Telmisartan Versus Losartan in Kidney Transplantation (COSTANT)

A Prospective, Randomized, Open Label Blinded End Point (Probe), Crossover Study to Compare the Effects of Telmisartan and Losartan on Metabolic Profile of Renal Transplant Patients

In renal transplant recipients, residual renal insufficiency combined to the effects of immunosuppressive therapy with steroids or calcineurin inhibitors may reduce insulin activity and may contribute to several of the abnormalities associated with the metabolic syndrome, such as hypertension, glucose intolerance and hyperlipidemia. In turn, insulin resistance, hypertension, hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia may importantly contribute to the excess cardiovascular risk of renal transplant patients (an excess comparable to that of diabetes subjects with over diabetic nephropathy)and may also accelerate progressive renal function deterioration and promote graft loss. Thus, amelioration of the insulin activity and of the related metabolic syndrome is a key component of treatments aimed to improve patient and graft survival in renal transplant recipients. Recently, drugs such as peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-gamma activators, that ameliorate insulin sensitivity and metabolic syndrome, have become available.These agents, however, can provoke fluid retention, weight gain, edema and, in some cases, heart failure.

Recent studies showed that telmisartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, in addition to block the angiotensin II type 1 - a key surface receptor involved in the regulation of blood pressure - may also activate peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-gamma activators, thus improving some of the features of the metabolic syndrome. Thus telmisartan may substantially reduce the overall cardiovascular and renal risk of renal transplant recipients by ameliorating some of the modifiable components of the metabolic syndrome. On the other hand, telmisartan is devoid of the adverse effects of peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-gamma activators such as fluid retention, and has therefore a remarkably better risk/benefit profile. Thus, whether telmisartan in addition to the beneficial effects of a reference angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist (such as losartan) may offer adjunctive advantages related to improved insulin sensitivity in renal transplant patients on chronic therapy with steroids and/or calcineurin inhibitors, is worth investigating.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND In renal transplant recipients, residual renal insufficiency combined to the effects of immunosuppressive therapy with steroids or calcineurin inhibitors may reduce insulin activity and may contribute to several of the abnormalities associated with the metabolic syndrome, such as hypertension, glucose intolerance and hyperlipidemia. In turn, insulin resistance, hypertension, hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia may importantly contribute to the excess cardiovascular risk of renal transplant patients (an excess comparable to that of diabetes subjects with over diabetic nephropathy)and may also accelerate progressive renal function deterioration and promote graft loss. Thus, amelioration of the insulin activity and of the related metabolic syndrome is a key component of treatments aimed to improve patient and graft survival in renal transplant recipients. Recently, drugs such as peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-gamma activators, that ameliorate insulin sensitivity and metabolic syndrome, have become available. These agents, however, can provoke fluid retention, weight gain, edema and, in some cases, heart failure. Thus, the risk/benefit profile of peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-gamma activators is still uncertain, in particular in renal transplant patients where the risks of therapy may overwhelm the potential benefits.

Recent studies showed that telmisartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, in addition to block the angiotensin II type 1 - a key surface receptor involved in the regulation of blood pressure - may also activate PPAR-gamma, thus improving some of the features of the metabolic syndrome, such as hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia in people with hypertension and/or diabetes. Thus, in addition to control high blood pressure and to limit some of the adverse effects of angiotensin II, including target organ damage, graft fibrosis and cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity, telmisartan may also substantially reduce the overall cardiovascular and renal risk of renal transplant recipients by ameliorating some of the modifiable components of the metabolic syndrome, such as hypertension, glucose intolerance and hyperlipidemia. On the other hand, telmisartan is devoid of the adverse effects of peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-gamma activators such as fluid retention, and has therefore a remarkably better risk/benefit profile. Thus, whether telmisartan in addition to the beneficial effects of a reference AII receptor antagonist (such as losartan) may offer adjunctive advantages related to improved insulin sensitivity in renal transplant patients on chronic therapy with steroids and/or calcineurin inhibitors, is worth investigating.

