Effect of Age and Prior Immunity to Response to Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in Children

November 10, 2016 updated by: John Treanor, University of Rochester

Evaluation of the Effect of Age and Prior Immunity on the Response to Live or Inactivated Seasonal (A/California/7/2009-like, A/Perth/16/2009-like, and B/Brisbane/60/2008-like (B/Victoria Lineage) Influenza Vaccines in Children

A total of 88 children between 2 and 9 years of age will be randomized to receive a two dose schedule of either licensed live attenuated trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine (LAIV) or licensed inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine (TIV)or TIV followed by LAIV or LAIV followed by TIV separated by 28 days. Children with a laboratory documented history of prior H1N1 infection will be excluded.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study will be conducted as a randomized, prospective, open-label evaluation of the clinical tolerability, vaccine virus shedding, and serum and mucosal antibody response to vaccination with either live trivalent influenza vaccine (LAIV) or trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) in healthy children between the ages of 2 and 9 years. Children will be screened for antibody to A/Brisbane/57/07 (H1N1) and A/California/07/09 (H1N1), A/Perth/16/2009 (H3N2) and B/Brisbane/60/2008 before and at indicated times after the start of the study. They will not be randomized based on antibody levels. Children with prior documented infection with the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus will be excluded. Vaccine will be administered on days 0 and 28.

Safety of vaccination will be assessed using symptoms collected by parents for 7 days after each dose of vaccine. Serum will be obtained prior to and on day 28 following each dose of vaccine and assessed for antibody by HAI, ELISA, and neutralization techniques. Nasal secretions will be obtained by nasal wick prior to and on day 28 after each dose and assessed for HA-specific IgA (immune globulin A) and IgG (immune globulin G)antibody by ELISA. Nasal swabs will be obtained on days 2, 4, and 7 after each dose of live vaccine and assessed for the presence and magnitude of vaccine virus shedding of the live attenuated vaccine by rtRT-PCR (real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction)and TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious doses)on MDCK(Madin Darby Canine Kidney) cells.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • Vaccine Research Unit Room 3-5000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 9 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 2 and 9 years, inclusive.
  • No prior history of laboratory documented infection with novel H1N1 virus
  • The subject must be in good health, as determined by: vital signs (heart rate <140 bpm; blood pressure: systolic ≥ 90 mm Hg and ≤140 mm Hg; diastolic ≤ 90 mm Hg; oral temperature <100.0ºF (fahrenheit); medical history; and targeted physical examination, when necessary, based on medical history. Stable medical condition is defined as: no recent increase in prescription medication, dose, or frequency of medication in the last 3 months and health outcomes of the specific disease are considered to be within acceptable limits in the last 6 months.
  • The subject/parents are able to understand and comply with the planned study procedures, including being available for all study visits.
  • The subject/parents have provided informed consent prior to any study procedures. (An assent will be obtained for all children as required by the institutional IRB (Institutional Review Board.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a laboratory documented history of previous novel H1N1 infection.
  • History of egg allergy or allergy to other components of vaccine.
  • History of wheezing.
  • The subject is immunosuppressed as a result of an underlying illness or treatment with immunosuppressive or cytotoxic drugs, or use of anticancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
  • The subject has an active neoplastic disease.
  • The subject has long-term (greater than 2 weeks) use of oral or parenteral steroids, or high-dose inhaled steroids (>800 mg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent) within the preceding 6 months (nasal and topical steroids are allowed).
  • The subject received immunoglobulin or another blood product within the 3 months prior to enrollment in this study.
  • The subject has received an inactivated vaccine within the 2 weeks or a live vaccine within the 4 weeks prior to enrollment in this study or plans to receive another vaccine within the next 28 days (or 56 days for vaccine naïve recipients).
  • The subject has an acute or chronic medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would render vaccination unsafe or would interfere with the evaluation of responses. These conditions include chronic conditions recognized as risk factors for influenza complications or as contraindications for live vaccination, including chronic cardiac (exclusive of hypertension) or pulmonary conditions (including asthma), diabetes mellitus, or renal impairment.
  • The subject has an acute illness or an oral temperature greater than 99.9 degreesF (37.7 degrees C) within 3 days prior to enrollment or vaccination. Subjects who had an acute illness that was treated symptoms resolved are eligible to enroll as long as treatment is completed and symptoms resolve > 3 days prior to enrollment.
  • The subject is currently participating or plans to participate in a study that involves an experimental agent (vaccine, drug, biologic, device, blood product, or medication) or has received an experimental agent within 1 month prior to enrollment in this study, or expects to receive another experimental agent during participation in this study, or intends to donate blood during the study period.
  • The subject has any condition that would, in the opinion of the site investigator, place the subject at an unacceptable risk of injury or render the subject unable to meet the requirements of the protocol.
  • The subject has a known human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection.
  • The subject has a previous history of Guillain-Barré syndrome within 6 weeks of receipt of influenza vaccination.
  • The subject has any condition that the principal investigator (PI) believes may interfere with successful completion of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Live Attenuated Influenza vaccine
LAIV 0.2 ml will be given intranasally followed by LAIV 0.2 mg given intranasally 28 days later
Biological: Live attenuated Influenza vaccine
0.2 mL dose delivered through nasal spray, 0.1 ml in each nostril, 2 doses separated by 28 days
Other Names:
  • FluMist
Active Comparator: Trivalent Influenza Vaccine 2010-2011
TIV will be given in a dose of .25mg 2 years to 36 months of age or .5 ml ages 37 months to 8 years intramuscularly followed by a second dose of .25mg 2 years to 36 months of age or .5 ml ages 37 months to 9 years intramuscularly 28 days later
Biological: Trivalent Influenza Vaccine
.25 mL given intramuscularly to children 24 to 36 months of age, 2 doses given 28 days apart, .5 mL given intramuscularly to children 37 months to 9 years of age, 2 doses given 28 day s apart.
Other Names:
  • Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
Active Comparator: TIV followed by LAIV
TIV will be given in a dose of .25mg 2 years to 36 months of age or .5 ml ages 37 months to 9 years intramuscularly followed by LAIV given in a dose of .2 ml intranasally 28 days later
Biological: TIV followed by LAIV
TIV .25 mL given intramuscularly to children 24 to 36 months of age or .5 mL given intramuscularly to children 37 months to 9 years of age, followed by FluMist 0.2 mL delivered by nasal spray (.1 mL in each nostril)28 days later
Other Names:
  • Seasonal Influenza Vaccines
Active Comparator: LAIV followed by TIV
LAIV will be given in a dose of .2 ml intranasally followed by a dose of TIV given in a dose of .25 ml 2 years to 36 months or .5 ml 37 months to 9 years intramuscularly 28 days later
Biological: LAIV followed by TIV
LAIV .2 mL given through nasal spray (.1 mL in each nostril) Followed by TIV .25 mL given intramuscularly to children 24 to 25 months of age or .5 mL given intramuscularly to children 36 months to 9 years of age 28 days later
Other Names:
  • Seasonal Influenza Vaccines

