway is inserted with McIvor retractor.
The Mclvor blade- guided technique (McIvor group) involved the following steps. The PLMA was lubricated on the posterior aspect of the deflated mask with a water-based lubricant. The McIvor blade was fully inserted beneath the tongue of the patients. The tongue was lifted gently with the McIvor blade and PLMA was introduced into a space between the McIvor blade and maxillary incisors holding the bite block of the PLMA. The PLMA was advanced into the hypopharynx until definite resistance was felt and McIvor blade was removed.
Other Names:
  • McIvor group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the success rate of proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) insertion
Time Frame: at the time of insertion of PLMA
immediately after the insertion of PLMA
at the time of insertion of PLMA

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the incidence of complications following PLMA insertion
Time Frame: after the removal of PLMA, and 1 day after surgery
blood staining: after the removal of PLMA; sore throat: 1 day after surgery
after the removal of PLMA, and 1 day after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jin-Young Hwang, MD, Fellow

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 31, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 31, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2010

Last Verified

July 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • B1006/104-004

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Airway Management

Clinical Trials on McIvor retractor

Subscribe