Healing Electroceutical Dressing for the Recovery of Open Wounds (HERO) (HERO)

March 4, 2026 updated by: Chandan Sen

Prospective, Unblinded, Randomized, Controlled Investigation to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy of PowerHeal™ Bioelectric Bandage in Managing Infected Traumatic Wounds

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether the wireless electroceutical dressing (WED) called PowerHeal™ Bioelectric Bandage, improves care of infected wounds by clearing the infection and helping the wound heal better.

The main hypotheses it aims to answer are:

  1. WED promotes wound closure, as determined by wound area measurement
  2. WED manages wound infection in civilian and military wounds in Ukraine, as determined by clinical assessment of wound infection by measuring the numbers and types of relevant microbes.

Researchers will compare to see if PowerHeal™ Bioelectric Bandage the dressing used in the SOC group

Participants will get their dressings changed per the protocol, wound image and swab will be taken.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Managing bacterial burden is necessary for effective wound healing. Military wounds are severely complex due to rise in multidrug resistant bacterial infections. A FDA cleared commercially available disposable, wireless electroceutical dressing fabric is able to generate a low electric field in presence of exudate in the wound environment. The electric field, along with the micro-molar amounts of superoxide anion radicals that is generated in the wound microenvironment, initiate a bactericidal and a pro-healing signaling cascade resulting in improved wound healing without the encumbrance of a bulky dressing.

There will be five visits over the course of 28 ± 2 days. Participants will be randomized and divided into two groups: one group will receive the standard of care (SOC) dressing and the other will receive the bioelectric bandage. Dressing change intervals will depend on the group the participant randomized to and how exudating the wound is.

The investigation doctor will collect demographic data - such as, age, sex, race; general medical history, and targeted wound data -such as cause, size, location, duration and total number of traumatic wounds. Standard of care clinical lab results (complete blood count, liver and kidney functions, presence and level of inflammation) will also be collected to evaluate body functions and health status . No blood will be collected for this study.

Vital signs (body temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, level of oxygen in blood) will be measured. The doctor will also look for signs of wound infection (of the investigation wound) including, redness, warmth, swelling, drainage, discoloration, friable granulation, foul odor, necrosis, and pustule/vesicles/boils. Participants will be asked about their pain experience compared to the moment of the injury.

A swab of the investigation wound will be collected per standard study guidelines at each investigation timepoint (unless the wound heals). A member of the study team will clean the wound using sterile sodium chloride solution, then gently rotate a sterile swab over a small area of the wound to collect a sample. All collected wound swabs will be sent to and processed in a central lab within Ukraine to check the infection status of the wound. Microbes detected in the wound will then be further analyzed in a separate central laboratory in the US to look at important factors such as antibiotic resistance. The results of the research wound swabs and analysis data will not be shared with the participant, or their medical care provider.

At each investigation timepoint, the investigation wound will also be photographed by the investigator or a member of the investigation team using the camera function on a standard smartphone to see if there is any change before and after receiving the treatment. The investigation wound will also be measured for size by holding a clear, sterile, wound measurement tool on top of the wound.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Shomita S Steiner, PhD, MS
  • Phone Number: (463) 237-8770
  • Email: SSTEINER@pitt.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76000
        • Recruiting
        • Ivano-Frankivsk Central Clinical Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female and male participants 18-105 years of age
  2. Hospital admission (or boarding in an emergency department or other area awaiting hospital admission) at participating clinical sites in Ukraine
  3. At least one infected traumatic wound(s) between 20-40 cm2 in size. Probable or confirmed wound infection(s) will be determined by on-site physicians' clinical judgment and the presence of two or more of the following clinical indicators of wound infection:

