Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Fostamatinib Monotherapy Compared With Adalimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (OSKIRA -4)

April 3, 2014 updated by: AstraZeneca

(OSKIRA-4): A Phase IIB, Multi-Centre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Fostamatinib Disodium Monotherapy Compared With Adalimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the improvements in signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for fostamatinib compared to placebo or adalimumab in patients who are Disease-Modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) naïve, DMARD intolerant or have had an inadequate response to DMARDs. The study will last for approximately six months

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sub-study:

Full title: Optional Genetic Research

Date: 10 September 2010

Version: 1

Objectives: To collect and store, with appropriate consent , DNA samples for future exploratory research into genes/genetic variation that may influence response (ie, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion, safety, tolerability and efficacy) to fostamatinib disodium and/or adalimumab; and/or susceptibility to, progression of and prognosis of RA

The main study recruitment is complete, and sub study recruitment will continue until the target is reached, estimated to be June 2013

Sub-study:

Full title: (Sub-study to OSKIRA-4): A Phase IIB, Multi-Centre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Fostamatinib Disodium Monotherapy Compared with Placebo or Adalimumab Monotherapy in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sub-Study

Date: 21 March 2011

Version: 1

Primary objective: Assess the efficacy of fostamatinib in reducing joint synovial disease activity as measured by:

  • Change from baseline to Week 6 (versus placebo) in OMERACT RAMRIS synovitis score.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

