Validation of Laboratory Test for Predicting Bone Tissue Regeneration (Rebone-test)

March 27, 2015 updated by: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Validation of Laboratory Test for Predicting Bone Tissue Regeneration in Patient Affected by Aseptic Pseudarthrosis and Treated With Platelet Gel

The aim of the study is to determine whether the evaluation of pro-osteogenic activity of autologous serum may predict the effectiveness of platelet gel in regenerating bone tissue in patients with nonunions of long bones.

Serum samples will be collected before the surgery, and their pro-osteogenic activity will be evaluated by using a bioactivity test (mineralization assay).

In order to determine whether the pro-osteogenic activity of the serum is able to discriminate between individuals who will achieve or will not achieve bone consolidation, the laboratory results will be correlated with clinical and radiographic results at 12 months, when patients will be considered as healed or not healed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pseudarthrosis (or 'nonunions') is defined as a bone movement which occurs after about 6 months from the traumatic event as consequence of the inadequate healing of a fracture. The use of regenerative medicine for treating recalcitrant pseudarthrosis is considered a promising strategy to promote bone consolidation. Among the various approaches used, the local cell therapy based on autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), combined with or without growth factors, has been extensively used. MSC reside within the stromal compartment of bone marrow which may be obtained from the iliac crest. Growth factors may be discharged from platelet gel (PG) which is obtained after activation of autologous platelet concentrates. Nevertheless, the results of recent clinical studies show that the above mentioned regenerative approach shows a failure rate of approximately 30% (Calori et al, 2008). The availability of a laboratory test which may predict the regenerative capacity of the PG may help the orthopaedic surgeon in addressing the decisions regarding the regenerative approach, e.g. to use or non use autologous platelet concentrates or to enhance the use of autologous derivatives with recombinant factors.The rationale for the use of platelet concentrates in pseudarthrosis is the significant reduction of osteoinductive growth factors observed at the lesion site (Gandhi et al., 2005). Platelet gel mimics what happens physiologically after any bone injury, when platelets are entrapped in a clot within a fibrin matrix. Platelet activation determines the release of various growth factors promoting bone healing. The optimal level and ratio of growth factors and their synergistic effects should be more efficient than single recombinant molecules, even though no data are available on the most relevant molecules and on their optimal amount. In this context, the in vitro mineralization assay could be a valid tool to assess the pro-osteogenic activity of platelet gel, thus obviating the measurement of the myriad of platelet-derived substances.

The aim of the study is to determine whether the evaluation of pro-osteogenic activity of autologous serum may predict the effectiveness of PG in the regeneration of bone tissue in patients with nonunions of long bones. The rationale is based on the following issues:

  • in 30% of long bone nonunions treated with PG, bone consolidation is not obtained (Calori et al, 2008);
  • the proportion of growth factors in serum is comparable to that observed in platelet gel after activation, even if the concentration is lower;
  • the autologous serum is able to support the 'in vitro' osteogenic differentiation of MSCs and the formation of mineral nodules (mineralization assay) (Granchi et al, 2010);
  • the correlation between 'in vitro' mineralization and regenerative capacity has been demonstrated in various experimental models (De Bari et al, 2008);
  • preliminary data obtained in our lab showed that in patients affected by congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia the presence of osteoinductive growth factors in serum is an essential requirement to warrant the effectiveness of the local cell therapy with MSC and PG (submitted paper).

In order to evaluate the ability of the autologous serum in inducing the mineralization in vitro the investigators will use a bioactivity test (mineralization assay). For this purpose serum samples of patients candidates to the treatment with MSC and PG will be collected the day before the surgery and used for cultivating normal MSC, whose ability to mineralize in vitro will be previously verified in standard culture conditions.

Further analysis will be conducted in order to determine whether the pro-osteogenic properties are maintained over time, and serum samples will be collected the 1 month before the surgery.

In order to determine whether the pro-osteogenic activity of the serum is able to predict and discriminate between individuals who achieve or not achieve bone consolidation, the laboratory results will be correlated with clinical and radiographic results at 12 months, when patients will be considered as healed or not healed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy, 40136
        • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

primary care clinic

Description

Eligible patients will be identified according to the following criteria.

Inclusion criteria:

  • patients with aseptic nonunion of long bones and candidates for treatment with platelet gel and MSC in addition to fixation devices and bone grafting;
  • patients who have given their written consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria:

  • patients with bone infections;
  • patients with congenital disorders involving the skeletal development;
  • patients treated with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents;
  • patients suffering from mental or psychiatric disorders that preclude the possibility of correctly adhering to the protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between laboratory results at the surgery and clinical and radiographic results at 12 months, when patients will be considered as healed or not healed.
Time Frame: 13 months, for each patient

The pro-osteogenic ability of autologous serum will be evaluated by using a bioactivity test (mineralization assay). For this purpose serum samples will be collected 1 day before the surgery and used for culturing osteogenic cells. The ability of inducing the mineralization will be assessed after 10 days of culture.

At 12 months, clinical outcome will be evaluated as follows:

  • anteroposterior and lateral X-rays to assess the continuity of bone in the various plans;
  • semeiotics of the consolidation;
  • assessment of pain during loading (Visual Analogue Scale).
13 months, for each patient

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the pro-osteogenic properties of serum over time.
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery

In order to determine whether the pro-osteogenic properties are maintained over time, we planned to collect other serum samples, namely preoperatively, 1 month before the surgery.

The pro-osteogenic activity will be evaluated as previously described.

1 month before surgery
Correlation between laboratory testing and timing of healing.
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively
Clinical and radiographic results will be assessed at intermediate end points, as previously described.
1, 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Donatella Granchi, MD, Laboratorio di Fisiopatologia Ortopedica e Medicina Rigenerativa - Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
  • Principal Investigator: Dante Dallari, MD, Centro di Riferimento Specialistico di Applicazioni Cliniche di Medicina Rigenerativa in Ortopedia - Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 30, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 30, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IOR 65/10

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nonunion of Fracture [Pseudarthrosis], Site Unspecified

Subscribe