Milnacipran for Treatment of Pain in Older Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis

February 27, 2018 updated by: Helen Lavretsky, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

An Open-label Trial of Milnacipran for the Treatment of Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in Older Adults

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of milnacipran for the treatment of pain in rheumatoid arthritis in older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a 12-week open-label trial of milnacipran for the treatment of pain in rheumatoid arthritis in older adults. The investigators are interested in the relationship of chronic pain to inflammation, resilience, fatigue, and physical and mental functioning. The investigators anticipate that effective pain reduction will result in improved fatigue, resilience, physical and mental functioning and reduced levels of inflammation. The investigators are seeking to examine this directly in 30 older adults (55 years of age or older) with rheumatoid arthritis who will be using milnacipran for treatment of pain in the absence of clinical major depression. This proposed trial will serve as a pilot study to estimate the effect of the drug on pain and functional outcomes, as well as aid in dose-finding in this population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Semel Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis. RA subjects will be evaluated by a board certified rheumatologist using revised criteria established by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). This requires at least four of the following seven criteria: 1) morning joint stiffness; 2) arthritis in 3 or more joint areas; 3) arthritis of hand joints; 4) symmetric arthritis; 5) rheumatoid nodules; 6) presence of serum rheumatoid factor and 7) changes on posteroanterior hand and wrist radiographs. In addition, criteria 1-4 must be present for at least four weeks. Individuals diagnosed with juvenile RA will be excluded.

Inclusion Criteria: Medication Use for RA patients. RA subjects taking disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) must be on a stable regime for one month before study and stable throughout study. RA subjects using DMARDs will be categorized as follows: 1) no DMARDs; 2) DMARD monotherapy with sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, minocycline, or azothioprine, 3) DMARD monotherapy with methotrexate or leflunomide, 4) biologic therapy with or without concomitant DMARDs.

Exclusion Criteria: Medical conditions. Subjects will not be eligible for the study based on the following criteria: (1) presence of acute or uncontrolled co-morbid medical conditions not limited to but including cardiovascular (e.g., history of acute coronary event, stroke, uncontrolled HTN) and neurological diseases (e.g., Parkinson's disease), as well as pain disorders; (2) presence of co-morbid inflammatory disorders such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis and other autoimmune disorders; (3) presence of an uncontrolled medical condition that is deemed by the investigators to interfere with the proposed study procedures, or put the study participant at undue risk; (4) presence of chronic infections (e.g. positive purified protein derivative (PPD) test)) due to contraindication of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist use in these individuals and also because chronic infection can produce elevations in proinflammatory cytokines; (5) presence of an acute infectious illness in the two weeks prior to an experimental session; (6) pregnancy or breast-feeding because of the effects on neuroendocrine systems and sleep; (7) in women, the presence of vasomotor symptoms due to the effects of such symptoms on measures of sleep; (8) use of hormone containing medications including steroids; (9) current and/or regular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) medications.

Exclusion Criteria: Psychiatric Disorders. RA subjects with a current or lifetime history of a major Depressive Disorder or other Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM-IV) psychiatric disorder (e.g. substance dependence) will be excluded due to the known effects of major depression on pain. Although depressive symptoms can occur in as many as 40% of RA patients, the prevalence of syndromal major depressive disorder is considerably less, and we do not anticipate that exclusion of current or lifetime history of major depressive disorder will substantially alter subject flow. More than 75% of a selected sample of RA subjects at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) affiliated clinics does not have a history of co-morbid psychiatric disorder.