644

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Pleven, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Ruse, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Sevlievo, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
    • Ontario
      • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
        • Research Site
      • Brno, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Bruntal, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Hlucin, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Liberec, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Ostrava, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Ostrava - Poruba, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Ostrava - Trebovice, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Praha, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Praha 11, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Praha 2, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Praha 4, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Zlin, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Dresden, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Muenchen, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Balatonfured, Hungary
        • Research Site
      • Balatonfüred, Hungary
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • Research Site
      • Debrecen, Hungary
        • Research Site
      • Zalaegerszeg, Hungary
        • Research Site
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Research Site
      • Bytom, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Chelm Slaski, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Sroda Wielkopolska, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Wroclaw, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Zyrardow, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Łódź, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Petrozavodsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Ryazan, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Voronezh, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Trebisov, Slovakia
        • Research Site
      • Trnava, Slovakia
        • Research Site
      • Cape Town, South Africa
        • Research Site
      • Durban, South Africa
        • Research Site
      • Pretoria, South Africa
        • Research Site
      • Stellenbosch, South Africa
        • Research Site
    • Gauteng
      • Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
        • Research Site
    • Kwazulu Natal
      • Durban, Kwazulu Natal, South Africa
        • Research Site
    • Western Cape
      • Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
        • Research Site
      • Donetsk, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Ivano-frankivsk, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Kharkiv, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Kyiv, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Lutsk, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Lviv, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Odessa, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Simferopol, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Zaporyzhzhya, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Basingstoke, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
      • Eastbourne, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
      • Manchester, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
      • Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
    • Berkshire
      • Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
    • Greater London
      • London, Greater London, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
    • Sussex
      • Eastbourne, Sussex, United Kingdom
        • Research Site
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
        • Research Site
    • Arizona
      • Glendale, Arizona, United States
        • Research Site
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States
        • Research Site
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
        • Research Site
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
        • Research Site
    • California
      • Huntington Beach, California, United States
        • Research Site
      • Long Beach, California, United States
        • Research Site
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
        • Research Site
    • Connecticut
      • Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
        • Research Site
    • Florida
      • Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
        • Research Site
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States
        • Research Site
      • Miami, Florida, United States
        • Research Site
      • Ocala, Florida, United States
        • Research Site
      • Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
        • Research Site
      • Pinellas Park, Florida, United States
        • Research Site
      • Venice, Florida, United States
        • Research Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
        • Research Site
    • Indiana
      • South Bend, Indiana, United States
        • Research Site
    • Kentucky
      • Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States
        • Research Site
      • Elizabethtown, Kentucky, United States
        • Research Site
    • Maryland
      • Oxon Hill, Maryland, United States
        • Research Site
    • Michigan
      • Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
        • Research Site
    • Missouri
      • Richmond Heights, Missouri, United States
        • Research Site
    • Montana
      • Kalispell, Montana, United States
        • Research Site
    • New Hampshire
      • Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
        • Research Site
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
        • Research Site
      • Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States
        • Research Site
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States
        • Research Site
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
        • Research Site
    • Ohio
      • Perrysburg, Ohio, United States
        • Research Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
        • Research Site
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States
        • Research Site
    • Tennessee
      • Jackson, Tennessee, United States
        • Research Site
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
        • Research Site
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States
        • Research Site
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States
        • Research Site
      • Houston, Texas, United States
        • Research Site
      • Mesquite, Texas, United States
        • Research Site
      • Plano, Texas, United States
        • Research Site
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female aged 18 and over
  • Active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosed after the age of 16 and diagnosis within 5 years prior to study visit 1 and inadequate response to treatment with a maximum 2 Disease-Modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapies, or diagnosis within 5 years prior to study visit 1 and intolerance to DMARD therapy, or diagnosis within 2 years prior to study visit 1 and no previous use of DMARDs
  • 4 or more swollen joints and 4 or more tender/painful joints (from 28 joint count) and either Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) blood result of 28mm/h or more, or C-Reactive Protein (CRP) blood result of 10mg/L or more
  • At least 2 of the following: documented history or current presence of positive rheumatoid factor (blood test), radiographic erosion within 12 months prior to study enrolment, presence of serum anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (blood test)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Females who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • Poorly controlled hypertension
  • Liver disease or significant liver function test abnormalities
  • Certain inflammatory conditions (other than rheumatoid arthritis), connective tissue diseases or chronic pain disorders
  • Recent or significant cardiovascular disease
  • Significant active or recent infection including tuberculosis
  • Previously received treatment with a TNF alpha antagonist (including etanercept, certolizumab, adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab) or anakinra or previous treatment with other biological agent including rituximab, abatacept and tocilizumab
  • Use of any DMARDs within 6 weeks before first study visit
  • Severe renal impairment
  • Neutropenia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dosing Group A
Oral treatment and subcutaneous injection
Fostamatinib 100mg twice daily and placebo injection once every two weeks
Fostamatinib 100mg twice daily / fostamatinib 150mg once daily and placebo injection once every two weeks
Fostamatinib 100mg twice daily / fostamatinib 100mg once daily and placebo injection once every two weeks.
Experimental: Dosing Group B
Oral treatment and subcutaneous injection
Fostamatinib 100mg twice daily and placebo injection once every two weeks
Fostamatinib 100mg twice daily / fostamatinib 150mg once daily and placebo injection once every two weeks
Fostamatinib 100mg twice daily / fostamatinib 100mg once daily and placebo injection once every two weeks.
Experimental: Dosing Group C
Oral treatment and subcutaneous injection
Fostamatinib 100mg twice daily and placebo injection once every two weeks
Fostamatinib 100mg twice daily / fostamatinib 150mg once daily and placebo injection once every two weeks
Fostamatinib 100mg twice daily / fostamatinib 100mg once daily and placebo injection once every two weeks.
Active Comparator: Dosing Group D
Oral treatment and subcutaneous injection
Adalimumab 40mg injection once every two weeks and placebo to fostamatinib twice daily.
Other Names:
  • Humira®
Placebo Comparator: Dosing Group E
Oral treatment and subcutaneous injection
