Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) (EFESO)

February 13, 2023 updated by: Gianluca Castiello, IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato

Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) on Prevention for Complications After Open Saphenous Vein Harvest in Cardiac Surgery (EFESO Protocol).

The role of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is promising in reducing wound-related complications. However, the prophylactic use of NPWT in reducing wound complications in patients who underwent conventional open harvesting of the great saphenous vein has been under-investigated compering with other surgical approaches.

Therefore, this study aims to assess the effect size of the prophylactic NPWT in preventing wound dehiscence in high-risk patients who underwent conventional open harvesting of the great saphenous vein as a conduit for coronary artery bypass.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study design is a prospective, randomized, controlled, and monocentric trial. The primary endpoint is given by the reduction of wound dehiscence as a dichotomic outcome (yes versus no).

More precisely, in the experimental group, we will use the proposed device PICO7 (NPWT); this device is certificate CE. PICO consists of a single-use (i.e., completely disposable) NPWT unit, canister, and dressing that are designed for application over clean, closed, sutured, or stapled incisions in a simple peel-and-place process. Instead, in the control group, patients will receive standard care.

Finally, patients eligible to be enrolled in this study will be blindly randomized using for the arm allocation (allocation 1:1). Randomization should take place as soon as possible after consent. Patients will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive either dressing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (aged ≥ 50 years)
  • Diagnosis of Diabetes (both type 1 and 2) as comorbidity with anamnesis during the last year of poor glycemic control (HbA1C >7.5%)
  • BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment
  • Anamnesis of non-heling wounds
  • Wagner grade 2-5 foot wound
  • Osteomyelitis
  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindication to use PICO7 described previously.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SEQUENTIAL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental group
The dressing is a polyurethane film with acrylic adhesive that adheres the dressing to the skin surrounding the incision and a polyurethane shell that encapsulates the foam bolster and interface layer, providing a closed system. The PICO pump maintains negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) at 80mmHg (nominal) +/- 20mmHg to the wound surface. Exudate is managed by the dressing through a combination of absorption and evaporation of moisture through the outer film. PICO is intended for use in wound sizes (surface area x depth) up to 400 cm3, which are considered to be low to moderately exuding. The kit is intended to be used for 7 days on low-exuding wounds and 6 days on moderately exuding wounds. The therapy duration of the kit may be less than indicated if a clinical practice or other factors, such as wound type, wound size, rate or volume of exudate, orientation of the dressing or environmental conditions, result in more frequent dressing changes.

The use of PICO is contraindicated in the presence of:

  • Patients with malignancy in the wound bed or margins of the wound
  • Previously confirmed and untreated osteomyelitis
  • Nonenteric and unexplored fistulas
  • Necrotic tissue with eschar present
  • Exposed arteries, veins, nerves or organs
  • Exposed anastomotic sites
  • Emergency airway aspiration
  • Pleural, mediastinal or chest tube drainage
  • Surgical suction.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Control group
Patients in the control arm will receive a usual care dressing using absorbent cotton pads placed in contact with the wound. Dressings will be applied directly to the wound surface to protect the wound surface environment and the wound bed. Dressing chances are scheduled every 48h.
usual care dressing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Leg wound assessment
Time Frame: At baseline (post-surgery)
This outcome will be assessed as a categorial variable: a) no complication; b) dehiscence; c) signs of superficial infections. The operative assessment consists of a daily evaluation of the leg wound after the surgery and follow-up assessments.
At baseline (post-surgery)
Leg wound assessment
Time Frame: At 15 days post-surgery
This outcome will be assessed as a categorial variable: a) no complication; b) dehiscence; c) signs of superficial infections. The operative assessment consists of a daily evaluation of the leg wound after the surgery and follow-up assessments.
At 15 days post-surgery
Leg wound assessment
Time Frame: At one month post-surgery
This outcome will be assessed as a categorial variable: a) no complication; b) dehiscence; c) signs of superficial infections. The operative assessment consists of a daily evaluation of the leg wound after the surgery and follow-up assessments.
At one month post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General in hospital complications
Time Frame: Follow-up 15 days
General In-hospital clinical complications (yes versus no; if yes, which complications?)
Follow-up 15 days
Days of acute hospitalization
Time Frame: Follow-up 30 days
Length of hospital stay
Follow-up 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 25, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2023

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 126/int/2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound of Skin

Subscribe