    1. Presence of worsening pain (from the moment of injury)
    2. Erythema (redness)
    3. Warmth (heat)
    4. Edema (swelling)
    5. Purulent exudate (drainage)
    6. Delayed healing
    7. Discoloration
    8. Friable granulation
    9. Foul odor
    10. Wound margin breakdown or necrosis with or without fever
    11. Pustules, vesicles, boils
  4. Participant or legal representative provides written informed consent prior to investigation procedures
  5. Participant understands and agrees to adhere to planned investigation procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Allergy to silver or zinc
  2. Women who are pregnant or nursing
  3. Women of childbearing potential without a documented negative pregnancy test during the current hospitalization or women of childbearing potential who refused pregnancy testing during screening
  4. Sponsor or contract research organization (CRO) staff directly involved in the conduct of the investigation, and site staff supervised by the investigator, and their respective family members
  5. > 60 days from the initial traumatic injury
  6. Known prisoner
  7. The patient is expected to be discharged from the hospital within the next 24 hours
  8. Medical condition other than the acute traumatic wound (and its manifestations) that is likely to result in death within 14 days of randomization
  9. Moribund condition, defined as life expectancy less than 48 hours from randomization
  10. Patients undergoing comfort care measures only such that treatment focuses on end-of-life symptom management over prolongation of life
  11. Expected inability or unwillingness to participate in study procedures
  12. In the opinion of the investigator, participation in the investigation is not in the best interest of the patient

Note: Allergies to parabens and acrylates will also be considered. While they are not direct exclusions, participants with these allergies should avoid being enrolled.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of Care (SOC) Group
The choice of wound dressing and timing of dressing changes will be determined by the investigation doctor until the participant's wound heals, or until the participant is discharged.
SOC will be determined by local established guidelines and participant needs. This may include sutures, staples, liquid skin adhesives, adhesive surgical tape, gauze dressings and negative pressure wound therapy treatment strategies.
Experimental: SOC + PowerHeal™ Bioelectric Bandage Group
  • The first SOC + PowerHeal™ Bioelectric Bandage will be applied within 24 hours of randomization.
  • Each participant is expected to need at least 15 PowerHeal™ Bioelectric Bandages throughout the study.

PowerHeal™ Bandage Change Schedule

Dressing change frequency depends on how much fluid (exudate) the wound produces.

  • Day 0-7 and Day 7-14: Minimum of 2 times per week, up to every other day.
  • Day 14-28: Minimum of once per week, more as needed dependent on wound exudate.
SOC will be determined by local established guidelines and participant needs. This may include sutures, staples, liquid skin adhesives, adhesive surgical tape, gauze dressings and negative pressure wound therapy treatment strategies.
PowerHeal™ Bioelectric Bandage is a flexible fabric electroceutical based wound bandage offering ease of portability with long shelf life and stable for storage under any conditions. PowerHeal™ Bioelectric Bandage may be preventively used on fresh wounds. PowerHeal™ Bioelectric Bandage can directly disrupt the biofilm infection and enhance host resilience such as restoring skin barrier function (10). Productive management of bacterial biofilm/MDR infection or risk of such infection will minimize healing complications. This will result in fewer treatments and corrective procedures and earlier return to daily life for patients with traumatic wounds/burns.
Other Names:
  • wireless electroceutical dressing (WED)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in wound area
Time Frame: 28 days (± 2 days)

Assess the efficacy of WED in promoting wound closure.

The digital photos taken at all visits will be quantitatively evaluated using ImageJ software that can measure the wound area. These measurements will be used for detailed analysis of wound closure over the period of study. Percentage decrease in wound area compared to SOC - from baseline (day 0) to final visit (day 28,± 2 days) will be calculated and analyzed, thus comparing range and rate of change between the two groups SOC and SOC + PowerHeal™ Bioelectric Bandage in aggregate.

Adjustment for the correlated variance due to repeated measures will be made throughout the analysis. All analysis will be conducted at 0.05 level of significance.

28 days (± 2 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in microbial population - types of strains and numbers of colonies
Time Frame: 28 days (± 2 days)

Assess the efficacy of PowerHeal™ Bioelectric Bandage in wound infection management.

Swabs will be collected per standard local study guidelines. Clearance or presence of the numbers and types of clinically relevant microbes such as multidrug resistant (MDR) strains of ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp.), Candida auris, and all Gram-negative isolates of clinical concern (e.g. Serratia sp., Citrobacter sp.) will be determined to evaluate the change in microbial load. Clinical assessments of wound infection will be calculated and compared across baseline, Day 7 (± 2 days), Day 14 (± 2 days) and end of study samples.

The speciation provided by the laboratory conducting the analysis will determine changes in microbial pathogen over time. Adjustments will be made for variances due to repeated measures, and all analyses will be conducted at 0.05 level of significance.

28 days (± 2 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chandan K. Sen, PhD, MS, University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY25010029
  • MTEC-24-01-MPA-085 (Other Identifier: The Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium, Inc. (MTEC))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infections

Clinical Trials on Standard of care dressing

Subscribe