Wound Interdisciplinary Teams (WIT): A Community- Based Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (WIT)

October 24, 2013 updated by: Murray Krahn, University of Toronto

Wounds that are slow to heal (chronic) may be managed in different ways. In Ontario, care in the community for most of these is coordinated by the local Community Care Access Centre (CCAC). One or more health professionals might deliver treatment, individually or as part of a wound care team, with different members having different kinds of training (interdisciplinary team), which may or may not include wound care. Community treatment by interdisciplinary teams has been shown to be more effective and cost-effective for some long-standing health problems, but further scientific evidence is needed to determine if this is also true for chronic wounds.

This study compares the usual way chronic wounds are being managed in the community with a so-called "intermediate care" approach. In this study, intermediate care will involve health service providers following certain agreed-upon steps (evidence-based best practice) from first contact with the client through assessment, treatment, and on to referral to a hospital specialty wound care team, if needed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

For certain types of chronic illness, planning case management and providing care according to evidence-based guidelines (published methods that have been supported scientifically) results in better clinical outcomes and better cost-effectiveness. Wound management by interdisciplinary teams may have these advantages in both the community primary care setting and the hospital specialized care setting. Systematic review of the literature indicated that the evidence was incomplete to support implementation of an intermediate care model for community management of chronic wounds. Therefore, the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee recommended that a field evaluation be conducted to provide stronger evidence about the relative effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and feasibility of managing chronic wounds in the community using both standardized, comprehensive primary care and a systematic method of referral to a specialty, multidisciplinary team based in a hospital

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

451

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3M2
        • THETA Collaborative

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (>18 years of age) client with eligible wound type (not surgical, malignant or burns) referred to the Toronto Central CCAC for wound management.
  • Client (or substitute decision maker) provides written, informed consent.
  • Someone in client's home (or substitute decision maker) must be able to speak English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surgical wounds
  • Burns
  • Malignant wounds
  • Clients who are designated palliative on CCAC referral form

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Arm
Usual care is care as currently delivered to clients with chronic wounds in the community.
Experimental: Intervention Arm

Systematic referral to MDWCT and comprehensive primary care:

Intervention consists of systematic referral to MDWCT in conjunction with comprehensive primary care.Systematic referral to, and follow up, by MDWCTs, co-ordinated by the CM, will occur.There will be immediate referral to the MDWCT of clients with :1/ diabetic lower extremity ulcers,2/peripheral neuropathy, charcot changes,3/wound present longer than 4 mths. ,4/ Ankle Brachial Index less than 0.6, non-diabetics, and not being seen by a vascular surgeon. Subsequent referral to MDWCT will occur if less than 30% healing by week 4.

Systematic referral to, and follow up, by Multi-Disciplinary Wound Care Teams (MDWCTs), co-ordinated by the Case Manager (CM), will occur.There will be immediate referral to the MDWCT of clients with :1/ diabetic lower extremity ulcers,2/peripheral neuropathy, charcot changes,3/wound present longer than 4 mths. ,4/ Ankle Brachial Index less than 0.6, non-diabetics, and not being seen by a vascular surgeon. Subsequent referral to MDWCT will occur if less than 30% healing by week 4.
Other Names:
  • systematic expedited referral to MDWCTs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Healing
Time Frame: 6 months
The primary clinical outcome measure will be time to healing, ascertained by digital wound photography using computer planimetry for wound measurement.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
proportion of wound healed
Time Frame: 6 months
proportion of wounds healed at 6 mths and the rate of wound healing(cm2/week).
6 months
Wound recurrence
Time Frame: 6 months
Wound recurrence within the study period.
6 months
time to discontinuation of wound service
Time Frame: 1 years
Time to discontinuation of wound services within the CCAC and interdisciplinary teams.
1 years
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)
Time Frame: 6 months
Health related quality of life.
6 months
client satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
Satisfaction with care.
6 months
cost and resource use
Time Frame: 6 months
cost and resource use of wound care provided
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Murray Krahn, PhD, MD, Director

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 25, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2013

Last Verified

October 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 25973

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound of Skin

Clinical Trials on Systematic referral to MDWCT and comprehensive primary care

Subscribe