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects Shedding Vaccine Virus of Each Subtype by PCR
Time Frame: baseline to day 7
Nasal washes were collected on days 2, 4 and 7 after vaccination. Nasal swab specimens were tested for the presence of vaccine viruses by quantitative viral culture in MDCK cells at 33º C and by real-time quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) amplification. The limit of detection of vaccine viruses was 10^0.6 tissue culture infectious doses (50%)/ml for virus culture and 10^0.4 tissue culture infectious doses (50%)/ml for qRT-PCR.
baseline to day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Peak H1N1 Virus Titer, Dose 1
Time Frame: days 2, 4 and 7
After the first dose of vaccine, the virus titer from nasal secretions was measured in tissue culture on days 2, 4 and 7 and the highest titer from one of those three time points was reported.
days 2, 4 and 7
Mean Peak H3N2 Virus Titer, Dose 1
Time Frame: days 2, 4 and 7
After the first dose of vaccine, the virus titer from nasal secretions was measured in tissue culture on days 2, 4 and 7 and the highest titer from one of those three time points was reported.
days 2, 4 and 7
Mean Peak Influenza B Virus Titer, Dose 1
Time Frame: days 2, 4 and 7
After the first dose of vaccine, the virus titer from nasal secretions was measured in tissue culture on days 2, 4 and 7 and the highest titer from one of those three time points was reported.
days 2, 4 and 7
Mean Peak H1N1 Virus Titer, Dose 2
Time Frame: days 2, 4 and 7
After the second dose of vaccine, the virus titer from nasal secretions was measured in tissue culture on days 2, 4 and 7 and the highest titer from one of those three time points was reported.
days 2, 4 and 7
Mean Peak H3N2 Virus Titer, Dose 2
Time Frame: days 2, 4 and 7
After the second dose of vaccine, the virus titer from nasal secretions was measured in tissue culture on days 2, 4 and 7 and the highest titer from one of those three time points was reported.
days 2, 4 and 7
Mean Peak Influenza B Virus Titer, Dose 2
Time Frame: days 2, 4 and 7
After the second dose of vaccine, the virus titer from nasal secretions was measured in tissue culture on days 2, 4 and 7 and the highest titer from one of those three time points was reported.
days 2, 4 and 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University of Rochester

Collaborators

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John J. Treanor, M.D., University of Rochester

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 24, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 29, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • URMC10-005/Dartmouth 22164

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe