Videolaryngoscopic Difficult ıntubation and Glottic View Score: A Multicentre Prospective Study (VIDIGLOV)

February 3, 2026 updated by: DILEK YAZICIOGLU, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Prediction of Difficult Videolaryngoscopic Intubation and Development of a Dedicated Glottic View Score: A Multicentre Prospective Study

Background:

Videolaryngoscopy has improved glottic visualization and facilitated tracheal intubation. However, difficulties-including failed intubation-still occur. At present, no prospectively derived classification system exists to assess the difficulty of videolaryngoscopic (VL) intubation across both normal and anticipated difficult airways. Additionally, current glottic view grading systems, designed for direct laryngoscopy, may not adequately capture the specific challenges of VL intubation.

Objectives:

This study aims to:

  1. Develop a predictive model for difficult VL intubation in surgical patients with both normal and anticipated difficult airways.
  2. Create a glottic view scoring system specifically tailored to videolaryngoscopy.
  3. Compare the predictive accuracy of the new scoring system with existing laryngeal view grades in forecasting difficult VL intubation.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background:

Videolaryngoscopy has improved glottic visualization and facilitated tracheal intubation. However, difficulties-including failed intubation-still occur. At present, no prospectively derived classification system exists to assess the difficulty of videolaryngoscopic (VL) intubation across both normal and anticipated difficult airways. Additionally, current glottic view grading systems, designed for direct laryngoscopy, may not adequately capture the specific challenges of VL intubation.

Objectives:

This study aims to:

  1. Develop a predictive model for difficult VL intubation in surgical patients with both normal and anticipated difficult airways.
  2. Create a glottic view scoring system specifically tailored to videolaryngoscopy.
  3. Compare the predictive accuracy of the new scoring system with existing laryngeal view grades in forecasting difficult VL intubation.

Methods:

A prospective cohort of 4,977 patients will be enrolled. Patient and intubation related variables-including VL findings, airway features, clinical parameters, device, and procedural details-will be analyzed. Binary logistic regression will be employed to build the initial predictive model. In parallel, machine learning techniques (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, XGBoost, LightGBM, etc.) will be applied to evaluate predictive performance. Comparative analysis will be conducted between the machine learning models and the logistic regression baseline.

Expected Impact:

The development of a robust predictive tool and an associated VL-specific glottic view score could enhance clinical decision making, particularly in identifying patients at risk of difficult or failed VL intubation. This may support early consideration of awake tracheal intubation, and use of standardized terminology and reduce complications associated with difficult airway management

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

4977

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye), 06170
        • Etlik City Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Akdeniz University Medical Faculty

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults, both with normal or predicted difficult airways, undergoing orotracheal intubation with a videolarygoscope, for a case mix of surgeries

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults
  • Both with normal or predicted difficult airways
  • Undergoing orotracheal intubation with a videolarygoscope

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rapid sequence intubation
  • Double lumen tube intubation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glottic view description
Time Frame: 2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Vocal cords are fully visible Vocal cords are partially separately Vocal cords are not visible Cords are adducted Epiglottis is visible Epiglottis is large Epiglottis is small Epiglottis is edematous Epiglottis mass is present Arytenoids are visible Arytenoid luxation or subluxation Arytenoid edema Valecula problem (edema, Coffee grounds, etc., unable to insert a blade) Aryepiglottic plica pathology (edema, Coffee grounds scar) Laryngeal structures should be formed Glottic stenosis Laryngospasm
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Failed first intubation attempt
Time Frame: 2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Failed to intubate at firtst attempt
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Difficult intubation
Time Frame: 2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Failed to intubate at 1-2 attempts and/or intubation duration longer than 120 second
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Failed intubation
Time Frame: 2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Not able to intubate the patient
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Intubation duration
Time Frame: 2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Time elapsed from entring the blade between the teeth to detecting an entidal carbondioxide trace
2 minutes after anesthesia induction

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentil of glottic opening score
Time Frame: 2 minutes after anesthesia induction
the percentage of glottic opening seen, defined by the linear span from the anterior commissure to the inter-arytenoid notch
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Cormack lehanne score
Time Frame: 2 minutes after anesthesia induction
grade 1 being a full view of the glottis, grade 2 being a partial view, grade 3 being only a view of the epiglottis, and grade 4 being an absent view of the glottis and epiglottis
2 minutes after anesthesia induction

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dilek Yazıcıoğlu Ünal, professor, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Etlik City Hospital

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Airway Management

Subscribe