Placebo injection once every two weeks. Placebo to fostamatinib for six weeks, followed by fostamatinib 100mg twice daily (Group F) / fostamatinib 100mg twice daily then 150mg once daily (Group G).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DAS28-CRP Score - Change From Baseline to Week 6 Compared to Placebo
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
DAS28-CRP: Disease Activity Score based on a count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (CRP) and the patient's own assessment. Scores can take any positive value with a lower value indicating a better clinical condition. Mean changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP score are shown at each visit and are presented as decreases from baseline (defined as baseline minus post-baseline) with larger changes indicative of a better clinical condition. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, IR = inadequate response, LS = least squares, n/a = not applicable, PO = orally, QD = once a day, SC = subcutaneous.
Baseline and 6 weeks
DAS28-CRP Score - Change From Baseline to Week 24 Compared to Adalimumab
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
DAS28-CRP: Disease Activity Score based on a count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (CRP) and the patient's own assessment. Scores can take any positive value with a lower value indicating a better clinical condition. Mean changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP score are shown at each visit and are presented as decreases from baseline (defined as baseline minus post-baseline) with larger changes indicative of a better clinical condition. Non-responder imputation has been applied by carrying the baseline observation forward. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, IR = inadequate response, LS = least squares, n/a = not applicable, PO = orally, QD = once a day, SC = subcutaneous.
Baseline and 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DAS28 EULAR Response at Week 6
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Change in DAS28 was derived for each post baseline scheduled assessment and categorised using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Non-responder imputation has been applied by carrying the baseline observation forward. bid = twice daily, DAS28 = Disease Activity Score based on a 28-joint count, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, qd = once a day, SC = subcutaneous.
6 weeks
DAS28 EULAR Response at Week 24
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in DAS28 was derived for each post baseline scheduled assessment and categorised using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Non-responder imputation has been applied by carrying the baseline observation forward. bid = twice daily, DAS28 = Disease Activity Score based on a 28-joint count, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, qd = once a day, SC = subcutaneous.
24 weeks
Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 up to Week 24
Time Frame: 6 and 24 weeks
ACR20: American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as CRP) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. Non-responder imputation has been applied by carrying the baseline observation forward. BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, IR = inadequate response, n/a = not applicable, PO = orally, qd = once a day, SC = subcutaneous.
6 and 24 weeks
Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR50 up to Week 24
Time Frame: 6 and 24 weeks
ACR50: American College of Rheumatology 50% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as CRP) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. Non-responder imputation has been applied by carrying the baseline observation forward. BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, IR = inadequate response, n/a = not applicable, PO = orally, qd = once a day, SC = subcutaneous.
6 and 24 weeks
Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR70 up to Week 24
Time Frame: 6 and 24 weeks
ACR70: American College of Rheumatology 70% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as CRP) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. Non-responder imputation has been applied by carrying the baseline observation forward. BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, IR = inadequate response, n/a = not applicable, PO = orally, qd = once a day, SC = subcutaneous.
6 and 24 weeks
ACRn - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
ACRn: American College of Rheumatology Index of RA improvement, based on smallest percentage improvement in the count of swollen joints (out of 28 joints), count of tender joints (out of 28 joints) or in blood test measures of inflammation (such as CRP) or the physician and patient's own asessment of disease activity, pain and physical function. Scores are reported as a percentage improvement on a scale of -100 to +100, with larger values representing a better clinical outcome. Non-responder imputation has been applied by carrying the baseline observation forward. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, IR = inadequate response, n/a = not applicable, PO = orally, qd = once a day, SC = subcutaneous. Mean refers to change at Week 6. Treatment difference: difference between fostamatinib and placebo groups.
Baseline and 6 weeks
ACRn - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Adalimumab at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
ACRn: American College of Rheumatology Index of RA improvement, based on smallest percentage improvement in the count of swollen joints (out of 28 joints), count of tender joints (out of 28 joints) or in blood test measures of inflammation (such as CRP) or the physician and patient's own asessment of disease activity, pain and physical function. Scores are reported as a percentage improvement on a scale of -100 to +100, with larger values representing a better clinical outcome. Non-responder imputation has been applied by carrying the baseline observation forward. BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, IR = inadequate response, n/a = not applicable, PO = orally, qd = once a day, SC = subcutaneous. Mean refers to change at Week 24. Treatment difference: difference between fostamatinib and adalimumab groups.
Baseline and 24 weeks
HAQ-DI - Comparison of the Change From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index, a measure of physical function. The HAQ-DI score is calculated by summing the category scores from 8 sub-categories (ie, scores for patient ability in dressing and grooming, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities) and dividing by the number of categories completed. The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with a higher score indicating greater disability. Non-responder imputation has been applied by carrying the baseline observation forward. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, IR = inadequate response, LS = least squares, n/a = not applicable, PO = orally, qd = once a day, SC = subcutaneous.
Baseline and 6 weeks
HAQ-DI - Comparison of the Change From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Adalimumab at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index, a measure of physical function. The HAQ-DI score is calculated by summing the category scores from 8 sub-categories (ie, scores for patient ability in dressing and grooming, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities) and dividing by the number of categories completed. The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with a higher score indicating greater disability. Non-responder imputation has been applied by carrying the baseline observation forward. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, IR = inadequate response, LS = least squares, n/a = not applicable, PO = orally, qd = once a day, SC = subcutaneous.
Baseline and 24 weeks
SF-36 - Comparison of the Change in PCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Adalimumab at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
SF-36: 36-item Short Form Health Survey, a measure of health-related QoL. Scores for 8 sub-domains (Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Function, Role-Emotional & Mental Health) are derived & normalised to a scale of 0-100. Physical & Mental Component Scores (PCS & MCS) are derived by multiplying each of these 8 scores by a constant, summing them & standardising against a population with mean of 50, standard deviation of 10. Higher scores represent a better QoL. Mean changes from baseline score are presented at each visit as increases from baseline (defined as post-baseline minus baseline); larger changes indicate a better clinical condition. Non-responder imputation applied by carrying the baseline observation forward. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, IR = inadequate response, LS = least squares, PO = orally, QD = once a day, QoL = quality of life, SC = subcutaneous.
Baseline and 24 weeks
SF-36 - Comparison of the Change in MCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Adalimumab at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
SF-36: 36-item Short Form Health Survey, a measure of health-related QoL. Scores for 8 sub-domains (Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Function, Role-Emotional & Mental Health) are derived & normalised to a scale of 0-100. Physical & Mental Component Scores (PCS & MCS) are derived by multiplying each of these 8 scores by a constant, summing them & standardising against a population with mean of 50, standard deviation of 10. Higher scores represent a better QoL. Mean changes from baseline score are presented at each visit as increases from baseline (defined as post-baseline minus baseline); larger changes indicate a better clinical condition. Non-responder imputation applied by carrying the baseline observation forward. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, IR = inadequate response, LS = least squares, PO = orally, QD = once a day, QoL = quality of life, SC = subcutaneous.
Baseline and 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Neil MacKillop, MD PhD, AstraZeneca

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 22, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 6, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Fostamatinib and placebo injections

3
Subscribe