Exclusion Criteria: Medication use. Subjects who have used the following medications in the past two months will be excluded from the study: (1) previous use of Nitrogen Mustard, Cyclosporin, Cytotoxin, or Cyclophosphamide; (2) regular use of analgesics such as opioids, (3) regular use of prednisone >10mg of prednisone, (4) psychotropic medications, including selective serotonergic reuptake inhibitors, antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics, sedatives and barbiturates. We will also exclude current smokers because of the known effects of tobacco use on proinflammatory cytokine levels. (Helen, I would suggest to remove this sentence. It is clear from studies that patients are higher risk for susceptibility and increased disease activity with smoking. It may decrease our enrollment.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Milnacipran, active drug, open-label
All subjects will be free of antidepressant medications or opiates, or any other medications used to treat pain for at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of dose titration. Patients will be allowed to escalate up to 100 mg a day, or to their maximum tolerated dose in the course of the first week. The stable-dose phase will be a 10-week period during which patients will take medications at the final dose achieved (either 100 mg per day in divided doses, or the maximum tolerated dose of less than 100 mg per day). Final efficacy assessments will be made at the termination visit, and the study medication will be tapered down following 12 weeks of drug treatment.
All subjects will be free of antidepressant medications or opiates, or any other medications used to treat pain for at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of dose titration. Patients will be allowed to escalate up to 100 mg a day: Day 1: 12.5 mg once a day; Days 2-3: 25 mg/day (12.5 mg twice daily); Days 4-7: 50 mg/day (25 mg twice daily); After Day 7: 100 mg/day (50 mg twice daily). The stable-dose phase will be a 10-week period during which patients will take medications at the final dose achieved (either 100 mg per day in divided doses, or the maximum tolerated dose of less than 100 mg per day).
Other Names:
  • Savella

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Rating Index
Time Frame: Change score at baseline and 12 weeks
The Pain Rating Index ranked values associated with adjectives depicting the severity of pain from the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). The assessment is comprised of 15 adjectives, each of which is scored on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and summed to arrive at a score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 45 (worst possible pain), to measure the extent of pain/tenderness and swelling. The Pain Rating Index final scores were averaged to indicate an overall report of joint pain and stiffness.
Change score at baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale to Evaluate Fatigue (VAS-F)
Time Frame: Change scores from Week 1 to Week 12 of energy and fatigue
The Visual Analogue Scale to Evaluate Fatigue (VAS-F) is an assessment of fatigue severity. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures a characteristic or attitude that ranges across a continuum of values from none (0) to an extreme amount of fatigue and energy (10). Scores fall between 0 and 10 anchored by word descriptors at each end and the patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. The scale consists of 18 items relating to the subjective experience of fatigue. Two subscales are summed separately and reported as follows: Items 1-5 and 11-18 represent fatigue from none (0) to extreme fatigue (10) and items 6-10 represent energy from none (0) to extreme energy (10). The outcome measures the change scores of energy and fatigue from Week 1 to Week 12. The VAS subscales for Fatigue Scale range: 0-130 and Energy Scale range: 0-50 with higher scores indicating greater energy and fatigue.
Change scores from Week 1 to Week 12 of energy and fatigue
(UKU) Side Effects Rating Scale Profile
Time Frame: Weeks 1-4, 6, 8, 10, 12
The UKU assessment will rate the number of participants with emerging adverse events.
Weeks 1-4, 6, 8, 10, 12
Profile of Mood States (POMS)
Time Frame: Week 1 and 12
Depressive symptoms: Repeated assessment of depressive symptoms severity will be made using the Profile of Mood States (POMS). The scale consisted of 65 adjectives rated on 5-point scale 0= not at all; 1=a little; 2=moderately; 3=quite a bit; 4=extremely. Five subscales were included in analysis: tension-anxiety (9 items, score range: 0-36), depression (15 items, range 0-60), friendliness (12 items, range 0-48), vigor-activity (8 items, range 0-32), and fatigue (7 items, range 0-28). Higher vigor-activity and friendliness scores reflect a good mood or emotion (high scores indicating better outcomes), and low scores in the other subscales (tension, depression, and fatigue) reflect a good mood or emotion (low scores indicating better outcomes).
Week 1 and 12
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Time Frame: Change Scores from Week 1 to Week 12
Resilience: the Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) quantifies stress coping ability. The CD-RISC is a 25-item self-administered scale, although where necessary, a staff professional could read out each question to the subject and record the answer. The subject is directed to respond to each question with reference to the previous month, understanding that if a particular situation has not arisen in this time, then the response should be determined by how the person thinks they would have reacted. Scoring of the full 25 item scale is based on summing the total of each item, which is scored from 0-4. The full range is therefore from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater resilience. The outcome measure is a change score from Week 1 to Week 12.
Change Scores from Week 1 to Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Helen Lavretsky, M.D., University of California, Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

October 21, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Milnacipran

3
Subscribe