AIMS The primary aim is to compare the short-term effects of telmisartan and losartan on insulin sensitivity in kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function and concomitant treatment with steroids and/or calcineurin inhibitors.

DESIGN This will be a pilot, explorative study. On the basis of previous experimental evidence, a crossover study on 20 patients should have the power to detect a statistically significant difference in the effect on insulin activity between each treatment period as compared to baseline.

Patients will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to the sequence Telmisartan-Losartan or to sequence losartan-telmisartan.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bergamo
      • Ranica, Bergamo, Italy, 24020
        • Mario Negri Institute - Clinical Research Center for Rare Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent;
  • Age > 18 years;
  • Single renal transplant or dual marginal > 6 months duration;
  • Blood pressure >130/85 mmHg or need for anti-hypertensive therapy;
  • Stable renal function (changes in serum creatinine < 30%) and no acute rejection episodes in the last six months;
  • Stable (for at least six months) dual or triple immunosuppressive therapy including corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors;
  • Legal capacity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vascular disease of the kidney;
  • Heart failure: NYHA classification class III-IV on ACE or AII inhibitor therapy;
  • Cerebral haemorrhage, stroke or TIA within three months prior to study enrolment;
  • Myocardial infarction within three months prior to study enrolment;
  • Unstable angina pectoris;
  • Severe hepatic disease;
  • Pregnancy or women of child-bearing potential without following a scientifically accepted form of contraception;
  • Overt diabetes or concomitant treatment with oral antidiabetic agents and/or insulin;
  • Specific clinical indication (other than arterial hypertension) to be treated with ACE inhibitors or AII receptor antagonists;
  • Specific contraindications or history of hypersensitivity to the study drugs, glitazones, ACE inhibitors or AII receptor antagonists;
  • Participation to other clinical trials over the last three months;
  • Legal incapacity;
  • Previous diagnosis of: intellectual disability/mental retardation, dementia, schizophrenia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Telmisartan
One week 40 mg daily, followed by fifteen weeks treatment period with 80 mg daily.
Experimental: Losartan
One week 50 mg daily, followed by fifteen weeks treatment period with 100 mg daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Insulin sensitivity.
Time Frame: At baseline and then every four months.
Glucose disposal rate as assessed by an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp.
At baseline and then every four months.
Insulin sensitivity.
Time Frame: At 9 month.
Glucose disposal rate as assessed by an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp.
At 9 month.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Systemic variables.
Time Frame: At baseline and then every four months.
Sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure, 24-h blood pressure profile.
At baseline and then every four months.
Systemic variables.
Time Frame: At 9 month.
Sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure, 24-h blood pressure profile.
At 9 month.
Metabolic variables.
Time Frame: At baseline and then every four months.
Morning fasting blood glucose, Glucose tolerance test, Glicated hemoglobin, Morning fasting insulin, HOMA index, Lipid profile (total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, apolipoprotein A, B.
At baseline and then every four months.
Metabolic variables.
Time Frame: At 9 month.
Morning fasting blood glucose, Glucose tolerance test, Glicated hemoglobin, Morning fasting insulin, HOMA index, Lipid profile (total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, apolipoprotein A, B.
At 9 month.
Renal variables.
Time Frame: At baseline and then every four months.
UAE (as assessed by nephelometry in three consecutive overnight urine collections), GFR/RPF (as assessed by Iohexol and PAH plasma clearance, respectively), Albumin fractional clearance.
At baseline and then every four months.
Renal variables.
Time Frame: At 9 month.
UAE (as assessed by nephelometry in three consecutive overnight urine collections), GFR/RPF (as assessed by Iohexol and PAH plasma clearance, respectively), Albumin fractional clearance.
At 9 month.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

October 20, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Transplant

Clinical Trials on Telmisartan

3
Subscribe