Alexis Retractor in Total Hip Arthroplasty

February 3, 2026 updated by: Victor Hugo Hernandez, University of Miami

Wound Healing Outcomes With and Without the Alexis Wound Retractor in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

To determine if there is a difference in wound healing and surgical site infection (SSI) rates using the Alexis wound retractor vs. not using it in longitudinal direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

202

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33125
        • University of Miami
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing primary unilateral longitudinal direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty
  • Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with history of prior open surgery on the affected hip
  • Patients with history of prior total hip arthroplasty on the contralateral hip
  • Patients with allergies or absolute contraindication to standardized drugs administered within the University of Miami protocol for total hip replacement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Alexis Retractor
Subjects in this arm will undergo surgery using the Alexis wound retractor.
A surgical device used to retract tissue during procedures, designed to reduce wound trauma and improve healing
Active Comparator: Non-Alexis Retractor
Subjects in this arm will undergo surgery using a standard retractor that does not include the Alexis device.
A conventional surgical retractor used during procedures without the features of the Alexis device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Days to Identification of Delayed Wound Healing
Time Frame: Up to 14 days
Delayed wound healing is defined as the presence of one or more of the following clinical signs: drainage from wound, wound dehiscence, and superficial surgical site infection. Assessment is performed by clinical examination and documentation in the postoperative period. The outcome is measured in number of days from surgery to identification of delayed healing
Up to 14 days
Patient satisfaction with scaring as measured by Patient Scar Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Using the Patient Scar Assessment Scale, which is a validated plastic surgery tool for evaluating scars from the patient's perspective. Measured with a scale from 0 to 10, higher score indicates less satisfaction.
Up to 12 months
Scar cosmesis as measured by Observer Scar Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Using the Observer Scar Assessment Scale, which is a validated plastic surgery tool for evaluating scars from the observer perspective. Measured with a scale from 0 to 10, higher score indicates worse scar cosmesis.
Up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Reporting Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) Symptoms
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
LFCN symptoms are defined as paresthesias or dysesthesias in the anterior thigh distal to the surgical site. Symptoms are assessed through participant self-report and clinical documentation.
Up to 6 months
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) - Patient-Reported Outcome
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Assessed using the HOOS, a validated instrument for evaluating hip-related disability and osteoarthritis symptoms from the patient's perspective. Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating worse patient-reported outcomes.
Up to 12 months
Number of Intraoperative fractures
Time Frame: Up to 3 hours (duration of surgery)
Intraoperative complications will be assessed by counting the number of fractures occurring during the surgical procedure; fractures are identified by the operating surgeon and confirmed via intraoperative imaging or direct visualization.
Up to 3 hours (duration of surgery)
Length of surgery
Time Frame: Up to 3 hours
Duration of the surgical procedure measured in minutes, from initial incision to closure.
Up to 3 hours
Number of Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Measured by the number of complications including, but not limited to, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), prosthetic hip dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, implant failure requiring revision surgery. Events are identified through clinical evaluation and documentation.
Up to 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Victor H Hernandez, MD, MSc, University of Miami Department of Orthopaedics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20251013

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Alexis wound retractor

Subscribe